A quasi-experimental mixed-methods study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an equity intervention on teacher candidates’ abilities to articulate equity-based beliefs, and demonstrate and apply equity-based skills and knowledge. Three pre/post instruments were utilized. Treatment participants (N = 35) were exposed to curricular modifications made to the traditional curriculum, including a workshop, panel event, online learning modules, and reflective postconferences. Quantitative findings showed a statistically significant treatment effect for treatment participants compared with candidates in the control group (N = 83). Qualitative analyses showed that treatment participants articulated more equity-based language when describing their beliefs and intentions for their future classroom communities. Implications for practice and research are provided.
AgarwalR.EpsteinS.OppenheimR.OylerC.SonuD. (2010). From ideal to practice and back again: Beginning teachers teaching for social justice. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 237–247.
2.
AllwrightR. (1980). Turns, topics and tasks: Patterns of participation in language learning and teaching. In Larsen-FreemanD. (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 165–187). Newbury House.
3.
AndersonL.BurnsR. (1989). Research in classrooms: The study of teachers, teaching, and instruction. Elmsford, New York: Pergamon Press.
4.
AronsonB.LaughterJ. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86, 1163–1206.
5.
BellN. S.CoddingD. (2021). Equity Scenario Response Survey: Understanding teacher candidates’ preparation of their sociopolitical identity. Urban Education. Advance online publication.
6.
CabreraN.MilemF.JaquetteO.MarxR. (2014). Missing the (student achievement) forest for all the (political) trees: Empiricism and the Mexican American studies controversy in Tucson. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1084–1118.
7.
Cochran-SmithM. (2001). Learning to teach against the (new) grain. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 3–3.
8.
Cochran-SmithM.EllF.GrudnoffL.HaighM.HillM.LudlowL. (2016). Initial teacher education: What does it take to put equity at the center?Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 567–578.
9.
Cochran-SmithM.LudlowL.EllF.O’LearyM.EnterlineS. (2012). Learning to teach for social justice as a cross cultural concept: Findings from three countries. Journal of Educational Research, 1, 171–198.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
11.
CreswellJ.CreswellJ. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
12.
DixsonA.RousseauC. (2005). And we are still not saved: Critical race theory in education ten years later. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8, 17–27.
13.
Duncan-AndradeJ. (2007). Gangstas, wankstas, and ridas: Defining, developing, and supporting effective teachers in urban schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(6), 617–638.
14.
EnterlineS.Cochran-SmithM.LudlowL.MitescuE. (2008). Learning to teach for social justice: Measuring change in the beliefs of teacher candidates. The New Educator, 4, 267–290.
15.
FordD.RussoC. (2016). Historical and legal overview of special education overrepresentation: Access and equity denied. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 16, 150–157.
16.
FreireP. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed (50th anniversary ed.) (RamosM., Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic.
17.
GayG. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.
18.
GillbornD.WarmingtonP.DemackS. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, “big data” and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179.
19.
GisevN.BellJ. S.ChenT. F. (2013). Inter- rater agreement and inter-rater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 9, 330–338.
20.
GorskiP.PothiniS. (2014). Case studies on diversity and social justice education. Routledge.
21.
GorskiP.SwalwellK. (2015). Equity literacy for all. Educational Leadership, 72(6), 34–40.
22.
GreenwaldA.BanajiM. (2017). The implicit revolution: Reconceiving the relation between conscious and unconscious. American Psychologist, 72, 861–871.
23.
House-NiamkeS.SatoT. (2019). Resistance to systemic oppression by students of color in a diversity course for preservice teachers. Educational Studies: Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 55(2), 160–179.
24.
HowardT. (2001). Telling their side of the story: African-American students’ perceptions of culturally relevant teaching. Urban Review, 33(2), 131–149.
25.
HowardT.Rodriguez-MinkoffA. (2017). Culturally relevant pedagogy 20 years later: Progress of pontificating? what have we learned, and where do we go?Teachers College Record, 119(1), 8–8.
26.
KapustkaK.HowellP.ClaytonC.ThomasS. (2009). Social justice in teacher education: A qualitative content analysis of NCATE conceptual frameworks. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42, 4489–4505.
27.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 3465–3491.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 147–168.
30.
LarriveeB. (2008). Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 9, 3341–3360.
31.
LudlowL.EnterlineS.Cochran-SmithM. (2008). Learning to Teach for Social Justice-Beliefs Scale: An application of Rasch measurement principles. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 40(4), 194–214.
32.
McGeeE.AlverezA.MilnerH. (2016). Colorism as a salient space for understanding in teacher preparation. Theory into Practice, 55(1), 69–79.
33.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
34.
MillsC.BallantyneJ. (2016). Social justice and teacher education: A systematic review of empirical work in the field. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 4263–4276.
35.
MilnerH. (2008a). Critical race theory and interest convergence as analytic tools in teacher education polices. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 332–346.
36.
MilnerH. (2008b). Disrupting deficit notions of difference: Counter-narratives of teachers and community in urban education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1573–1598.
37.
MilnerH. (2010). What does teacher education have to do with teaching? Implications for diversity studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 118–131.
38.
MilnerH. (2011). Culturally relevant pedagogy in a diverse Urban Classroom. The Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, 43, 166–189.
39.
MilnerH. (2012). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6), 693–718.
40.
MilnerH. (2017). Where’s the race in culturally relevant pedagogy?Teachers College Record, 119(1), 3–3.
41.
MilnerH.HowardT. (2013). Counter-narrative as method: Race, policy and research for teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(4), 536–561.
42.
PollockM.DeckmanS.MiraM.ShalabyC. (2010). “But what can I do?”: Three necessary tensions in teaching teachers about race. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(3), 211–224.
43.
SablanJ. (2019). Can you really measure that? combining critical race theory and quantitative methods. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 178–203.
44.
SleeterC. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: Research and the overwhelming presence of whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 94–106.
45.
SleeterC. (2016). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 294–106.
46.
SleeterC. (2017). Critical race theory and the whiteness of teacher education. Urban Education, 52(2), 155–169.
47.
SoslauE.BellN. (2018). The challenges of supporting equity literacy skill development in White teacher candidates: A self-study of two White field instructors. Studying Teacher Education, 14, 156–173.
48.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th. ed.). Pearson.
49.
TateW. (1995). Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 166–173.
50.
TitscherS.MeyerM.WodakR.VetterE. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. SAGE Publications.
51.
VillegasA.LucasT. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 120–132.
52.
WorthamS.ContrerasM. (2002). Struggling toward culturally relevant pedagogy in the Latino diaspora. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1(2), 133–144.
53.
YoungE. (2010). Challenges to conceptualizing and actualizing culturally relevant pedagogy: How viable is the theory in classroom practice?Journal of Teacher Education, 61(3), 248–260.
54.
ZeichnerK. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89–99.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
