Balderston, F.E.Managing Today's University. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.
2.
Bevan, J.M.The deanship. Liberal Education, 1967, 3(3), 344.
3.
Boulding, K.E.The management of decline. Change, 1975, 64, 8.
4.
Cheit, E.F.The new depression in higher education. New York: Carnegie Commission, 1971.
5.
Clark, D.L., & Guba, E.G.Schools, colleges, and departments of education: Demographic and contextual features. In D. E. Griffiths & D. J. McCarty (Eds.), The dilemma of the deanship . Danville, IL: Interstate Printers , 1980.
6.
Dill, W.R.The deanship: An unstable craft. In D. E. Griffiths & D. J. McCarty (Eds.), The dilemma of the deanship. Danville, IL : Interstate Printers, 1980.
7.
Giaquinta, J.Organization change in schools of education: A review of several models and an agenda of research. In D. E. Griffiths & D. J. McCarty (Eds.), The dilemma of the deanship. Danville, IL: Interstate Printers, 1980.
8.
Heyman, I.Memorandum re: School of Education. Addressed to a series of committees and councils of the University of California- Berkeley, 1982.
9.
Judge, H.American graduate schools of education. New York: Ford Foundation, 1982.
10.
Kennedy, C.Advancing knowledge. An address to the Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching at their 75 th Anniversary, 1981.
11.
Melchiori, G.S.Smaller and better: The University of Michigan experience. Research in Higher Education, 1982, 16 (1), 55-69.
12.
Peseau, B.A.Developing an adequate resource base for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 1982, 33 (4), 13-15.