Joyce briefly reviews several lines of re search pertinent to the design of teacher education programs. Thetopics include: the influences of field experiences, cooperating teachers, and supervision on the development of teaching styles; the effects of training paradigms on the acquisition of specific teaching skills and strategies; and the influence of person ality on ability to learn. He discusses the application of research to program de sign and the potential effects on stu dents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Borg, W.R., Kallenbach, W., Morris, M., & Friebel, A. (1969). Videotape feedback and microteaching in a teacher training modelJournal of Experimental Research , 37, 9-16.
2.
Borg, W.R., Kelly, M.L. , Langer, P., & Gall, M. (1970). The minicourse: A microteaching approach to teacher educationBeverly Hills, CA: MacMillan .
3.
Brown, C. (1967). A multivariate study of the teaching styles of student teachersNew York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
4.
Brown, C. (1981). The relationship between teaching styles, personality, and setting In B. Joyce, L. Beck, and C. Brown (Eds.) Flexibility in teaching (pp. 94-100). New York: Longman.
5.
Cook, W., Leeds, C.H., & Callis, R. (1951). The Minnesota teacher attitude inventoryNew York: Psychological Corporation.
6.
Cogan, M. (1973). Clinical supervisionBoston : Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Courmier, S., & Hagman, J. (Eds.). ( 1987). Transfer of learning.San Diego: Academic Press.
8.
Dalton, M. (1986). The thought processes of teachers when practicing two models of teaching Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
9.
Dalton, M., & Dodd, J. (1986). Teacher thinking: The development of skill in using two models of teaching and model-relevant thinkingPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
10.
Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teacher behaviorReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
Flint, S. (1965). The relationship between the classroom verbal behavior of student teachers and the classroom verbal behavior of their cooperating teachers Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University
12.
Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational changeNew York: Teachers College Press.
13.
Gagné, R. (1962). Psychological principles in system developmentNew York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
14.
Galluzzo, G. (1987). Models of teaching revisitedJournal of Teacher Education, 38 (6), 57-59.
15.
Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1974). An empirical investigation: Changing teacher behaviorJournal of Educational Psychology , 66, 399-405.
16.
Glaser, R. (Ed.) (1962). Training research and education.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
17.
Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, W. (1969). The persistence of the recitationAmerican Educational Research Journal, 6, 145- 167.
18.
Howey, K., Yarger, S., & Joyce, B. (1978). Improving teacher educationWashington, DCAssociation for Teacher Education.
19.
Hunt, D., & Joyce, B. (1967). Teacher trainee personality and initial teaching styleAmerican Educational Research Journal , 4, 253-259.
20.
Hunt, D., Joyce, B., and Del Popolo, J. (1964). An exploratory study of the modification of student teachers' behavior patterns Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University.
21.
Hunter, M. (1980). Six types of supervisory conferencesEducational Leadership, 37 , 408-412.
22.
Hunter, M., & Russell, D. (1981). Planning for effective instruction: Lesson design. In Increasing your teaching effectivenessPalo Alto, CA : Learning Institute.
23.
Joyce, B., Peck, L., & Brown, C. (Eds.). (1981). Flexibility in teaching.New York: Longman .
24.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1983). Power in staff development through research on trainingWashington, DC. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1987). Student achievement through staff developmentNew York: Longman.
26.
Joyce, B., Showers, B., & Bennett, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysisEducational Leadership, 45 (3), 77-87.
27.
Joyce, B., Showers, B., & Rolheiser-Bennett, C. (1987). Staff development and student learning: A synthesis of research on models of teachingEducational Leadership, 45 (2), 11-23.
28.
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1986). Madels of teachingEnglewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
29.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Wald, R. (1981). Can teachers leam repertoires of models of teaching? In B. Joyce, L. Peck, and C. Brown (Eds.) Flexibility in teaching (pp. 141-156). New York: Longman.
30.
Seperson, M. (1970). The relationship between the teaching styles of student teachers and those of their cooperating teachers Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
31.
Seperson, M., & Joyce, B. ( 1981). The relationship between the teaching styles of student teachers and those of their cooperating teachers In B. Joyce, L. Peck, and C. Brown (Eds.) Flexibility in teaching (pp. 101-108). New York: Longman.
32.
Showers, B. (1985). Teachers coaching teachersEducational Leadership, 42 (70, 43-49.
33.
Sirotnik, K. (1983). What you see is what you get: Consistency, persistence, and mediocrity in classroomsHarvard Educational Review , 53 (1), 16-31.
34.
Smith, K., & Smith, M. (1966). Cybernetic principles of learning and educational designNew York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
35.
Spaulding, R. (1970). Educational Improvement ProgramDurham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
Tinsman, S. (1981). The effects of instructional flexibility training on teaching styles and controlled repertoire Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
37.
Weil, M. (1973). Deriving teaching skills from models of teachingPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
38.
Zahorik, J. (1986). Let's be realistic about flexibility in teachingEducational Leadership, 44 (2), 50-52.
