Adams, M.J., & Collins, A.A schema-theoretic view of reading (Tech. Rep. No. 32). Urbana-Champaign : University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading, 1977.
2.
Ames, W.The development of a classification scheme of contextual aids. Reading Research Quarterly, 1966, 2, 57-82.
3.
Anderson, R.C., & Freebody, P.Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews. Newark, Delaware : International Reading Association , 1981.
4.
Anderson, R.C., & Shifrin, Z.The meaning of words in context. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
5.
Asher, S.R.Topic interest and children's reading comprehension. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce , & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
6.
Bougere, M.B.Selected factors in oral language related to first-grade reading achievement . Reading Research Quarterly, Fall 1964, pp.31-58.
7.
Brewer, W.F.Literary theory, rhetoric, and stylistics : Implications for psychology. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , 1980.
8.
Brown, A.L.Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
9.
Bruce, B.Plans and social action (Tech. Rep. No. 34). Urbana-Champaign : University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading , 1977.
10.
Carroll, R.P.An experimental study of comprehension in reading with special reference to the reading of directions. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1926.
11.
Dale, E.The words we know: A national inventory. Palo Alto, California : Field Educational Publications, 1973.
12.
Dale, E., & O'Rourke, J.Techniques of teaching vocabulary. Palo Alto, California : Field Educational Publications, 1971.
13.
Dale, E., Pazik, T., & Petty, W.Bibliography of vocabulary studies. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University, 1973.
14.
Dewey, J.Democracy and education. New York: MacMillan Co., 1916.
15.
Downing, J.Comparative reading. New York: MacMillan Co., 1973.
16.
Durrell, D.D., Nicholson, A., Olson, A.V., Gavel, S.R., & Linehan, E.B.Success in first grade reading. Journal of Education, 1958, 140(3), 2-48.
17.
Fischer, D.L.Functional literacyand the schools. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education, 1978. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 151 760)
18.
Gans, R.A study of critical reading comprehension in the intermediate grades. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1940.
19.
Goldberg, M.Personal communication, July31, 1981.
20.
Goodlad, J.I.Research and theory regarding promotion and nonpromotion. The Elementary School Journal.1952, 53150-155.
21.
Goodman, K.S.Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 1967, 6, 126-135.
22.
Gray, W.S.The major aspects of Reading. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Reading held at the University of Chicago, 1960, 90, 8-24. (Supplementary Educational Monographs)
23.
Gray, W.S.The teaching of reading: A world view. Paris: UNESCO, 1956.
24.
Gray, W.S., & Monroe, R.The reading interests and habits of adults. New York: MacMillan Co., 1929.
25.
Gray, W.S., & Rogers, B.Maturity in reading: Its nature and appraisal. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1956 .
26.
Henry, N. B. (Ed.). Adult reading (Fifty-fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
27.
Huggins, A.W.F., & Adams, M.J.Syntactic aspects of reading comprehension. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
28.
Jenkinson, M.D.Selected processes of reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1957.
29.
Judd, C.H., & Buswell, G.T.Silent reading: A study of the various types. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1922.
30.
Lefevre, C.A.Linguistics and the teaching of reading. New York: McGraw Hill, 1962.
31.
Letton, M.Individual differences in interpretive responses in reading poetry at the ninth-grade level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1958.
32.
Link, H.C., & Hopf, H.A.People and books: A study of reading and book buying habits. New York: Book Industry Committee of the Book Manufacturers' Institute, 1946.
33.
Mason, J., & McCormick, C.Testing the development of reading and linguistic awareness (Tech. Rep. No. 126). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading, 1979.
34.
Ogden, C.K., & Richards, I.A.The meaning of meaning. New YorkHarcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., 1927.
35.
Piekarz, J.A.Individual differences in interpretive responses in reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1954.
36.
Rankin, M.Children's interests in library books of fiction. New York : Teachers College, Columbia University, 1944.
37.
Robinson, H.M.The major aspects of reading. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Reading held at the University of Chicago, 1966, 96, 22-32. (Supplementary Educational Monographs)
38.
Rubin, A.A theoretical taxonomy of the differences between oral and written language . In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, New JerseyLawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.
39.
Shaben, E.J.Theories of semantic memory. Approaches to knowledge and sentence comprehension . In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , 1980.
40.
Smith, B.O.A design for a school of pedagogy (U.S. Department of Education Publication No. E-80-42000). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980.
41.
Smith, F.Understanding reading. New YorkHolt, Rinehart and Winston, 1978.
42.
Smith, H.K.The responses of good and poor readers when asked to read for different purposes . Reading Research Quarterly, 1967, 3, 53-82.
43.
Stauffer, R.G.Directing reading maturity as a cognitive processNew YorkHarper and Row, 1969.
44.
Timpane, M.Prepared statement presented to the Subcommittee on Select Education of the Committee on Education and Labor (U.S. Department of Education Publication No. 60-587 0). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980.
45.
Waples, D., Berelson, B., & Bradshaw, F.R.What reading does to people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1940.