Ausubel, D.P. "Learning by Discovery: Rationale and Mystique ." Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals45: 18-58; December 1961.
2.
—. "Some Psychological and Educational Limitations of Learning by Discovery." The Arithmetic Teacher11: 290-302 ; May 1964.
3.
Beberman, M.An Emerging Program of Secondary School Mathematics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958.
4.
Bellack, A.A., and others. The Language of the Classroom: Meanings Communicated in High School Teaching. Part Two. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Cooperative Research Report No. 2023. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University , 1965.
5.
Bruner, J.S. "The Act of Discovery." Harvard Educational Review31: 21-32; Winter 1961 .
6.
Davis, R.B.Elementary Mathematics Series: Axioms for Arithmetic and Algebra. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University, 1963.
7.
Della-Piana, G.M.; Eldredge, G.; and Worthen, B.R.Sequence Characteristics of Test Materials and Transfer of Learning. Part I: Experiments in Discovery Learning. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Cooperative Research Report No. 2277. Salt Lake City: Bureau of Educational Research , University of Utah, 1965.
8.
Fehr, H.F.Teaching High School Mathematics. What Research Says to the Teacher . Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1955.
9.
Flanders, Ned A.Teacher Influence, Pupil Attitudes, and Achievement. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Cooperative Research Monograph No. 12, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1965.
10.
Henderson, K.B. "Research on Teaching Secondary School Mathematics." Handbook of Research on Teaching. (Edited by N. L. Gage.) Chicago: Rand McNally , 1963. pp. 1007-30.
11.
Hendrix, Gertrude. "Learning by Discovery." The Mathematics Teacher54: 290-99; May 1961 .
12.
Hughes, M., and others. Development of the Means for the Assessment of the Quality of Teaching in Elementary Schools. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Cooperative Research Report No. 353. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, 1959.
13.
Kersh, B.Y. "Learning by Discovery: What Is Learned?" Speech given at Twenty-Third Summer Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, August 22, 1963.
14.
McCoy, M. Eleanor. "A Secondary School Mathematics Program." Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals43: 12-18; May 1959.
15.
McDonald, F.J. "Meaningful Learning and Retention: Task and Method Variables." Review of Educational Research34: 530-44; December 1964.
16.
Shaw, J.A. "A Student's Inventory of Teaching-Learning Processes: A Manual for Forms C & D." Greeley: Colorado State College, 1963. (Mimeographed)
17.
Suchman, J.R.The Elementary School Training Program in Scientific Inquiry. Urbana: University of Illinois , 1962.
18.
Wirtz, R.W.; Botel, M.; and Nunley, B.G.Discovery in Elementary School Mathematics: Classroom Training Units for Teachers of Modern Mathematics. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Press, 1963.
19.
Wittrock, M.C. "The Learning by Discovery Hypothesis." Learning by Discovery: A Critical Appraisal. (Edited by L. S. Shulman and E. R. Keislar.) Chicago : Rand McNally, 1966.
20.
Worthen, B.R. "Discovery vs. Expository Classroom Instruction: An Investigation of Teaching Mathematics in the Elementary School." Master's thesis. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, 1965.