Aurand, O.H.Evaluating Professional Service in Public Schools. Doctoral Dissertation Project, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1948. p. 80-85.
2.
Best, Leonard. "Incentive Pay for Teachers." (Summit, New Jersey: Summit Public Schools; May 11, 1954). Three-page mimeographed paper.
3.
Dickey, Frank G. "What Are Good Teachers Worth?" Phi Delta Kappan35: 185-87; January 1954.
4.
Fosdick, Harry A. "Merit Rating—How and By Whom?" The Nation's Schools57: 58-62; January 1956.
5.
Guhl, David C. "Merit Pay for Teachers." One-page mimeographed summary of a speech from the National School Boards Association 1957 Convention ; Atlantic City, February 1957.
6.
National Education Association, Department of Classroom Teachers and Research Division. "Teacher Rating ." Discussion Pamphlet No. 10; July 1954.
7.
Nicholas, Ivan C. "Salary Schedules Are Based on Effectiveness of Teaching." Nation's Schools57: 52-56; June 1956.
8.
Rast, G.E. "Teacher Ratings in Cities Over 50,000." Unpublished master's thesis, University of Chicago, 1933.
9.
Reavis, William C. and Cooper, Dan H. "Evaluation of Teacher Merit in City School Systems." Supplementary Educational Monographs 59 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1945) 138 p.
10.
Rose, Gale. "Merit Pay for Teachers." Three-page mimeographed summary of a speech from the National School
11.
Smith, John B. "Lexington Moves Toward Merit Rating." The American School Board Journal133:27-29; Novvember 1956.
12.
Staub, Fred and Savage, William W. "Teachers' Salaries and Merit Rating." Administrator's Notebook14; May 1956.
13.
Thorne, Edmund H. "A Plan That Really Works." The Gist26: 6-; February 1957.
14.
Turnbaugh, Roy C. "Recognizing Merit in Setting Salaries ." Phi Delta Kappan36: 165-66; January 1955.
15.
Yank, Elizabeth A. "Merit Pay for Teachers." One-page mimeographed summary of a speech from the National School Boards Association 1957 Convention ; Atlantic City, February 1957.
16.
Yeager, William A.Administration and the Teacher (New York: Harper and Bros., 1954) 557 p.
