Faculty development in schools, col leges, and departments of education should address the special needs of teacher education and reflect current knowledge of adult and career develop ment. This article proposes six priorities for faculty development that can strengthen the role of teacher education within the academy while developing the vitality of the education faculty indi vidually and collectively.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Astin, A.W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
2.
Bland, C.J., & Schmitz, C.C. (1986, April). Faculty vitality on review: Retrospect and prospect. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco .
3.
Bradford, D.L., & Cohen, A.R. (1984). Managing for excellence. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
4.
Clark, S. M., & Lewis, D. R. (Eds.). (1985). Faculty vitality and institutional productivity. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Copeland, W.D., & Jamgochian, R. (1985). Colleague training and peer review. Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (2), 18-21.
6.
Eble, K.E., & McKeachie, W.J. (1985). Improving undergraduate education through faculty development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Goodlad, J. (1986, April). Essential connections for preparing better teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco .
8.
Group of Human Development in Higher Education. ( 1974). Faculty development in a time of retrenchment. New Rochelle, NY: Change Magazine Press.
9.
Schuster, J.H., & Bowen, H.R. (1985). The faculty at risk. Change, 17 (4), 12-21.
10.
Schwebel, M. (1985). The clash of cultures in academe: The university and the education faculty. Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (4), 2-7.
