The purpose of this paper is to compare the relative effectiveness of a common set of instructional behaviors for fourth grade mathematics students across two different SES settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berliner, D. & Tikunoff, W.The California beginning teacher evaluation study: Overview of the ethnographic study. Journal of Teacher Education, 1976, 27, 24-30.
2.
Brophy, J. & Everston, C.Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective. Boston : Allyn and Bacon, 1976.
3.
Brophy, J. & Good, T.Brophy-Good system (Teacher-child dyadic interaction). In A. Simon and E. Boyer (Eds.), Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of observation instruments continued, 1970 supplement (Vol. A). Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, 1970.
4.
Good, T.Direct instruction: A new polemic? (Technical Report No. 138). Columbia, Mo.: Center for Research in Social Behavior, University of Missouri, 1978.
5.
Good, T.The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project: A program of naturalistic and experimental research. (Technical Report No. 140). Columbia, Mo.: Center for Research in Social Behavior, University of Missouri, 1978.
6.
Good, T., & Grouws, D.Teaching effects: A process-product study in fourth grade mathematics classrooms . Journal of Teacher Education, 1977, 28, 49-54.
7.
Good, T., Grouws, D., Beckerman, T., Ebmeier, H., Flatt, L., & Schneeberger, S.Teachers manual: Missouri mathematics effectiveness project (Technical Report No. 132). Columbia, Mo.: Center for Research in Social Behavior, University of Missouri, 1978.
8.
Good, T. & Power, C.Designing successful classroom environments for different types of students . Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1976, 8, 45-60.
9.
McDonald, F.Report on phase II of the beginning teacher evaluation study. Journal of Teacher Education, 1976, 27, 39-42.
10.
Medley, D.Teacher competence and teacher effectiveness: A review of process-product research. Washington, D.C.: AACTE , 1977.
11.
Miller, N.Summary and conclusions. In H. Gerard & N. Miller (Eds.), School desegregation: A long-range study. New York: Plenum Press1975
12.
Miller, N.Personality differences between the Black and White children in the Riverside School Study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1970.
13.
Rosenshine, B.New insights and questions from recent research in elementary schools. A paper read at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City, April 4-8, 1977.
14.
Schmidt, W., Porter, A., Floden, R., & Freeman, D.Training manual for the classification of the content of fourth grade mathematics . East Lansing, Mich.: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
15.
Stayrook, N. and Crawford, J.An experiment on teacher effectiveness and parent-assisted instruction in the third grade: The observational data. An experiment on teacher effectiveness and parent-assisted instruction. Stanford, Calif.: Center for Educational Research at Stanford, University of Stanford, May 1978.
