David Berliner, Charlie Fisher, and Len Cahen—FarWest Laboratory; Walter Borg—UtahState University;
3.
Jere Brophy and Carolyn Evertson —Texas Research and Development Center in Teacher Education;
4.
Homer Coker— Carrolton State College, Georgia, and Don Medley— University of Virginia;
5.
N.L. Gage— Stanford Research and Development Center in Teaching;
6.
Meredith Gall, William Tikunoff, and Betty Ward— Far West Laboratory;
7.
Tom Good— University of Missouri;
8.
Gene Hall, Sue Loucks, Gary Borich, and Robert Peck— Texas Research and Development Center in Teaching;
9.
Gaea Leinhardt, Margaret Wang, and William Cooley— Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburg;
10.
Fred McDonald— Educational Testing Service;
11.
Robert Soar— University of Florida;
12.
Jane Stallings— Stanford Research Institute.
13.
B.A. Ward and W.J. Tikunoff, Application of Research to Teaching, Report A75-2 ( San Francisco, Calif.: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research, 1975).
14.
Stanford Program on Teaching Effectiveness, A Factorially Designed Experiment on Teacher Structuring, Soliciting, and Reacting (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, 1976).
15.
J.A. Stallings and D.H. Kaskowitz, "A Study of Follow Through Implementation," Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 1975 (Menlo Park, Stanford Research Institute).
16.
J.E. Brophy and C.M. Evertson, Process-Product Correlations in the Texas Teacher Effectiveness Study: Final Report (Austin, Tex.: The University of Texas, 1974).
17.
R.S. Soar, Follow Through Classroom Process Measurement and Pupil Growth (1970-71): Final Report (Gainesville, Fla.: College of Education, University of Florida, 1973).
18.
Ward and Tikunoff, op. cit
19.
B.J. Williams et al., Math Tutoring Study ( San Francisco, Calif.: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1975).
20.
R.B. Bausell , W.B. Moody, and F.N. Walzl, "A Factorial Study of Tutoring Versus Classroom Instruction," American Educational Research Journal9 ( 1972): 591-99.
21.
G.E. Hall, The Effects of "Change" on Teachers and Professors—Theory, Research, and Implications for Decision Makers (Austin, Tex.: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, the University of Texas, 1975).
22.
Gene E. Hall et al., "Levels of Use of the Innovation: A Framework for Analyzing Innovation Adoption," Journal of Teacher EducationXXVI, no. I (Spring 1975): 52-56.
23.
W.J. Tikunoff , D. Berliner, and R. Rist, An Ethnographic Study of Forty Classrooms , Technical Report no. 75-10-5 (San Francisco, Calif.: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research , 1975).
24.
F.J. McDonald , et al., Beginning Teacher Education Study, Phase II: Final Report (Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1975).
25.
The results of generic and specific variables in the ETS study came from my reading of a draft of their final report. McDonald (1975) did not discuss generic and specific results directly, but the lack of generic results is clear in that paper.
26.
Brophy and Evertson, op. cit
27.
Soar, op. cit
28.
Stallings and Kaskowitz, op. cit
29.
D.E. Wiley andA. Harnischfeger, "Explosion of a Myth: Quantity of Schooling and Exposure to Instruction, Major Educational Vehicles," Educational Researcher3 ( 1974): 7-12.
30.
Rosenshine and Furst, op.cit
31.
D. Walker andJ. Schaffarzick, "Comparing Curricula," Review of Educational Research44 ( 1974): 83-111.
32.
McDonald, et al., op. cit
33.
Flanders, N.A.Analyzing Classroom Behavior, New York: Addison-Wesley, 1970.
34.
Gall, M. et al. The Effects of Teacher Use of Questioning Techniques on Student Achievement and Attitudes. San Francisco, Calif.: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1975.
35.
Good, T.L. and Grouws, D.A.Process Product Relationships in 4th Grade Mathematics Classes. Columbia, Mo.: College of Education, University of Missouri, 1975.
36.
Rosenshine, B. and Martin, M. "Teacher Education and Teacher Behavior." Educational Researcher3 (1974): 11-14.
37.
Stallings, J.A. and Kaskowitz, D.H.Follow Through Classroom Observation Evaluation (1972-73). Menlo Park, Calif.: Stanford Research Institute , 1974.
38.
Tallmadge, K.The Development of Project Information Packages for Effective Approaches in Compensatory Education. Technical Report UR-254. Mountain View, Calif.: RMC Research Corp., 1974.
