AllegrettoS.MishelL. (2018). The teacher pay penalty has hit a new high: Trends in the teacher wage and compensation gaps through 2017. Economic Policy Institute.
2.
BlömekeS.BusseA.KaiserG.KönigJ.SuhlU. (2016). The relation between content-specific and general teacher knowledge and skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 35–46.
3.
BocalaC.BoudettK. P. (2015). Teaching educators habits of mind for using data wisely. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–20.
4.
Carter AndrewsD. J.BrownT.CastilloB. M.JacksonD.VellankiV. (2019). Beyond damage-centered teacher education: Humanizing pedagogy for teacher educators and preservice teachers. Teachers College Record, 121(6).
5.
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013). Retrieved from http://caepnet.org
6.
EpsteinJ. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Routledge.
7.
FránquizM. E. (2012). Key concepts in bilingual education: Identity texts, cultural citizenship, and humanizing pedagogy. New England Reading Association Journal, 48(1), 32–42.
8.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York,NY: Herder and Herder.
9.
GoldsteinD. (2019, December3). School reforms fail to lift U.S. on global test. The New York Times, 1.
10.
GonzálezN.MollL. C.AmantiC. (Eds.). (2006). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Routledge.
11.
GuillenL.ZeichnerK. (2018). A university-community partnership in teacher education from the perspectives of community-based teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(2), 140–153.
12.
HamiltonE. R.MargotK. C. (2019). Preservice Teachers’ Community-based field experiences. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 115.
13.
HuertaT. M. (2011). Humanizing pedagogy: Beliefs and practices on the teaching of Latino children. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(1), 38–57.
14.
KohJ. H. L.ChaiC. S. (2016). Seven design frames that teachers use when considering technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 102, 244–257.
15.
LeesA. (2016). Roles of urban indigenous community members in collaborative field-based teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(5), 363–378.
16.
LinnR. L.BakerE. L.BetebenerD. W. (2002). Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 3–16.
17.
LittleJ. W. (2011). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143–166.
18.
MandinachE.FriedmanJ. M.GummerE. (2015). How can schools of education help to build educators’ capacity to use data? A systemic view of the issue. Teachers College Record, 117(4), n4.
Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states (Vol. 1).
23.
PartelowL. (2019). What to make of declining enrollment in teacher preparation programs. Center for American Progress.
24.
RichmondG. (2017). The power of community partnership in the preparation of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 6–8.
25.
RonfeldtM. (2015). Field placement schools and instructional effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), 304–320.
26.
SalazarM. (2013). A humanizing pedagogy: Reinventing the principles and practice of education as a journey toward liberation. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 121–148.
27.
SalazarM. (2018). Interrogating teacher evaluation: Unveiling whiteness as the normative center and moving the margins. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 463–476.
28.
TutwilerS. J. W. (2005). Teachers as collaborative partners: Working with diverse families and communities. Lawrence Erlbaum.