Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Scholars have called for promoting coherence in teacher education programs. Such coherence is often depicted as a state to be achieved. This article reconceptualizes coherence as a dynamic process affected by the simultaneous organizational realities of unity, conflict, and fragmentation; it also aims to clarify factors that can facilitate or challenge the work of enhancing teacher education program coherence. Drawing on a case study of program-wide redesign, we show that promoting coherence requires more than just maximizing unity (instructors’ agreement on means and ends). It also requires addressing conflict and recognizing fragmentation in ways that support what we term “pathway flexibility.” By highlighting the interplay of unity, conflict, and fragmentation, we offer a set of conceptual tools to understand and support the development of program coherence in teacher education.

Keywords

preservice teacher education practice-based teacher education instructional practices

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achinstein

(2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 4212–4455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00168

American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education. (2018). A pivot towards clinical practice: A report of the AACTE clinical practice commission. https://aacte.org/resources/research-reports-and-briefs/clinical-practice-commission-report/

Anagnostopoulos

D.O.

Levine

T.H.

Roselle

R.S.

Lombardi

(2018). Learning to redesign teacher education: A conceptual framework to support program change. Teaching Education, 29(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2017.134974

Ball

D. L.

Forzani

F. M.

(2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479

Boerst

T. A.

Sleep

Ball

D. L.

Bass

(2011). Preparing teachers to lead mathematics discussions. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2844–2877. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111301207

Boscolo

Mason

(2003). Topic knowledge, text coherence, and interest: How they interact in learning from instructional texts. Journal of Experimental Education, 71(2), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970309602060

Brenner

M. E.

(2006). Interviewing in educational research. In Green

J. L.

Camilli

Elmore

P. B.

(Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 357–370). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874769

Canrinus

Klette

Hammerness

(2019). Diversity in coherence: Strengths and opportunities of three programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 70, 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117737305

Canrinus

E. T.

Bergem

O. K.

Klette

Hammerness

(2017). Coherent teacher education programmes: Taking a student perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1124145

10.

Carroll

Featherstone

Feiman-Nemser

Roosevelt

(2007). Transforming teacher education: Reflections from the field. Harvard University Press.

11.

Cochran-Smith

(2003). Learning and unlearning: the education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00091-4

12.

Cohen

M. D.

March

J. G.

Olsen

J. P

. (1976). People problems, solutions and the ambiguity of relevance. In March

J. G.

Olsen

J. P.

(Eds.), Ambiguity and choice in organizations (pp. 24–37). Universitetsforlaget.

13.

Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (n.d.). Standard 2: Clinical partnerships practice. http://caepnet.org/standards/2022-itp/standard-2#:~:text=R2.2%20Clinical%20Educators,12%20student%20learning%20and%20development

14.

De Voto

Olson

J. D.

Gottlieb

J. J

. (2021). Examining diverse perspectives of edTPA policy implementation across states: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120909390

15.

DuFour

Eaker

DuFour

(2005). On common ground. National Educational Service.

16.

Gappa

J. M.

Austin

A. E.

(2010). Rethinking academic traditions for twenty-first-century faculty. AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom, 1, 1–20.

17.

Grossman

Compton

Igra

Ronfeldt

Shahan

Williamson

(2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111, 2065–2100.

18.

Grossman

Hammerness

McDonald

(2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340

19.

Grossman

Hammerness

McDonald

Ronfeldt

(2008). Constructing coherence: Structural predictors of perceptions of coherence in NYC teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322127

20.

Hammerness

(2006). From coherence in theory to coherence in practice. Teachers College Record, 108(7), 1241–1265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00692.x

21.

Hammerness

(2012). A comparative study of three key features in the design and practice of teacher education in the United States and Norway: Part I. Findings from a study in the United States. Acta Didactica Norge, 6, 18.

22.

Hammerness

Klette

(2015). Indicators of quality in teacher education: Looking at features of teacher education from an international perspective. In LeTendre

G. K.

Wiseman

A. W.

(Eds.), Promoting and sustaining a quality teaching workforce (pp. 239–277). Emerald Group. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1479-367920140000027013/full/html

23.

Hermansen

(2019). In pursuit of coherence: Aligning program development in teacher education with institutional practices. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 936–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1639815

24.

Hignite

M.A.

Margavio

T.M.

Chin

J.M.

