Teacher education research is in still in the process of developing a robust set of tools that can measure the key features of coursework and fieldwork. This article focuses on the design of measures of “opportunities to learn” (OTLs) in content method courses that can be used across large populations of candidates at diverse preparation programs. We draw on the survey and interview data from a broader, longitudinal study of teacher preparation across four programs in the United States (n = 455 candidates). Variance decomposition suggests far greater within-program variation than between-program variation in reported OTL. More nuanced analyses at a single university indicate significant associations between individual characteristics and reports of OTL, suggesting that self-reports of OTL may tell us more about the candidates who complete a survey than the programs that prepare them. Discussion focuses on implications for teacher education research and next steps for studying OTL in methods coursework.
AlstonC. L.DanielsonK.DutroE.CartunA. (2017). Does a discussion by any other name sound the same? Teaching discussion in three ELA methods courses. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(3), 225-238.
2.
AnagnostopolousD.CohenJ. (April15, 2018). Challenges in conducting longitudinal research on teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
3.
BallD. L.SleepL.BoerstT. A.BassH. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458-474.
4.
BerlinR. (April15, 2018). Toward a systems approach to understanding elementary mathematics teacher preparation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
5.
BernsteinR.ChadhaA.MontjoyR. (2001). Overreporting voting: Why it happens and why it matters. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(1), 22-44.
6.
BlömekeS.KaiserG. (2012). Homogeneity or heterogeneity? Profiles of opportunities to learn in primary teacher education and their relationship to cultural context and outcomes. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 249-264. doi:10.1007/s11858-011-0378-6
7.
BlömekeS.SuhlU.KaiserG.DöhrmannM. (2012). Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: What matters in primary teacher education?Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 44-55.
8.
BoesenJ.HeleniusO.BergqvistE.BergqvistT.LithnerJ.PalmT.PalmbergB. (2014). Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 72-87.
9.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RockoffJ.WyckoffJ. (2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 793-818.
10.
BoydD. J.GrossmanP. L.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416-440.
11.
BronkhorstL. H.MeijerP. C.KosterB.VermuntJ. D. (2011). Fostering meaning-oriented learning and deliberate practice in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1120-1130.
12.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 673-682.
13.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665.
14.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R.Jr.DyeD. A., (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887-898.
15.
Darling-HammondL. (2012). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
16.
Darling-HammondL.ChungR.FrelowF. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach?Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286-302.
17.
DavisE. A.KloserM.WellsA.WindschitlM.CarlsonJ.MarinoJ.-C. (2017). Teaching the practice of leading sensemaking discussions in science: Science teacher educators using rehearsals. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 275-293.
18.
DonaldsonS. I.Grant-ValloneE. J. (2002). Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 245-260.
19.
FengL.SassT. R., (2013). What makes special-education teachers special? Teacher training and achievement of students with disabilities. Economics of Education Review, 36, 122-134.
20.
FlodenR. E. (2002). The measurement of opportunity to learn. In National Research Council (Ed.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 231-266). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
21.
GhousseiniH.BeasleyH.LordS. (2015). Investigating the potential of guided practice with an enactment tool for supporting adaptive performance. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 461-497.
22.
GhousseiniH.HerbstP. (2016). Pedagogies of practice and opportunities to learn about classroom mathematics discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(1), 79-103.
23.
GoldhaberD.KriegJ. M.TheobaldR. (2017). Does the match matter? Exploring whether student teaching experiences affect teacher effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 325-359.
24.
GonyeaR. M. (2005). Self-reported data in institutional research: Review and recommendations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2005(127), 73-89.
25.
GreeneB. A. (2015). Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: Reflections from over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14-30.
26.
GreenoJ. G.GresalfiM. S. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In MossP. A.PullinD.GeeJ. P.HaertelG.YoungL. J. (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170-199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GrissomJ. A.YoungsP. (Eds.). (2016). Improving teacher evaluation systems: Making the most of multiple measures. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
GrossmanP.HammernessK.McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-289.
29.
HenryG. T.BastianK. C.FortnerC. K.KershawD. C.PurtellK. M.ThompsonC. L.ZulliR. A. (2014). Teacher preparation policies and their effects on student achievement. Education, 9, 264-303.
30.
HoergerM.ColettaM.SörensenS.ChapmanB. P.KaukeinenK.TuX.DubersteinP. R. (2016). Personality and perceived health in spousal caregivers of patients with lung cancer: The roles of neuroticism and extraversion. Journal of Aging Research, 2016, Article 5659793.
31.
HornI. S.NolenS. B.WardC.CampbellS. S. (2008). Developing practices in multiple worlds: The role of identity in learning to teach. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 61-72.
JudgeT. A.HellerD.MountM. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530-541.
34.
KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
35.
KaneT. J.RockoffJ. E.StaigerD. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615-631.
36.
KangH.WindschitlM. (2018). How does practice-based teacher preparation influence novices’ first-year instruction?Teachers College Record, 120(8), Article 22279.
37.
KarabenickS. A.WoolleyM. E.FriedelJ. M.AmmonB. V.BlazevskiJ.BonneyC. R.. . . KellyK. L. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean?Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 139-151.
38.
KavanaghS. S.RaineyE. C. (2017). Learning to support adolescent literacy: Teacher educator pedagogy and novice teacher take up in secondary English language arts teacher preparation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 904-937.
39.
KoedelC.ParsonsE.PodgurskyM.EhlertM. (2015). Teacher preparation programs and teacher quality: Are there real differences across programs?Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 508-534.
40.
KucanL.PalincsarA. S.BusseT.HeiseyN.KlingelhoferR.RimbeyM.SchutzK. (2011). Applying the Grossman et al. theoretical framework: The case of reading. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2897-2921.
41.
KurzA.ElliottS. N.WehbyJ. H.SmithsonJ. L. (2010). Alignment of the intended, planned, and enacted curriculum in general and special education and its relation to student achievement. The Journal of Special Education, 44(3), 131-145.
42.
LampertM.FrankeM. L.KazemiE.GhousseiniH.TurrouA. C.BeasleyH.. . . CroweK. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 226-243.
43.
MayerD. P. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 29-45.
44.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In JohnO.RobinsR.PervinL. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139-153). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
45.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378-386.
46.
Monte-SanoC.BudanoC. (2013). Developing and enacting pedagogical content knowledge for teaching history: An exploration of two novice teachers’ growth over three years. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(2), 171-211.
47.
NeupertS. D.MroczekD. K.SpiroA.III. (2008). Neuroticism moderates the daily relation between stressors and memory failures. Psychology and Aging, 23(2), 287-296.
48.
NolenS. B.HornI. S.WardC. J.ChildersS. A. (2011). Novice teacher learning and motivation across contexts: Assessment tools as boundary objects. Cognition and Instruction, 29(1), 88-122.
49.
PapayJ. P.WestM. R.FullertonJ. B.KaneT. J. (2012). Does an urban teacher residency increase student achievement? Early evidence from Boston. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 413-434.
50.
PaunonenS. V., (2003). Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 411.
51.
PearmanA.StorandtM. (2005). Self-discipline and self-consciousness predict subjective memory in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(3), P153-P157.
52.
PikeG. R. (1993). The relationship between perceived learning and satisfaction with college: An alternative view. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 23-40.
53.
PikeG. R. (1999). The constant error of the halo in educational outcomes research. Research in Higher Education, 40(1), 61-86.
54.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
55.
PrestonC. (2016). University-based teacher preparation and middle grades teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 102-116.
56.
RemillardJ. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
57.
RonfeldtM. (2012). Where should student teachers learn to teach? Effects of field placement school characteristics on teacher retention and effectiveness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(1), 3-26.
58.
RonfeldtM.BrockmanS. L.CampbellS. L. (2018). Does cooperating teachers’ instructional effectiveness improve preservice teachers’ future performance?Educational Researcher, 47(7), 405-418.
59.
RonfeldtM.SchwartzN.JacobB. (2014). Does pre-service preparation matter? Examining an old question in new ways. Teachers College Record, 116(10), 1-46.
60.
RosenJ. A.PorterS. R.RogersJ. (2017). Understanding student self-reports of academic performance and course-taking behavior. AERA Open, 3(2). doi:10.1177/2332858417711427
61.
SchmidtW. H.CoganL.HouangR. (2011). The role of opportunity to learn in teacher preparation: An international context. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 138-153.
62.
SchutzK. M.GrossmanP.ShaughnessyM. (2018). Approximations of practice in teacher education. In GrossmanP. (Ed.), Teaching core practices in teacher education (pp. 57-83). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
63.
ShephardR. J. (2003). Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(3), 197-206.
64.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
65.
SmithsonJ. L.PorterA. C. (1994). Measuring classroom practice: Lessons learned from efforts to describe the enacted curriculum—The reform up close study. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED377563.pdf
66.
TakaseM.YamamotoM.SatoY.ImaiT.KawamotoM. (2017). Effects of nurses’ perceptions of actual and demanded competence on turnover intentions. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 39(10), 1330-1347.
67.
TourangeauR.RipsL. J.RasinskiK. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
WangT.TangS. (2013). Profile of opportunities to learn for TEDS-M future secondary mathematics teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 847-877.
69.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why?Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1311-1360.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
