Teacher education, according to Beyer, has too seldom been conceived as either contributing to the maintenance of the liberal arts (elitist) tradition or to the de velopment of technical knowledge. If re- conceived as practical philosophy, teacher education could further the humanistic and democratic impulses of liberal education and reshape the cul ture of the contemporary university. Further, by viewing teacher education programs as instances of practical philosophy committed to reflection, con versation, and action, teacher educators can assist the movement of the modern university away from its allegiances to elitism and tachnicism and toward an education that truly prepares teachers for participation in classroom life.
Apple, M.W., & Beyer, L.E. (1983). Social evaluation of curriculum. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 5 (4), 425-434.
3.
Apple, M.W., & Weis, L. (1983). Ideology and practice in schooling. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
4.
Barzun, J., (1968). The American university: How it runs, where it is going. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
6.
Beyer, L.E. (1983). Philosophical work, practical theorizing, and the nature of schooling. TheJournal of Curriculum Theorizing , 5 (1), 73-91.
7.
Beyer, L.E. (1984). Field experience, ideology, and the development of critical reflectivity. Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (3), 36-41.
8.
Beyer, L.E. (1986). The parameters of educational inquiry. Curriculum Inquiry, 16 (1), pp. 87-114.
9.
Beyer, L.E., & Zeichner, K.M. (1982). Teacher training and educational foundations: A plea for discontent. Journal of Teacher Education , 33 (3), 18-23.
10.
DeVane, W.C. (1957). The American university in the twentieth century . Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
11.
Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education . In C. A. McMurry (Ed.), The third yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education, Part I (pp. 9-30). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12.
Downing, H. (1981). 'They call me a life-size Meccano set': Super-secretary or super-slave? In A. McRobbie and T McCabe (Eds.), Feminism for girls: An adventure story (pp. 80-100). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
Eddy, E.D., Jr. (1956). Colleges for our land and time: The land-grant idea in American education. New York: Harper.
14.
Feinberg, W. (1977). An examination of some political and economic influences on general education. Paper presented at the Modern Language Association Conference, Chicago, Illinois.
15.
Feinberg, W. (1983). Understanding education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Haskins, C.H. (1923). The rise of universities. New York: Henry Holt.
17.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
18.
Mill, J.S. (n.d.). Inaugural address delivered at the University of St. Andrews, February 1, 1867. Boston: Littel and Gay.
19.
Muelder, H.R. (1984). Missionaries and muckrakers: The first hundred years of Knox College. Urbana: University of Illinois Press .
20.
Nevins, A. (1962). The state universities and democracy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
21.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
22.
Ross, E.D. (1942). Democracy's college: The land-grant movement in the formutive stage. Ames, IA: The Iowa State College Press .
23.
Smith, B.O. (1980). A design for a school of pedagogy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24.
Zeichner, K.M. (1983). The deskilling of teachers and the phenomenon of teacher stress. Unpublished paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison .
