English Learner-classified (ELC) students are one of the nation’s most marginalized student populations. One promising but understudied strategy to strengthen teaching of ELC students is teacher induction. This article examines the role of teacher induction in strengthening novice teachers’ EL-specific teaching knowledge and skills. Through a detailed analysis of induction in California, we find that the state has little external assurance that teachers who have undergone induction can meet ELC students’ unique and diverse needs. California’s decentralized, flexible, teacher-led induction may support teachers’ development of general teaching skills, but misses an opportunity to support teachers in an area where many of them struggle. The study raises other problematic issues around mentoring for equity such as monolithic views of ELC students, lack of timely and actionable information about language proficiency, and lack of guidance as to what constitutes acceptable evidence of competency teaching ELC students.
AbellS. K.DillonD. R.HopkinsC. J.McInerneyW. D. O.BrienD. G. (1995). “Somebody to count on”: Mentor/intern relationships in a beginning teacher internship program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(2), 173–188.
2.
AchinsteinB.AthanasesS. Z. (2010). Mentoring for equity: Focusing new teachers on English language learners. In WangJ.OdellS. J.CliftR. T.AchinsteinB. (Eds.), Past, present, and future research on teacher induction: An anthology for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners (pp. 187–204). Rowman & Littlefield Education.
3.
BianchiniJ. A.BrennerM. E. (2010). The role of induction in learning to teach toward equity: A study of beginning science and mathematics teachers. Science Education, 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20353
4.
BoydD.GrossmanP.IngM.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2011). The Influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210380788
5.
BulloughR. V. (2012). Mentoring and new teacher induction in the United States: A review and analysis of current practices. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645600
CheruvuR.Souto-ManningM.LenclT.Chin-CalubaquibM. (2015). Race, isolation, and exclusion: What early childhood teacher educators need to know about the experiences of pre-service teachers of color. The Urban Review, 47(2), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014-0291-8
9.
Cochran-SmithM.VillegasA. M.AbramsL.Chavez-MorenoL.MillsT.SternR. (2015). Critiquing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, Part II. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 109–121.
10.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE.
11.
CreswellJ. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
CTC. (2019b). Report of the site visit team to Etiwanda School District. CTC.
31.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). Recognizing and developing effective teaching: What policy makers should know and do. The American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE).
32.
EchevarriaJ.VogtM.ShortD. J. (2017). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (5th ed.). Pearson.
33.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic field notes (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
34.
EngeströmY. (1999). Ch. 1. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In EngeströmY.MiettinenR.PunamakiR. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press.
35.
FaltisC. J.ValdésG. (2016). Preparing teachers for teaching in and advocating for linguistically diverse classrooms: A Vade mecum for teacher educators. In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 549–592). http://ebooks.aera.net/HRTCH8
36.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
37.
GándaraP.Maxwell-JollyJ.DriscollA. (2005). Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs (pp. 1–32). The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
38.
GándaraP.RumbergerR.Maxwell-JollyJ.CallahanR. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36), 1–52.
39.
GándaraP.SantibañezL. (2016). The teachers our English language learners need. Educational Leadership, 73(5), 32–37.
40.
GarcíaE.WeissE. (2019). The role of early career supports, continuous professional development, and learning communities in the teacher shortage (pp. 1–43). Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/164976
41.
GarcíaO.KleifgenJ. A.FalchiL. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals (pp. 1–61). A Research Initiative of the Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College.
42.
GlazermanS.IsenbergE.DolfinS.BleekerM.JohnsonA.GriderM.JacobusM. (2010). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Final results from a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2010-4027) (pp. 1–272). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
43.
GoldenbergC.ColemanR.ReeseL.Rodriguez-MojicaC. (2013). Classroom qualities for English Language Learners in language arts instruction: Technical report.
44.
GoldrickL.OstaD.BarlinD.BurnJ. (2012). Review of state policies on teacher induction (pp. 1–48). New Teacher Center.
45.
GourdK. M. (2016). What about Sam—The kid in the corner whose voice doesn’t come out?—Tensions between open discussions and inclusive educational opportunities for English learners. The CATESOL Journal, 28(1), 139–159.
46.
HaddixM. M. (2016). Cultivating racial and linguistic diversity in literacy teacher education: Teachers like me. Routledge.
47.
HeinekeA. J.GiatsouE. (2020). Learning from students, teachers, and schools: Field-based teacher education for emergent bilingual learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 71, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119877373
48.
HsiehH.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
IngersollR. M.StrongM. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233.
51.
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
52.
KrashenS. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
53.
KrathwohlD. R. (2009). Methods of educational and social science research: The logic of methods (3rd ed.). Waveland Press.
54.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163320
55.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
56.
LópezF.SantibañezL. (2018). Teacher preparation for emergent bilingual students: Implications of evidence for policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.2866
57.
LucasT.VillegasA. M. (2013). Preparing linguistically responsive teachers: Laying the foundation in preservice teacher education. Theory into Practice, 52(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.770327
58.
LucasT.VillegasA. M.Freedson-GonzalezM. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322110
59.
MenkenK.AntuñezB. (2001). An overview of the preparation and certification of teachers working with Limited English Proficient (LEP) students (pp. 1–78). National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education; ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
60.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(1), 132–141.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. The National Academies Press.
63.
OrtegaI.LuftJ. A.WongS. S. (2013). Learning to teach inquiry: A beginning science teacher of English language learners. School Science and Mathematics, 113(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2013.00174.x
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
66.
RonfeldtM.McQueenK. (2017). Does new teacher induction really improve retention?Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702583
67.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
68.
SantibañezL.GándaraP. (2018). Teachers of English language learners in secondary schools: Gaps in preparation and support (pp. 1–50). The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles
Souto-ManningM. (2019). Transforming university-based teacher education: Preparing asset-, equity-, and justice-oriented teachers within the contemporary political context. Teachers College Record, 121(6), 1–38.
72.
StarJ. R.StricklandS. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
TheoharisG.HaddixM. M. (2011). Undermining racism and a Whiteness ideology: White principals living a commitment to equitable and excellent schools. Urban Education, 46(6), 1332–1351.
75.
UmanskyI. (2018). State policies to advance English learners’ experiences and outcomes in California’s schools. Getting Down to Facts II: Stanford University and PACE.
76.
Van EsE. A.SherinM. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–595.
77.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE., Eds.). Harvard University Press.
78.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (Kindle ed.). SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
