Amidon, Edmund, and Powell, Evan. "Interaction Analysis as a Feedback System in Teacher Preparation." Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University, 1967. (Mimeographed)
2.
Flanders, N.A.Teacher Influence, Pupil Attitudes, and Achievement. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Cooperative Research Monograph No. 12. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1963.
3.
Furst, Norma. "The Effects of Training in Interaction Analysis on the Behavior of Student Teachers in Secondary Schools." A paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, February 1965.
4.
Hough, John B., and Amidon, E.J. "Behavior Change in Pre-Service Teacher Preparation: An Experimental Study." Philadelphia, Pa.: College of Education, Temple University, 1964.
5.
Hough, John B., and Ober, Richard. "The Effect of Training in Interaction Analysis on the Verbal Behavior of Teachers." A paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago , February 1966.
6.
Hough, John B., and others, "A Thirteen-Category Modification of Flanders' System of Interaction Analysis." Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University, 1965. (Mimeographed)
7.
Kirk, Jeffery. "The Effects of Teaching the Minnesota System of Interaction Analysis on the Behavior of Student Teachers." Doctor's thesis. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University, 1964. (Unpublished)
8.
Lantz, Donald L. "The Relationship of University Supervisors and Supervising Teachers' Ratings to Observed Student Teachers' Behavior." American Educational Research Journal4: 279-88; May 1967 .
9.
Lindquist, E.F.Design and Analysis of Experiments in Psychology and Education. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 1953. pp. 47-107.
10.
Scott, W.A. "Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Coding." The Public Opinion Quarterly19: 321-25 ; Fall 1955.
