The important role of individual differences in affecting teachers’ involvement in and professional development through research has received little systematic attention in theoretical discussions and empirical studies on teacher research. Therefore, relying on the available literature and our proposed theoretical models, we investigated the possible links among language teachers’ Big Five personality traits, motivation to conduct research (through self-determination theory’s intrinsic and extrinsic motivations alongside the avoidance motivation construct), and teacher research involvement (TRI). Using a survey method, data were gathered from 253 Iranian school English teachers (SETs) and subjected to correlational and structural equation modeling (SEM) analyses. Notably, SEM results demonstrated that Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism significantly predicted the motivational constructs which themselves predicted TRI. Moreover, the effects of these four traits on TRI were fully mediated through the motivational constructs. Implications for theory, policymaking, and professional development in the teacher research field are proposed.
AtayD. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62, 139–147.
2.
BabioneC. A. (2015). Practitioner teacher inquiry and research. John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BahramiV.HosseiniM.AtaiM. R. (2019). Exploring research-informed practice in English for academic purposes: A narrative study. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 152–165.
4.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359–372.
5.
BorgS. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30, 358–388.
6.
BorgS. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43, 391–429.
7.
BorgS.LiuY. (2013). Chinese college English teachers’ research engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 270–299.
8.
BorgS.SanchezH. S. (2015) (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher research. Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BoyleG. J.MatthewsG.SaklofskeD. H. (2008). Personality theories and models: An overview. In BoyleG. J.MatthewsG.SaklofskeD. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 1–29). SAGE.
10.
BurnsA. (2013). Qualitative teacher research. In ChapelleC. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 4816–4823). Wiley-Blackwell.
11.
CerasoliC. P.AlligerG. M.DonsbachJ. S.MathieuJ. E.TannenbaumS. I.OrvisK. A. (2018). Antecedents and outcomes of informal learning behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 203–230.
12.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2018). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
13.
ColeD. A.PreacherK. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: Potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19, 300–315.
14.
CortinaJ. M.IngerickM. J. (2005). Personality in industrial/organizational psychology: Not much more than cheese. In HodgkinsonG. P.FordJ. K. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 119–148). John Wiley & Sons.
15.
DeckersL. (2018). Motivation: Biological, psychological, and environmental (5th ed.). Routledge.
16.
DeemerE. D.MartensM. P.BuboltzW. C. (2010). Toward a tripartite model of research motivation: Development and initial validation of the research motivation scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 292–309.
17.
DehghanF.SahragardR. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers’ views on action research and its application in their classrooms: A case study. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 4, 39–52.
18.
EdwardsE. (2021). The ecological impact of action research on language teacher development: A review of the literature. Educational Action Research, 29(3), 396–413.
19.
ElliotA. J.SheldonK. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 171–185.
20.
ElliotA. J.ThrashT. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.
21.
FosterP. (1999). “Never mind the quality, feel the impact”: A methodological assessment of teacher research sponsored by the Teacher Training Agency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47, 380–398.
22.
FurnhamA. (2005). The psychology of behaviour at work: The individual in the organization. Psychology Press.
23.
GaoX.BarkhuizenG.ChowA. (2011). “Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient”: Understanding primary school English teachers’ conceptions of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research, 15, 61–81.
24.
GholamiK. h.MehrmohammadiM. (2014). Teacher researcher: An epistemic pedagogy for reconstructing teacher professional identity in Iran. International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies, 22, 329–351.
25.
GilchristG. (2018). Practitioner enquiry: Professional development with impact for teachers, schools and systems. Routledge.
26.
GoreJ. M.ZeichnerK. M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 119–136.
27.
GorozidisG.PapaioannouA. G. (2014). Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1–11.
GurvenM.Von RuedenC.MassenkoffM.KaplanH.Lero VieM. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.
30.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
31.
HezlettS. A.McCauleyC. D. (2018). Employee development: The process and practice of work-related learning. In OnesD. S.AndersonN.ViswesvaranC.SinangilH. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 235–265). SAGE.
32.
HodkinsonH.HodkinsonP. (2005). Improving school teachers’ workplace learning. Research Papers in Education, 20, 109–131.
33.
HosseiniM.BahramiV. (2022). Adaptation and validation of the research motivation scale for language teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90, 229–248.
34.
JacksonD. L.VothJ.FreyM. P. (2013). A note on sample size and solution propriety for confirmatory factor analytic models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 86–97.
35.
