Adams, R.D.Follow-up and evaluation of teacher education graduates: A pilot study Final report. Bowling Green, KY: Office of Educational Research, Western Kentucky University, 1974.
2.
Adams, R.D.Western Kentucky University follow-up evaluation of teacher education graduates In S.M. Hord and G.E. Hall (Eds.), Teacher education prog-gram evaluation: A collection of current effortsAustin, TX : Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas, 1978.
3.
Adams, R.D.Critical findings from the teacher preparation evaluation program: Teacher entry, retention, and changeA paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco , 1979.
4.
Adams, R.D., & Craig, J.R.A survey of undergraduate teacher education evaluation practices In S.M. Hord and R.D. Adams (Eds.), Teacher education program evaluation: Theory and practice., 1981 Austin, TX : Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas,1981.
5.
Ayers, J.B.Teacher education program of study at Tennessee Technological University In S.M. Hord and G.E. Hall (Eds.), Teacher education program evaluation: A collection of current efforts.Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas, 1978.
6.
Cohen, L.H.Factors affecting the utilization of mental health evaluation research findingsProfessional Psychology, 1977 , 8(4), 526-534.
7.
Craig, J.R. & Adam, R.D.Use-oriented evaluation InS.M. Hord and R.D. Adams (Eds.), Teacher education program evaluation: Theory and practice. , 1981 Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas, 1981.
8.
Cruickshank, D.R.Evaluation: Follow-up of graduatesColumbus, OH : Ohio State University, 1977. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 100 925)
9.
Flowers, J.D.Measuring beginning teacher satisfaction with pre-professional training , 1978. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 098)
10.
Fuller, F.F.Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualizationAmerican Educational Research Journal.1969. 6(2), 207-226.
11.
Hall, G.E.The effects of "change" on teachers and professors — Theory, research and implications for decision-makersAustin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas , 1975.
12.
Katz, L., Raths, J., Mohanty, C., Kurachi, A., & Irving, J.Follow-up studies: Are they worth the trouble?Journal of Teacher Education, 1981, 32(2), 18-24.
Pankratz, R., & Harryman, E.The Western Kentucky University evaluation model : Implications for career decisionsA paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Chicago, 1978
15.
Patton, M.O.Utilization-focused evaluationBeverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1977.
16.
Pegues, W.An assessment of teacher education follow-up evaluation in the United States: A descriptive analysis. Ph.D. DissertationThe University of Tulsa, 1978.
17.
Ryan, K., Applegate, J., Flora, V., Johnston, J., Lasley, T., Mager, G., & Newman, K.My teacher education program? Well ..., First year teachers reflect and reactPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Chicago, 1978
18.
Schalock, H.D.,Garrison, J.H., Girod, G.R., & Myers, K.H.Evaluative studies of graduates from teacher preparation programs at Oregon College of Education In S.M. Hord and G.E. Hall (Eds.), Teacher education program evaluation: A collection of current efforts.Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas, 1978.
19.
Sommer, R.No, not researchI said evaluation!APA Monitor , 1977, 8(4), 1:11.
20.
Swami, P.A follow-up study of evaluation of the preservice secondary science teachereducation program at the Ohio State University, 1979 . (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 113 200)
21.
Wortman, P.M.Evaluation research: A psychological perspectiveAmerican Psychologist, 1975, 30, 562-575.