Research on teacher thinking suggests that teacher behavior is a by-product of information processing strategies, which enable teachers to read effectively the classroom environment. These strategies emerge, many would argue, because of experience in classrooms and not as a result of training in methods-type courses. This paper presents counter- evidence to suggest that prospective teachers can learn to expand their class room knowledge through cognitive dis crimination training.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Clark, C.M. (1980). Choice of a model for research on teacher thinking . Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12 (1), 41-47.
2.
Clark, C.M., & Elmore, S.L. (1981). Transforming curriculum and mathematics, science and writing: A core study of teacher yearly planning. (Research Series No. 99). Michigan State University: Institute for Research on Teaching.
3.
Clark, C.M., & Yinger, R.J. (1981). Research on teacher thinking. (Research Series No. 12). Michigan State University: Institute for Research on Teaching.
4.
Doyle, W. (1979). Making managerial decisions in classrooms. In D. L. Duke (Ed.) Classroom Management. (Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Emmer, E.T., Sanford, J.P., Clements, B.S., & Martin, J. (1982). Improving classroom management and organization in junior high schools: An experimental investigation. University of Texas , Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.
6.
Evertson, C.M., & Emmer, E.T. (1982). Effective management at the beginning of the school year in junior high classes. Journal of Educational Psychology , 74 (4), 485-498.
7.
Hansford, B., & Copeland, W. (1979). Microteaching as a tool for training of teachers: Some current considerations. S.P.A.T.E., 7 (3-4), 6875.
8.
Jackson, P.W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9.
Joyce, B. (1978). Toward a theory of information processing in teaching . Educational Research Quarterly, 3, 66-67.
10.
McLeod, G.R. (1981). Economy as an explanatory concept in the study of teacher thinking. Paper presented at the annual conference of the South Pacific Association for Teacher Education, Adelaide.
11.
McNair, L., & Joyce, B. (1978-1979). Thought and action, a frozen section: The South Bay Study. Educational Research Quarterly , 3, 16-25.
12.
Marland, P.W. (1977). A study of teachers' interactive thoughts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta.
13.
Morine-Dershimer, G. (1978-1979). Planning in classroom reality, an in-depth look. Educational Research Quarterly, 3, 83-99.
14.
Morine, G., & Vallence, E. (1975). Special study B: A study of teacher/ pupil perceptions of classroom interaction. (B.T.S.S., Technical Report 75-116). San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Education Research and Development.
15.
Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Peterson, P.L., & Clark, C.M. (1978). Teacher reports of their cognitive processes during teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 555-565.
17.
Shavelson, R.J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers' pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51 (4), 455-498.
18.
Shulman, L.S., & Elstein, A.S. (1975). Studies of problem solving, judgment, and decision-making: Implications for educational research. In Kerlinger, F. N. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 3). Hasca, Illinois : F. E. Peacock.
19.
Sprinthall, N.A., & Thies-Springhall, L. (1983). The teacher as an adult learner: A cognitive development view. In 82nd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Wagner, A.C. (1973). Changing teacher behavior: A comparison of microteaching and cognitive discrimination training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 299-305.