This study examines the influence of personality-based matching in mentor-mentee pairings within a teacher residency program. Using the Big Five Personality traits, we investigated whether personality similarity and perceived similarity within mentor teacher (MT) and teacher resident (TR) dyads are associated with satisfaction in the mentoring partnership. Findings indicate that perceived similarity significantly enhances satisfaction, and when MT-TR pairs share at least one dominant Big Five personality trait, satisfaction with the match further increases. In addition, TRs report higher satisfaction when paired with MTs whose dominant personality trait is agreeableness, characterized by interpersonal warmth and collaboration. These results underscore the importance of considering personality traits in formal matching processes, providing actionable insights for residency program administrators. Intentional personality-based pairings may enhance the quality of mentoring relationships, fostering greater collaboration, communication, and support, contributing to improved mentoring outcomes and teacher development.
AbbasiZ.BillsberryJ.TodresM. (2024). Empirical studies of the “similarity leads to attraction” hypothesis in workplace interactions: A systematic review. Management Review Quarterly, 74, 661–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00313-5
2.
AfacanK. (2022). Teacher residency as an alternative teacher preparation program: A program review. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 11(3), 351–372.
3.
AllenT. D.EbyL. T.LentzE. (2006). Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.567
4.
AlonsoN.MarshallA.PorterC.KraigerK. (2024). Co-creating successful mentoring relationships? Investigating mentor and protege perceptions of dyadic fit and relationship quality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 39(6), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-02-2023-0084
5.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Clinical Practice Commission. (2018). A pivot toward clinical practice, its lexicon, and the renewal of educator preparation.
6.
Banerjee-BatistR.ReioT. G.Jr.RoccoT. S. (2019). Mentoring functions and outcomes: An integrative literature review of sociocultural factors and individual differences. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 114–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318810267
7.
BastianK. C.PattersonK. M.CarpenterD. (2020). Placed for success: Which teachers benefit from high-quality student teaching placements?Educational Policy, 36(7), 1583–1611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820951126
8.
BurgerJ. (2024). Constructivist and transmissive mentoring: Effects on teacher self-efficacy, emotional management, and the role of novices’ initial beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education, 75(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231185371
9.
ByrneD. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.
10.
ChangS.GoodwinA. L. (2023). Learning to co-teach: Understanding the co-in a mentored co-teaching activity. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 8(4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2023-0031
11.
ChenJ. L.MensahF. M. (2018). Teaching contexts that influence elementary pre-service science teachers’ teacher and science teacher identity development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(5), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1469187
12.
ChuY. (2020). Preservice teachers learning to teach and developing teacher identity in a teacher residency. Teaching Education, 32(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1724934
13.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (2008). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). In BoyleG. J.MatthewsG.SaklofskeD. H. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2. Personality measurement and testing (pp. 179–198). Sage.
14.
DengC.GulsurenD. B.TurnerN. (2022). How to match mentors and proteges for successful mentorship programs: A review of the evidence and recommendations for practitioners. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 43(2), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2021-0032
15.
DreerB. (2020). The significance of mentor-mentee relationship quality for student teachers’ well-being and flourishing during practical field experiences: A longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 1(10), 101–117.
16.
Dreer-GoetheB. (2023). Well-being and mentoring in pre-service teacher education: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 12(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-09-2022-0073
17.
EbyL. T.AllenT. D.HoffmanB. J.BaranikL. E.SauerJ. B.BaldwinS.MorrisonM. A.KinkadeK. M.MaherC. P.CurtisS.EvansS. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029279
18.
EnsherE. A.Grant-ValloneE. J.MarelichW. D. (2002). Effects of perceived attitudinal and demographic similarity on proteges’ support and satisfaction gained from their mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(2), 1407–1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01444.x
19.
Fisher-ariT. R.EatonA.DantzlerM. (2019). Mentor matching: Innovations in clinical practice across PDS networks. School-University Partnerships, 12(2), 94–100.
GiacumoL. A.ChenJ.Seguinot-CruzA. (2020). Evidence of the use of mentoring programs and practices to support workplace learning: A systematic multiple-studies review. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 33(3), 259–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21324
22.
GoldhaberD.KriegJ.TheobaldR. (2020). Effective like me? Does having a more productive mentor improve the productivity of mentees?Labour Economics, 63, 101792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101792
23.
GoldhaberD.RonfeldtM.CowanJ.GratzT.BardelliE.TruwitM. (2022). Room for improvement? Mentor teachers and the evolution of teacher preservice clinical evaluations. American Educational Research Journal, 59(5), 1011–1048. https://doi.org./10.3102/00028312211066867
24.
GuhaR.HylerM. E.Darling-HammondL. (2016). The teacher residency: An innovative model for preparing teachers. Learning Policy Institute.
25.
GuiseM.AmbrosoE.PauldingK.MooreC.HeggS. (2023). Preservice teacher reflection on coteaching implementation: Are we meeting the benchmarks?Journal of Teacher Education, 74(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221105807
IngersollR. M.StrongM. (2012). What the research tells us about the impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 114(14), 466–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211401411
28.