JamesF.AugustinD. S. (2018). Improving teachers’ pedagogical and instructional practice through action research: Potential and problems. Educational Action Research, 26, 333–348.
36.
JamesL. R.MulaikS. A.BrettJ. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233–244.
37.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2009). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). Guilford Press.
38.
JugovićI.MarušićI.IvanecT.VidovićV. (2012). Motivation and personality of preservice teachers in Croatia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 271–287.
39.
KennedyA. (2014). Understanding continuing professional development: The need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional Development in Education, 40, 688–697.
40.
KincheloeJ. L. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. Routledge.
41.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
42.
KrilleC. (2020). Teachers’ participation in professional development: A systematic review. Springer.
43.
KyndtE.GijbelsD.GrosemansI.DoncheV. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86, 1111–1150.
44.
LiangJ.LawrenceR. H.BennettJ. M.WhitelawN. A. (1990). Appropriateness of composites in structural equation models. Journal of Gerontology, 45, 52–59.
45.
LiC. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21, 369–387.
46.
LiN.BarrickM. R.ZimmermanR. D.ChiaburuD. S. (2014). Retaining the productive employee: The role of personality. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 347–395.
47.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2004). What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29, 388–403.
48.
LohmanM. C. (2005). A survey of factors influencing the engagement of two professional groups in informal workplace learning activities. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 501–527.
49.
MajorD. A.TurnerJ. E.FletcherT. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the big five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 927–935.
50.
MaurerT. J.LippstreuM.JudgeT. A. (2008). Structural model of employee involvement in skill development activity: The role of individual differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 336–350.
51.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2013). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
52.
McKernanJ. (2008). Curriculum and imagination: Process theory, pedagogy and action research. Routledge.
53.
MehraniM. B. (2015). English teachers’ research engagement. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3, 83–97.
54.
MertlerA. C. (2018). Action research communities: Professional learning, empowerment, and improvement through collaborative action research. Routledge.
55.
MurphyK. R. (2002). Individual differences can both facilitate and limit individual development. In PearnM. (Ed.), Individual differences and development in organisations (pp. 53–70). John Wiley & Sons.
56.
MuthénB.MuthénL. (2019). Mplus: A general latent variable modeling program (Version 8.3). Muthén & Muthén.
57.
NassajiH. (2012). The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 16, 337–365.
58.
NoeR. A.TewsM. J.MarandA. D. (2013). Individual differences and informal learning in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 327–335.
59.
PattersonF. (2002). Great minds don’t think alike? Person-level predictors of innovation at work. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 17, 115–144.
60.
PituchK. A.StevensJ. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS. Routledge.
61.
RaineyI. (2000). Action research and the English as a foreign language practitioner: Time to take stock. Educational Action Research, 8, 65–91.
62.
RichardsJ. C. (2008). Second language teacher education today. RELC Journal, 39, 158–177.
63.
RichterD.KleinknechtM.GröschnerA. (2019). What motivates teachers to participate in professional development? An empirical investigation of motivational orientations and the uptake of formal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 1–8.
64.
RitcheyJ. (2008). The statistical imagination: Elementary statistics for the social sciences. McGraw-Hill.
65.
RoseH. (2019). Dismantling the ivory tower in TESOL: A renewed call for teaching-informed research. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 895–905.
66.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.
67.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
68.
SomekhB.ZeichnerK. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17, 5–21.
69.
StenhouseL. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. Heinemann.
70.
ThompsonT. (2004). Failure–avoidance: Parenting, the achievement environment of the home and strategies for reduction. Learning and Instruction, 14, 3–26.
71.
van DaalT.DoncheV.De MaeyerS. (2014). The impact of personality, goal orientation and self-efficacy on participation of high school teachers in learning activities in the workplace. Vocations and Learning, 7, 21–40.
72.
van de VijverF. J. (2016). Test adaptations. In LeongF. T. L.BartramD.CheungF. M.GeisingerK. F.IliescuaD. (Eds.), The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 364–376). Oxford University Press.
73.
VuM. T. (2020). Between two worlds? Research engagement dilemmas of university English language teachers in Vietnam. RELC Journal, 52, 1–14.
74.
WatanabeS.TareqM.KanazawaY. (2011). When openness to experience and conscientiousness affect continuous learning: A mediating role of intrinsic motivation and a moderating role of occupation. Japanese Psychological Research, 53, 1–14.
75.
XuY. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity construction. Language Teaching Research, 18, 242–259.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
