Achieve. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Achieve, on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS. Available from http://www.nextgenscience.org/
2.
AssafL. Z.GarzaR.BattleJ. (2010). Multicultural teacher education: Examining the perceptions, practices, and coherence in one teacher preparation program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(2), 115-135.
3.
BuchmannM.FlodenR. E. (1991). Programme coherence in teacher education: A view from the USA. Oxford Review of Education, 17(1), 65-72.
4.
CanrinusE. T.KletteK.HammernessK. (2017). Diversity in coherence: Strengths and opportunities of three programs. Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. doi:0022487117737305
5.
Carter AndrewsD. J. C.BrownT.CastilloB. M.JacksonD.VellankiV. (2019). Beyond damage-centered teacher education: Humanizing pedagogy for teacher educators and preservice teachers. Teachers College Record, 121(4), n4.
6.
CherngH. Y. S.DavisL. A. (2017). Multicultural matters: An investigation of key assumptions of multicultural education reform in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. doi:0022487117742884
7.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
8.
Darling-HammondL.HammernessK.GrossmanP.RustF.ShulmanL. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390-441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
FreireP. (2005). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare to teach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
10.
GoodwinA. L.KosnikC. (2013). Quality teacher educators = quality teachers? Conceptualizing essential domains of knowledge for those who teach teachers. Teacher Development, 17(3), 334-346.
11.
GrossmanP.HammernessK. M.McDonaldM.RonfeldtM. (2008). Constructing coherence: Structural predictors of perceptions of coherence in NYC teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 273-287.
12.
HonigM. I.HatchT. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16-30.
13.
MikeskaJ. N.AndersonC. W.SchwarzC. V. (2009). Principled reasoning about problems of practice. Science Education, 93(4), 678-686.
14.
ParkerJ. M.AndersonC. W.HeidemannM.MerrillJ.MerrittB.RichmondG.Urban-LurainM. (2012). Exploring undergraduates’ understanding of photosynthesis using diagnostic question clusters. Cbe—Life Sciences Education, 11(1), 47-57.
15.
PhilipT. M.Souto-ManningM.AndersonL.HornI. J.Carter AndrewsD.StillmanJ.VargheseM. (2018). Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as “core”: How the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. doi.org/10.1177/0022487118798324
16.
PugachM. C.Gomez-NajarroJ.MatewosA. M. (2018). A review of identity in research on social justice in teacher education: What role for intersectionality?Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. doi:0022487118760567
17.
RedishE. F. (1994). The implications for cognitive studies for teaching physics. American Journal of Physics, 62, 796-803.
18.
RichmondG.BartellT.FlodenR.PetchauerE. (2017). Core teaching practices: Addressing both social justice and academic subject matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(5), 432-434.
19.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409-427.
20.
VillegasA. M.LucasT. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of teacher education, 53(1), 20-32.