Bills, Robert E., and others. Student Teacher Personality Change as a Function of the Personality of Supervising and Cooperating Teachers. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Cooperative Research Project S-020. Montgomery: Alabama State University, 1964.
2.
Claus, Karen.Effects of Modeling and Feedback Treatments on the Development of Teachers' Questioning Skills. Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, Technical Report No. 6. Stanford, Calif.; Stanford University, 1969.
3.
Dunham, D.R. "Attitudes of Student Teachers, College Supervisors and Supervising Teachers Toward Youth." Doctor's thesis. Bloomington: Indiana University, 1958. (Unpublished)
4.
Flint, Shirley H. "The Relationship Between Classroom Verbal Behavior of Student Teachers and the Classroom Verbal Behavior of Their Cooperating Teachers." ERIC Document 013788. Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse for Teacher Education, 1960.
5.
Koran, John J. "Two Paradigms for the Training of Science Teachers Using Videotape Technology and Simulated Conditions." Journal of Research in Science Teaching6: 22-28; 1969.
6.
Matthews, Charles C. "The Classroom Verbal Behavior of Selected Secondary School Science Teachers and Their Cooperating Classroom Teachers." Doctor's thesis. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, 1966. (Unpublished)
7.
McAulay, J.D. "How Much Influence Has A Cooperating Teacher ?" The Journal of Teacher Education11: 79-83; March 1960.
8.
McDonald, F.J. , and Allen, D.W.Training Effects of Feedback and Modeling Procedures on Teaching Performance. Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, Technical Report No. 3. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, 1967.
9.
McLeod, Richard J. "Changes in the Verbal Interactions Patterns of Secondary Science Student Teachers Who Have Had Training in Interaction Analysis and the Relationship of These Changes to the Verbal Interaction of Their Cooperating Teachers." Doctor's thesis. Ithaca, N.Y .: Cornell University, 1966. (Unpublished)
10.
McNeil, John. "Concomitants of Using Behavioral Objectives in the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness." Journal of Experimental Education36: 69-74; Fall 1967.
11.
Moskowitz, Gertrude. "The Attitudes and Teaching Patterns of Cooperating Teachers and Student Teachers Trained in Interaction Analysis." Interaction Analysis: Theory, Research, and Application. (Edited by E. Amidon and J. Hough.) Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1967.
12.
Nelson, Miles A. "The Effects of Two Post-Laboratory Discussion Strategies on Urban and Suburban Sixth-Grade Children's Learning of Selected Cognitive Skills and Science Principles." Doctor's thesis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1970. (Unpublished)
13.
Osman, R.V. "Associative Factors in Changes of Student Teachers' Attitudes During Student Teaching." Doctor's thesis. Bloomington: Indiana University, 1959. (Unpublished)
14.
Price, R.D. "The Influence of Supervising Teachers." The Journal of Teacher Education12: 471-75; December 1961,
15.
Salomon, G., and McDonald, F.J.Pre-and Posttest Reactions to Self-Viewing One's Teaching Performance on Videotape. Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, Research and Development Memoranda. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, 1969.
16.
Taba, Hilda; Levine, Samuel; and Elzey, Freeman F.Thinking in Elementary School Children. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Cooperative Research Project No. 1574. San Francisco, Calif.: San Francisco State College, 1963.
17.
Troisi, Nicholas. "Development of the Supervising Teacher's Role." The Supervising Teacher. Thirty-Eighth Yearbook. Cedar Falls, Iowa: Association for Student Teaching, 1959. pp. 18-23.
