King examines the relationship between teacher educators and their colleagues in the liberal arts and sciences. Two reasons are identified regarding why lib eral arts faculty historically have come to distrust or to be disdainful of teacher education programs. Further, the author discusses specific activities that liberal arts faculty members might engage in to improve teacher education and she includes suggestions for increasing their participation in the teacher prepara tion process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Borrowman, M.L. (1956). The liberal and technical in teacher education . New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College.
2.
Borrowman, M.L. (1965). Liberal education and the professional education of teachers. In M. L. Borrowman (Ed.), Teacher education in America: A documentary history (pp. 1-53). New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University .
3.
Brown, H., & Mayhew, L. (1965). American higher education. New York: Center for Applied Research in Education .
4.
Bruner, J.S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Bruner, J.S. (1971). The process of education revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, 53 (1), 18-21.
6.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy ( 1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21 st century. New York: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy .
7.
Ducharme, E.R. (1985). Establishing the place of teacher education in the university. Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (4), 8-11.
8.
Dyer, J.R. (1966). Tulane: The biography of a university, 1834-1965 . New York: Harper and Row.
9.
Gideonse, H.D. (1984). A future role for liberal arts colleges in the preparation of teachers. In A. Tom (Ed.), Teacher education in liberal arts settings (pp. 1-12). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education .
10.
Ginsberg, R., & Wimpelberg, R.K. (in press). An assessment of educational reform reports. In C. Willie & I. Miller (Eds.), Twentieth century theories of education. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.
11.
Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change . Educational Researcher, 15 (5), 5-12.
12.
Holmes Group, The (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group.
13.
Judge, H. (1982). American graduate schools of education: A view from abroad. New York: Ford Foundation .
14.
King, J.A., & Pechman, E.M. (1984). Pinning a wave to the shore: Conceptualizing school evaluation use. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 6 (3), 241-251.
15.
Lanier, J.E., & Little, J.W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 527-569). New York: MacMillan.
16.
Mattingly, P.H. (1975). The classless profession. New York: New York University Press.
17.
Powell, A.G. (1980). The uncertain profession. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Schwebel, M. (1985). The clash of cultures in academe: The university and the education faculty. Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (4), 2-7.
19.
Travers, E.E. (1980). The case for teacher education at selective liberal arts colleges. Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 127-131.
20.
Willis, R. (1962). Higher education in the United States, 1862-1962 . In W. Breckman & S. Lehrer (Eds.), A century of higher education (pp. 19-31). New York: Society for the Advancement of Education .
21.
Wimpelberg, R.K., Nystrom, N.J., & King, J.A. (1984). Teacher education in private colleges and universities: University and diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (3), 31-35.