InzerL. D.CrawfordC. B. (2005). A review of formal and informal mentoring processes, problems, and designs. Journal of Leadership Education, 4(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.12806/V4/I1/TF2
29.
IzadiniaM. (2015). A closer look at the role of mentor teachers in shaping preservice teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.08.003
30.
IzadiniaM. (2016). Student teachers’ and mentor teachers’ perceptions and expectations of a mentoring relationships: Do they match or clash?Professional Development in Education, 42(3), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.994136
31.
KitchelT.TorresR. M. (2007). Possible factors in matching student teachers with cooperating teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(3), 13–24.
32.
KumariK.AliS. B.BatoolM.CiocaL.-I.AbbasJ. (2022). The interplay between leaders’ personality traits and mentoring quality and their impact on mentees’ job satisfaction and job performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 937470. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937470
33.
MarshallD. T.DivyaV.HopeS. T.AbramsL. M. (2020). The role of the mentor-resident match in a teacher residency program: A comparison of three cases. Journal of Research in Education, 29(2), 88–117.
34.
MastersonJ. E.CarrC. J.PettyE.StevensonH.YaromichA. (2024). Learning to teach in the 2020s: Four teacher candidates’ experiences amid challenging times. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, 104986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104733
35.
MatsklK. K.RondfeltM.NolanH. G.KlugmanJ.ReiningerM.BrockmanS. L. (2020). Cooperating teacher as model and coach: What leads to student teachers’ perceptions of preparedness?Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118791992
36.
MeddebS.St-JeanÉ.RauchA. (2024). The interaction of narcissism, agreeableness and conscientiousness in entrepreneurial mentoring: Implications for learning outcomes. International Small Business Journal, 42(6), 726–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426231223939
37.
MengesC. (2016). Toward improving the effectiveness of formal mentoring programs: Matching by personality matters. Group and Organization Management, 4(1), 98–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115579567
38.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096700
39.
MourlamD. J.De JongD.ShudakN. J.BaronM. (2019). A phenomenological case study of teacher candidate experiences during a yearlong teacher residency program. The Teacher Educator, 54(4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2019.1590750
40.
NiehoffB. P. (2006). Personality predictors of participation as a mentor. Career Development International, 11(4), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430610672531
41.
OwenC. J.SolomonL. Z. (2006). The importance of interpersonal similarities in the teacher mentor/protége relationship. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-2671-0
42.
RabinC. (2020). Co-teaching: Collaborative and caring teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119872696
43.
RaginsB. R. (2016). From the ordinary to the extraordinary: High-quality mentoring relationships at work. Organizational Dynamics, 45(3), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.07.008
44.
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
45.
RonfeldtM.BrockmanS. L.CampbellS. L. (2018). Does cooperating teachers’ instructional effectiveness improve preservice teachers’ future performance?Educational Researcher, 47, 405–418. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18782906
RonfeldtM.ReiningerM.KwokA. (2015). Teacher preparation programs and teacher labor markets: How social capital may help explain teachers’ career choices. Educational Researcher, 43(5), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109341149
48.
RonfeldtM.SchwartzN.JacobB. A. (2014). Does preservice preparation matter? Examining an old question in new ways. Teachers College Record, 116, 100305. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601002
49.
RonfeldtM. (2012). Where should student teachers learn to teach? Effects of field placement school characteristics on teacher retention and effectiveness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(1), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711420865
50.
SilvaT.McKieA.KnechtelV.GleasonP.MakowskyL. (2014). Teaching residency programs: A multisite look at a new model to prepare teachers for high-needs schools (NCEE2015-4002). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Science, U.S. Department of Education.
51.
SoslauE.Gallo-FoxJ.ScantleburyK. (2019). The promises and realities of implementing a coteaching model of student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117751399
52.
South Carolina Department of Education. (n.d.). South Carolina teaching standards 4.0 rubric. https://ed.sc.gov/
53.
TrippL. O.EickC. J. (2008). Match-making to enhance the mentoring relationship in student teaching: Learning from a simple personality instrument. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 1–26.
54.
TruwitM.RonfeldtM.BardelliE. (2024). Exploring Whether and How Teacher Residencies Offer a Different Kind of Preparation. AERA Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241231937
55.
TurbanD. B.LeeF. K. (2007). The role of personality in mentoring relationships: Formation, dynamics, and outcomes. In RaginsB. R.KramK. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 21–50). Sage.
56.
VagiR.PivovarovaM.Miedel BarnardW. (2019). Keeping our best? A survival analysis examining a measure of preservice teacher quality and teacher attrition. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117725025
57.
WatersL. (2004). Protégé–mentor agreement about the provision of psychosocial support: The mentoring relationship, personality, and workload. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(3), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.004
58.
WilsonA.HuynhM. (2020). Mentor-mentee relationships as anchors for preservice teachers coping on professional placement. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-04-2019-0052
59.
ZhengY.ZhengX.WuC.-H.YaoX.WangY. (2021). Newcomers’ relationship-building behavior, mentor information sharing and newcomer adjustment: The moderating effects of perceived mentor and newcomer deep similarity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 125, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103159