(2002). Assessing the conflict resolution profiles of emerging information systems professionals. Journal of Information Systems Education, 13, 315–325.

25.

Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group (ERIC database ED270454).

26.

Honig

M. I.

Hatch

T. C.

(2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008016

27.

Horn

I. S.

(2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1601_3

28.

Hurlbut

Krutka

(2020). Where do we start? Initiating a practice-based teacher education program around high-leverage practices. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 9(2), 169–199. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jtee/issue/56618/653811

29.

Janssen

Grossman

Westbroek

(2015). Facilitating decomposition and recomposition in practice-based teacher education: The power of modularity. Teaching & Teacher Education, 51, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.009

30.

Kang

Windschitl

(2018). How does practice-based teacher preparation influence novices’ first year instruction? Teachers College Record, 120, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000803

31.

Kavanagh

S. S.

Conrad

Dagogo-Jack

(2019). From rote to reasoned: Examining the role of pedagogical reasoning in practice-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, Article 102991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102991

32.

Kavanagh

S. S.

Metz

Hauser

Fogo

Westwood

M. W.

Carlson

(2019). Practicing responsiveness: Using approximations of teaching to develop teachers “responsiveness to students” ideas. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119841884

33.

Labaree

(2008). An uneasy relationship: The history of teacher education in the university. In Cochran-Smith

Feiman-Nemser

McIntyre

D. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 290–306). Routledge.

34.

Lampert

Franke

M. L.

Kazemi

Ghousseini

Turrou

A. C.

Beasley

Cunard

Crowe

(2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837

35.

Lang

M. W.

(2009). Conflict management: A gap in business education curricula. Journal of Education for Business, 84(4), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.4.240-245

36.

Levine

T. H

Bunch

G. C.

(2007). Community. In Pawan

Sietman

G. B.

(Eds.), For All our Students: Collaborative Partnerships among ESL and Classroom Teachers (pp. 117–140). TESOL.

37.

Levine

T.H.

Marcus

A.S.

(2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 389–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001

38.

Little

J. W.

(2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913–945.

39.

Lustig

D. C.

Strauser

D. R.

(2002). The relationship between sense of coherence and career thoughts. Career Development Quarterly, 51(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2002.tb00587.x

40.

Martin

(2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. SAGE.

41.

McDonald

Kazemi

Kavanagh

S. S.

(2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A Call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807

42.

McDonald

Kazemi

Kelley-Petersen

Mikolasy

Thompson

Valencia

S. W.

Windschitl

(2014). Practice makes practice: Learning to teach in teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89, 500–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.938997

43.

Meyer

J. W.

Rowan

(1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

44.

Mikkelsen

E. N.

Clegg

(2019). Conceptions of conflict in organizational conflict research: Toward critical reflexivity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617716774

45.

O’Neill

Allen

Hastings

(2013). Examining the “pros” and “cons” of team conflict: A team-level meta-analysis of task, relationship, and process conflict. Human Performance, 26, 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2013.795573

46.

Richmond

Bartell

Carter Andrews

D. J.

Neville

M. L.

(2019). Reexamining coherence in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 188–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119838230

47.

Schein

E. H.

(1985). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.

48.

Smagorinsky

Cook

L. S.

Jackson

A. Y.

Moore

Fry

P. G.

(2004). Tensions in learning to teach: Accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103260067

49.

Stosich

E. L.

Hatch

Hill

Roegman

Allen

(2021). Social networks and policy coherence: Administrators’ common core and teacher evaluation advice networks. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29, 60. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5990

50.

Tatto

(1996). Examining values and beliefs about teaching diverse students: Understanding the challenges for teacher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164554

51.

TeachingWorks.org. (n.d.). High-leverage practices. http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices

52.

Valencia

Martin

Place

Grossman

(2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109336543

53.

Yin

R. K.

(1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.

54.

Zarkadis

Stamovlasis

Papageorgiou

(2021). Studying the coherence of students’ portrayed representations of the atomic structure: Connections with conceptions and misconceptions. Science Education International, 32(2), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i2.10

55.

Zeichner

Tabachnik

B. R.

(1981). Are the effects of university teacher education “washed out” by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718103200302

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB

Exploring the Nature,Facilitators,and Challenges of Program Coherence in a Case of Teacher Education Program Redesign Using Core Practices

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material