BallD.ForzaniF. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511.
2.
BartellT.FlodenR.RichmondG. (2018). What data and measures should inform teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 426-428.
3.
BellC. A.JonesN. D.LewisJ. M.QiY.LiuS.McLeodM. (2013). Understanding consequential assessment systems of teaching: Year 1 final report. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles Unified School District.
4.
BellC. A.JonesN. D.QiY.LewisJ. M. (2018). Strategies for assessing classroom teaching: Examining administrator thinking as validity evidence. Educational Assessment, 23(4), 229-249.
5.
CaughlanS.JiangH. (2014). Observation and teacher quality: Critical analysis of observational instruments in preservice teacher performance assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 375-388. doi:10.1177/0022487114541546
6.
CroftS. J.RobertsM. A.StenhouseV. L. (2015). The perfect storm of education reform: High-stakes testing and teacher evaluation. Social Justice, 42, 70-92.
Darling-HammondL. (2015). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
DonaldsonM. L.WoulfinS. (2018). From tinkering to going “rogue”: How principals use agency when enacting new teacher evaluation systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 531-556.
10.
FlynnJ. E. (2015). Racing the unconsidered: Considering whiteness, rubrics, and the function of oppression. In Tenam-ZemachM.FlynnJ. E. (Eds.), Rubric nation: Critical inquiries on the impact of rubrics in education (pp. 201-221). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
11.
ForzaniF. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357-368.
12.
GarrettR.SteinbergM. P. (2015). Examining teacher effectiveness using classroom observation scores: Evidence from the randomization of teachers to students. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(2), 224-242.
13.
GillB.ShojiM.CoenT.PlaceK. (2016). The content, predictive power, and potential bias in five widely used teacher observation instruments (REL 2017–191). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
14.
GoeL.BellC.LittleO. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521228.pdf
15.
GrossmanP.HammernessK.McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-289.
16.
HawleyW. D.IrvineJ. J. (2011, December). The teaching evaluation gap: Why students’ cultural identities hold the key. Education Week, 31, 30-31.
17.
HullJ. (2013). Trends in teacher evaluation: How states are measuring teacher performance. Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association.
18.
JonesN. D.BrownellM. T. (2014). Examining the use of classroom observations in the evaluation of special education teachers. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(2), 112-124.
LittleO.GoeL.BellC. (2009). A practical guide to evaluating teacher effectiveness. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543776.pdf
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378-386.
23.
MirraN.GarciaA.MorrellE. (2015). Doing youth participatory action research: Transforming inquiry with researchers, educators, and students. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). Teacher evaluation: A conceptual framework and examples of country practices. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/school/44568106.pdf
25.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-97.
26.
PhilipT. M.Souto-ManningM.AndersonL.HornI. J.Carter AndrewsD.StillmanJ.VargheseM. (2018). Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as “core”: How the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118798324
27.
RichmondG.BartellT.FlodenR.PetchauerE. (2017). Core teaching practices: Addressing both social justice and academic subject matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(5), 432-434.
28.
SalazarM. (2018). Interrogating teacher evaluation: Unveiling whiteness as the normative center and moving the margins. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 463-476.
29.
SalazarM.LernerJ. (2019). Teacher evaluation as culture: A framework for equitable and excellent teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
SteinbergM. P.GarrettR. (2016). Classroom composition and measured teacher performance: What do teacher observation scores really measure?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 293-317.
31.
WagnerT. (2014). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need-and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
32.
WhitehurstG.ChingosM.LindquistK. (2014). Evaluating teachers with classroom observations: Lessons learned in four districts. Washington, DC: Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings.