Baxter, Bernice. "Rating Teachers' Personal Effectiveness." NEA Journal27:81; March 1938.
2.
Callis, R. "Change in Teacher-Pupil Attitudes Related to Training and Experi-
3.
ence." Educational and Psychological Measurement10: 718-27; 1950.
4.
Cook W.W.; Hoyt, C.J.; and Eikaas, A. "Studies of Predictive Validity of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory ." The Journal of Teacher Education7: 167-72; June 1956.
5.
Cook, W.W.; Leeds, C.H.; and Callis, R.Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1951.
6.
Della Piana, G.M., and Gage, N.L. "Pupils' Values and the Validity of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory." Journal of Educational Psychology46: 167-78; March 1955.
7.
Getzels, J.W., and Jackson, P.W. "The Teacher's Personality and Characteristics." Handbook of Research on Teaching. (Edited by N. L. Gage.) Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963. pp. 506-82.
8.
Guilford, J.P.Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. Fourth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
9.
Hoyt, C.J., and Cook, W.W. "The Stability of MTAI Scores During Two to Seven Years of Teaching ." The Journal of Teacher Education11: 487-91; December 1960.
10.
Leeds, C. H. AScale for Measuring Teacher-Pupil Attitudes and Teacher-Pupil Rapport. Psychological Monographs64, No. 6 (Whole No. 312). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association , 1950.
11.
______. "A Second Validity Study of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory." Elementary School Journal52: 398-405; March 1952.
12.
Scott, W.O.N. , and Brinkley, S.G. "Attitude Changes of Student Teachers and the Validity of the Minnesota Teacher Attitude Inventory." Journal of Educational Psychology51: 76-81; April 1960 .