BartoloméL. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 173-194.
2.
BrownK. D. (2013). Trouble on my mind: Toward a framework of humanizing critical sociocultural knowledge for teaching and teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16, 316-338.
3.
Carter AndrewsD. J.BrownT.CastilloB. M.Jackson-MeadowsD.VellankiV. (2019). Beyond damage-centered teacher education: Humanizing pedagogy for teacher educators and preservice teachers. Teachers College Record, 121(6), 1-28.
4.
Carter AndrewsD. J.CastilloB. (2016). Humanizing pedagogy for examinations of race and culture in teacher education. In TuittF.HaynesC.StewartS. (Eds.), Race, equity and higher education: The continued search for critical and inclusive pedagogies around the globe (pp. 112-128). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
5.
Cochran-SmithM. (2015). Teacher communities for equity. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51, 109-113.
6.
Darling-HammondL.HylerM. E.GardnerM. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
7.
Darling-HammondL.McLaughlinM. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597-604.
8.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181-199.
9.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL. M.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Analysis of a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
10.
GrayJ. A.KruseS. D.TarterC. J. (2017). Developing professional learning communities through enabling school structures, collegial trust, academic emphasis, and collective efficacy. Educational Research Applications, 2017(1), 1-8.
LomosC.HofmanR. H.BoskerR. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement—A meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 121-148.
13.
PenningtonM. C.RichardsJ. C. (2016). Teacher identity in language teaching: Integrating personal, contextual, and professional factors. RELC Journal, 47, 5-23. doi:10.1177/0033688216631219
14.
PrengerR.PoortmanC. L.HandelzaltsA. (2017). Factors influencing teachers’ professional development in networked professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 77-90.
15.
RichmondG. (2015). Making sense of the interplay of context, identity, and agency in the development of beginning secondary science teachers in high-poverty schools. In AvraamidouL. (Ed.), Studying science teacher identity: Theoretical and methodological approaches (pp. 219-236). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing.
16.
RichmondG.ManokoreV. (2011). Identifying elements critical for functional and sustainable professional learning communities. Science Education, 95, 543-570.
17.
SawchukS. (March, 2015). Steep drops seen in teacher-prep enrollment numbers. The Education Digest, 80(7), 9-12.
18.
TamA. C. F. (2015). The role of a professional learning community in teacher change: A perspective from beliefs and practices. Teachers and Teaching, 21, 22-43.
19.
van VeenK.ZwartR.MeirinkJ. (2012). What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In KooyM.van VeenK. (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 23-41). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
VoelkelR. H.Jr.ChrispeelsJ. H. (2017). Understanding the link between professional learning communities and teacher collective efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28, 505-526.
21.
WrayK. A.RichmondG. (2018). Factors shaping the agency of beginning science teachers working in high-poverty schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29, 785-803.