Administrative Effectiveness of Deans of Education on Decisions Affecting Teacher Education

Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. ( 1973). Priorities for action: Final report of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, New York: McGraw Hill.

Clark, D. , & Guba, E. (1977). A study of teacher education institutions as innovators, knowledge producers and change agencies. Washington, DC : National Institute of Education.

Coladarci, A. (1980). Some notes on deans as individuals and the dean . In D. Griffiths & D. McCary (Eds.) The dilemma of the deanship (pp. 125-131). Danville, IL: Interstate.

Corson, J. (1960). Governance of colleges and universities. New York: McGraw Hill.

Corson, J. (1975). The governance of colleges and universities. New York: McGraw Hill.

Drucker, P. (1966). The effective executive. New York: Harper and Row.

Griffiths, D. , & McCarty, D. (1980). The dilemma of the deanship. Danville, IL: Interstate.

Jacques, E. (1970). Work, creativity, and social justice. New York: International Universities Press.

Lee, E. , & Bowen, E (Eds.). (1971). The multi campus university — A study on academic governance. (Carnegie Commission on Higher Education). New York: McGraw Hill.

Myers, C. , & Turnbull, J. (1956). Line and staff in industrial relations. Harvard Business Review, 33, 113-124.

Peterson, M. (1974). Organization and administration in higher education: Sociological and social-psychological perspectives." In T. Kerlinger & J. Carroll (Eds.), Review of research in education, V. 2, (pp. 296-347). Itasca, IL: E E. Peacock.

Ryan, D.W. (1974). Organizational adaptation to professional differentiation in the university. Interchange, 5, 55-66.

Simon, H. (1949). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making processes in adminitrative organizations. New York: MacMillan.