Geisinger, K.F. and Rabinowitz, W.Individual differences among college faculty in grading. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education , San Francisco, April 1979.
2.
Davis, J.A.What college teachers value in students. College Board Review , 1965, 56, 15-18.
3.
Dressel, P.L.Handbook of academic evaluation. San Francisco; Jossey-Bass, 1976.
4.
Lewis, W.A., Dexter, H.G., & Smith, W.G.Grading procedures and test validation: A proposed new approachjournal of Educational Measurement, 1978, 15(3), 219-227.
5.
Longstreth, L.E., & Jones, D.Some longitudinal data on grading practices at one universityTeaching of Psychology, 1976, 3(2), 78-81.
6.
Lunneborg, P.W.College grades: What do professors intend to communicate to whom? The AAUP Bulletin, 1978, 64(1), 33-35.
McKeachie, W.J., Lin, Y.G., Moffett, M.M., & Daughtery, M.Effective teaching: Facilitative vs. direct styleTeaching of Psychology, 1978, 5(4), 193-194.
9.
Milton, O.Improving achievement via essay examsJournal of Veterinary Medicine Education, 1979, 6(2), 108-112.
10.
Thorndike, R.L.Marks and marking systems In R.L. Ebel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (4th ed.) Washington, D.C.: The American Educational Research Association, 1969, pp. 759-766.
11.
Travers, R.M.W., & Gronlund, N.E.The meaning of marksjournal of Higher Education, 1950, 21(7), 369-374.
