Visions of teacher professionalism may shape common conceptualizations of high-quality mentoring, sometimes distortedly. Nevertheless, this relationship is often unnoticed, and studies rarely analyze mentor–teachers’ work according to their interrelating visions. This multiple case study aimed at this literature gap. It examined the goals that accomplished mentor-teachers promoted and their practices and found four mentoring styles that characterized these mentors. After, it interrogated how the mentoring styles interrelated with three distinct visions of teacher professionalism (teachers as intellectuals, craftspeople, or artists). Findings challenge the idea that mentor-teachers’ work can be evaluated as either advancing or degrading teacher professionalism. The study questions this framing of mentoring literature and suggests that a bipolar logic could mislead us to forsake essential aspects of mentoring, for instance, ones associated with apprenticeship relations. The study concludes by offering to replace the bipolar logic with a more balanced consideration of the different aspects of teacher mentoring.
AbbottA. D. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
2.
AgyemangF. G.BoatengH. (2019). Tacit knowledge transfer from a master to an apprentice among hairdressers. Education and Training, 61(1), 108–120.
3.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
4.
BartlettL.VavrusF. (2017). Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1(1), 5–17.
5.
BecherA.LefsteinA. (2021). Teaching as a clinical profession: Adapting the medical model. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(4), 477–488.
6.
BecherA.Orland-BarakL. (2018). Context Matters: Contextual Factors Informing Mentoring in Art Initial Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 477–492.
7.
BradburyL. U. (2010). Educative mentoring: promoting reform-based science teaching through mentoring relationships. Science Education, 94(6), 1049–1071.
8.
BulloughR. V.DraperR. J. (2004). Making sense of a failed triad: Mentors, university supervisors, and positioning theory. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(5), 407–420.
9.
CarmiT.TamirE. (2022). Three professional ideals: Where should teacher preparation go next?. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 173–192.
10.
CarmiT.TamirE. (2023). An emerging taxonomy explaining mentor-teachers’ role in student-teachers’ practicum: What they do and to what end?Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, Article 104121.
11.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
12.
ClarkeA.TriggsV.NielsenW. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163–202.
13.
ClarkeD.HollingsworthH. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.
14.
CohenD. K. (2011). Teaching and its predicaments. Harvard University Press.
15.
DeweyJ. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In C. A. McMurry (Ed.), The Third yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education: Part I: The Relation of theory to practice in the education of teachers (pp. 9–30). University of Chicago Press.
16.
EllisN. J.AlonzoD.NguyenH. T. M. (2020). Elements of a quality pre-service teacher mentor: A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, Article 103072.
17.
EtzioniA. (1969). The semi-professions and their organization: Teachers, nurses, social workers. Free Press.
18.
Feiman-NemserS. (1998). Teachers as teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 21(1), 63–74.
19.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17–30.
20.
Feiman-NemserS. (2008). Teacher learning: How do teachers learn to teach? In Cochran-Smith M., Feiman-Nemser S., McIntyre D. J., Demers K. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 696–705). Routledge.
21.
FreidsonE. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. University of Chicago Press.
22.
GrahamB. (2006). Conditions for successful field experiences: Perceptions of cooperating teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1118–1129.
23.
GreenwoodE. (1957). Attributes of a profession. Social Work, 2(3), 45–55.
24.
GuiseM.HabibM.ThiessenK.RobbinsA. (2017). Continuum of co-teaching implementation: Moving from traditional student teaching to co-teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 370–382.
25.
HiebertJ.GallimoreR.StiglerJ. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would It look like and how can we get one?Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
26.
IzadiniaM. (2015). A closer look at the role of mentor teachers in shaping preservice teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 1–10.
27.
LabareeD. (1992a). Doing good, doing science: The Holmes Group reports and the rhetorics of educational reform. Teachers College Record, 93(4), 628–640.
28.
LabareeD. (1992b). Power, knowledge, and the rationalization of teaching: A genealogy of the movement to professionalize teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 123–155.
29.
LabareeD. (2000). On the nature of teaching and teacher education difficult practices that look easy. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 228–233.
30.
LefsteinA. (2005). Thinking about the technical and the personal in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 333–356.
31.
LloydG. M.RiceC. L.McCloskeyA. V. (2020). Opportunities for professional learning about mathematics instruction: The role of joint work in student-teaching triads. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23, 499–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09439-y
32.
LoizouE. (2011). The diverse facets of power in early childhood mentor-student teacher relationships. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(4), 373–386.
33.
LunenbergM.KorthagenF. (2009). Experience, theory, and practical wisdom in teaching and teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 225–240.
34.
MatskoK. K.RonfeldtM.NolanH. G.KlugmanJ.ReiningerM.BrockmanS. L. (2020). Cooperating teacher as model and coach: What leads to student teachers’ perceptions of preparedness?Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 41–62.
35.
MaynardT.FurlongJ. (1995). Learning to teach and models of mentoring. In KerryT.MayesA. S. (Eds.), Issues in Mentoring (pp. 10–24). Routledge.
36.
NuthallG. (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 273–306.
37.
Orland-BarakL. (2014). Mediation in mentoring: A synthesis of studies in Teaching and Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 180–188.
38.
Orland-BarakL.HasinR. (2010). Exemplary mentors’ perspectives towards mentoring across mentoring contexts: Lessons from collective case studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 427–437.
39.
Orland-BarakL.WangJ. (2021). Teacher mentoring in service of preservice teachers’ learning to teach: Conceptual bases, characteristics, and challenges for teacher education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(1), 86–99.
40.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
41.
PhilpottC. (2017). Medical models for teachers’ learning: Asking for a second opinion. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(1), 20–31.
42.
SawyerR. K. (2011). Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
43.
SchonmannS. (2005). Theatrical representations of teaching as performance. In BrophyJ.PinnegarS. (Eds.), Learning from research on teaching: Perspective, methodology, and representation (pp. 283–311). Emerald Group Publishing.
44.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: A conception of teacher knowledge. American Educator, 10(1), 4–14.
45.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
46.
ShulmanL. S. (1998). Theory, practice and the education of professionals. The Elementary School Journal, 98(5), 511–526.
47.
ShulmanL. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.
48.
SmithJ.NadelsonL. (2016). Learning for you and learning for me: Mentoring as professional development for mentor teachers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(1), 59–72.
49.
StanulisR. N.WexlerL. J.PylmanS.GuentherA.FarverS.WardA.Croel-PerrienA.WhiteK. (2019). Mentoring as more than “cheerleading”: Looking at educative mentoring practices through mentors’ eyes. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 567–580.
50.
StiglerJ. W.ThompsonB. J. (2009). Thoughts on creating, accumulating, and utilizing shareable knowledge to improve teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 442–457.
51.
TamirE.HammernessK. (2014). Exemplary teaching. In Feiman-NemserS.TamirE.HammernessK. (Eds.), Inspiring teaching: Preparing teachers to succeed in mission-driven schools2 (pp. 123–146). Harvard Education Press.
52.
ThompsonM.SchademanA. (2019). Gaining fluency: Five practices that mediate effective co-teaching between pre-service and mentor teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102903.
53.
TownsendT. (2011). Searching high and searching low, searching east and searching west: Looking for trust in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(4), 483–499.
54.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
