Nontraditional teacher preparation pathways were designed to offer different forms of preparation meant to attract different populations of teachers; however, prior literature suggests they may not provide as much of an alternative as initially intended. Drawing on surveys of nearly 800 preservice student teachers and their mentor teachers, we offer a descriptive overview comparing traditional, alternative, and residency pathways preparing teachers in Chicago Public Schools. Our study provides evidence that nontraditional forms of teacher preparation in Chicago do indeed provide unique routes of entry into the profession. We find substantive differences in the kinds of preparation that these pathways offer, including features of preparation such as program and student teaching duration and methods course load, which are often assumed to differ. We also find differences in features not historically studied including mentor characteristics and experiences, types of mentoring provided, and supports received by mentors.
BastianK. C.SunM.LynnH. (2019). What do surveys of program completers tell us about teacher preparation quality?Journal of Teacher Education, 72, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119886294
2.
BerryB. (2005). The future of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 272–278.
3.
BerryB.MontgomeryD.SnyderJ. (2008). Urban teacher residency models and institutes of higher education: Implications for teacher preparation. Center for Teaching Quality.
4.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
5.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RockoffJ.WyckoffJ. (2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 793–818.
6.
BoydH.GrossmanP.HammernessK.LankfordH.LoebS.RonfeldtM.WyckoffJ. (2012). Recruiting effective math teachers: Evidence from New York City. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1008–1047.
7.
ClarkM. A.ChiangH. S.SilvaT.McConnellS.SonnenfeldK.ErbeA.PumaM. (2013). The Effectiveness of Secondary Math Teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows Programs. NCEE 2013–4015. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
8.
ClotfelterC.LaddH.VigdorJ. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. The Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655–681.
9.
ConklinH.GattiL.MatskoK. K. (2019). Teaching towards what ends? Residency candidates navigating competing programmatic aims. In LubienskiC. A.BrewerT. J. (Eds.), Learning to teach in an era of privatization: Global trends in teacher preparation (pp. 149–170). Teachers College Press.
10.
Darling-HammondL.ChungR.FrelowF. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach?Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286–302.
11.
Darling-HammondL.HoltzmanD. J.GatlinS. J.HeiligJ. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach For America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 2–50.
12.
DonaldsonM. L.JohnsonS. M. (2011). Teach For America teachers: How long do they teach? Why do they leave?Phi Delta Kappan, 93(2), 47–51.
13.
GarciaE.WeissE. (2019). U.S. schools struggle to hire and retain teachers: The second report in “The Perfect Storm in the Teacher Labor Market” series. Economic Policy Institute.
14.
GattiL. (2014). Negotiating conflicting frames of experience: Learning to teach in an urban teacher residency. In EllisV.OrchardJ. (Eds.), Learning teaching from experience: Multiple perspectives and international contexts (pp. 207–222). Bloomsbury.
15.
GlazermanS.MayerD.DeckerP. (2006). Alternative routes to teaching: The impacts of Teach for America on student achievement and other outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 75–96.
16.
GoldsteinD. (2014). The teacher wars: A history of America’s most embattled profession. Doubleday.
17.
GrissomJ. A. (2008). But do they stay? Addressing issues of teacher retention through alternative certification. In GrossmanP.LoebS. (Eds.), Alternate routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education (pp. 129–156). Harvard Education Press.
18.
GrossmanP.LoebS. (2008). Alternative routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education. Harvard Education Press.
19.
GuarinoC. M.HamiltonL. S.LockwoodJ. R.RathbunA. H. (2006). Teacher qualifications, instructional practices, and reading and mathematics gains of kindergartners: Research and development report (NCES 2006-031). National Center for Education Statistics.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.O’BrienD. M.RivkinS. G. (2005). The Market for Teacher Quality. NBER Working Paper No. 11154. National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
HenryG. T.PurtellK. M.BastianK. C.FortnerC. K.ThompsonC. L.CampbellS. L.PattersonK. M. (2014). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 7–23.
23.
HumphreyD. C.WechslerM. E. (2008). Getting beyond the label: What characterizes alternative certification programs. In GrossmanP.LoebS. (Eds.), Alternative routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education (pp. 65–98). Harvard Education Press.
24.
HumphreyD. C.WeschlerM. E.HoughH. J. (2008). Characteristics of effective alternative teacher certification programs. Teachers College Record, 110(4), 1–63.
25.
KaneT. J.RockoffJ. E.StaigerD. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education review, 27(6), 615–631.
26.
KlagoholzL. (2000). Growing teachers in the Garden State. Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
27.
MatskoK. K.HammernessK. (2014a). Preparing teachers for the Chicago Public Schools. In Feiman-NemserS.TamirE.HammernessK. (Eds.), Inspiring teaching: Preparing teachers to succeed in mission-driven schools (pp. 17–32). Harvard Educational Press.
28.
MatskoK. K.HammernessK. (2014b). Unpacking the “urban” in urban teacher education: Making a case for context-specific preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113511645
29.
MatskoK. K.RonfeldtM.GreeneH.KlugmanJ.ReiningerM.BrockmanS. (2018). Cooperating teacher as model and coach: What leads to student teachers’ perceptions of preparedness?Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118791992
30.
McFarlandJ.HussarB.WangX.ZhangJ.WangK.RathbunA.BarmerA.Forrest CataldiE.Bullock MannF. (2018). The condition of education 2018 (NCES 2018-144). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018144.pdf
31.
MonkD. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125–145.
PapayJ.WestM.FullertonJ.KaneT. (2012). Does an urban teacher residency increase student achievement? Early evidence from Boston. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 413–434.
34.
PerlsteinL.JeraldC.DuffrinE. (2014). Building effective teacher residencies. Urban Teacher Residency United.
35.
ReddingC.SmithT. M. (2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates?American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1086–1125.
36.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813
37.
RonfeldtM.MatskoK. K.Greene NolanH.ReiningerM. (2020). Three different measures of graduates’ instructional readiness and the features of preservice preparation that predict them. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120919753
SilvaT.McKieA.KnechtelV.GleasonP.MakowskyL. (2014). Teaching residency programs: A multisite look at a new model to prepare teachers for high-need schools. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.
SolomonJ. (2009). The Boston Teacher Residency: District-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 478–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109349915
42.
StoddartT.FlodenR. (1995). Traditional and alternative routes to teacher certification: Issues, assumptions and misconceptions. In ZeichnerK.MelnickS.GomezM. L. (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 80–106). Teachers College Press.
43.
VillegasA. M.LucasT. F. (2004). Diversifying the teacher workforce: A retrospective and prospective analysis. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 103(1), 70–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00031.x
WilliamsonP.ApedoeX.ThomasC. (2016). Context as content in urban teacher education: Learning to teach in and for San Francisco. Urban Education, 51(10), 1170–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915623342
46.
ZeichnerK.HutchinsonE. A. (2008). The development of alternative certification policies and programs in the United States. In GrossmanP.LoebS. (Eds.), Alternate routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education (pp. 15–30). Harvard Education Press.
47.
ZientekL. R. (2007). Preparing high-quality teachers: Views from the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 959–1001.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
