In this study, we investigated how an experienced fourth-grade teacher responded to her students’ thinking as part of her teacher noticing practice in a formative assessment context. Our primary purpose in doing this work was to decompose the responding component of teacher noticing and use our findings to present an emerging framework characterizing the multidimensional nature of this practice. We present two key outcomes based on the findings of this work. First, we show how a formative assessment context situated outside of instruction can engage teachers in practice-based noticing. Second, we present an emerging framework of the responding component of teacher noticing and discuss how it can be used by teacher educators to engage teachers in analytic work in ways that reveal the relationships between what teachers see in students’ thinking and how, when, and toward whom they respond.
AlonzoA. (2018). An argument for formative assessment with science learning progressions. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 104–112.
2.
BallD.CohenD. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice, 1, 3–22.
3.
BarnhartT.van EsE. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93.
4.
BennettR. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.
5.
BlackP.WiliamD. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
6.
BlackP.WiliamD. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
7.
BulduM. (2010). Making learning visible in kindergarten classrooms: Pedagogical documentation as a formative assessment technique. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1439–1449.
8.
Calabrese-BartonA.TanE. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73.
9.
CoffeyJ.HammerD.LevinD.GrantT. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136.
10.
DiniV.SevianH.CaushiK.Orduña PicónR. (2020). Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers. Science Education, 104, 290–325.
11.
DixsonD.WorrellF. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 55(2), 153–159.
12.
FurtakE.HerediaS. (2014). Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 982–1020.
13.
FurtakE.ThompsonJ.van EsE. (2016, April). Formative assessment and noticing: Toward a synthesized framework for attending and responding during instruction [Conference session]. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, United States.
14.
GoldsmithL.SeagoN. (2011). Using classroom artifacts to focus teachers’ noticing: Affordances and opportunities. In SherinM.JacobsV.PhilippR. (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 169–187). Routledge.
15.
GotwalsA.BirminghamD. (2016). Eliciting, identifying, interpreting, and responding to students’ ideas: Teacher candidates’ growth in formative assessment practices. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 365–388.
16.
GrossmanP.ComptonC.IgraD.RonfeldtM.ShahanE.WilliamsonP. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
17.
HaverlyC.Calabrese-BartonA.SchwarzC.BraatenM. (2020). “Making space”: How novice teachers create opportunities for equitable sense-making in elementary science. Journal of Teacher Education, 72, 63–79.
18.
JacobsV.AmbroseR. (2008). Making the most of story problems. Teaching Children Mathematics, 15(5), 260–266.
19.
JacobsV.EmpsonS. (2016). Responding to children’s mathematical thinking in the moment: An emerging framework of teaching moves. ZDM, 48(1–2), 185–197.
20.
JacobsV.LambL.PhilippR. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169–202.
21.
KangH.AndersonC. (2015). Supporting preservice science teachers’ ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99(5), 863–895.
22.
LevinD.HammerD.CoffeyJ. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154.
23.
LunaM. J. (2018). What does it mean to notice my students’ ideas in science today?: An investigation of elementary teachers’ practice of noticing their students’ thinking in science. Cognition and Instruction, 36(4), 297–329.
24.
LunaM. J.SelmerS.RyeJ. (2018). Teachers’ noticing of students’ thinking in science through classroom artifacts: In what ways are science and engineering practices evident?Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29, 148–172.
25.
LunaM. J.SherinM. G. (2017). Using a video club design to promote teacher attention to students’ ideas in science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 282–294.
26.
MartínezJ.BorkoH.StecherB. (2012). Measuring instructional practice in science using classroom artifacts: Lessons learned from two validation studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 38–67.
27.
MyranS.CrumK.ClaytonJ. (2010). Four pillars of effective university-school district partnerships: Implications for educational planning. Educational Planning, 19(2), 46–60.
28.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
29.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
30.
RobertsonA.ScherrR.HammerD. (Eds.). (2016). Responsive teaching in science and mathematics. Routledge.
31.
RoseberyA.WarrenB.Tucker-RaymondE. (2016). Developing interpretive power in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1571–1600.
32.
Ruiz-PrimoM.FurtakE. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84.
33.
SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
34.
SchackE.FisherM.WilhelmJ. (Eds.). (2017). Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks. Springer.
35.
ScribnerJ. P. (2003). Do-it-yourselfers or engineers? Bricolage as a metaphor for teacher work and learning. [Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
36.
SchwarzC.BraatenM.HaverlyC.Calabrese-BartonA.de los SantosE. (2018). Sense-making moments: Elementary teachers’ responsiveness towards disciplinary and equitable aspects of scientific sense-making [Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA, United States.
37.
SherinB.StarJ. (2011). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In SherinM.JacobsV.PhilippR. (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 96–108). Routledge.
38.
SherinM.HanS. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163–183.
SherinM.LinsenmeierK.van EsE. (2009). Selecting video clips to promote mathematics teachers’ discussion of student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 213–230.
41.
SherinM.van EsE. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.
42.
SimpsonA.HaltiwangerL. (2017). “This is the first time I’ve done this”: Exploring secondary prospective mathematics teachers’ noticing of students’ mathematical thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(4), 335–355.
43.
TalanquerV.BolgerM.TomanekD. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers’ assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 585–609.
44.
TeuscherD.LeathamK.PetersonB. (2017). From a framework to a lens: Learning to notice student mathematical thinking. In SchackE. O.FisherM. H.WilhelmJ. A. (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 31–48). Springer.
45.
van EsE. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In SherinM.JacobsV.PhilippR. (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). Routledge.
46.
van EsE.SherinM. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276.
47.
van EsE.SherinM. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155–176.
48.
WiliamD. (2009). An integrative summary of research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In AndradeH.CizekG. J. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18–40). Routledge.
49.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM.StroupeD. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.
50.
YinR. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.
