Teachers’ Adoption of Inquiry-Based Learning Activities: The Importance of Beliefs About Education,the Self,and the Context

Abstract

Even though studies have shown that the impact of professional development on inquiry-based learning (IBL) tends to remain limited when it fails to consider teachers’ beliefs, there is little known about how these beliefs influence teachers’ adoption of IBL. In answer to this issue, the present study offers a framework that explains teachers’ use of IBL through three constitutive dimensions of beliefs systems, covering the constructs of education, the self, and the context. This framework is empirically investigated through a survey study with 536 secondary school history teachers. The resulting data are used to estimate a structural equation model (SEM), which indicates that the framework is able to explain a relatively large portion (38%) of the variance in teachers’ decision to implement IBL. Based on the findings, the implications for professional development and research on teachers’ use of IBL in general, and within history education in particular, are discussed.

Keywords

history education inquiry-based learning teacher beliefs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akerson

V. L.

Hanuscin

D. L.

(2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653-680.

Ashton

P. T.

Webb

R. B.

(1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.

Bain

R. B.

(2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2080-2114.

Booth

(1994). Cognition in history: A British perspective. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 61-69.

Bouhon

(2009). Les représentations sociales des enseignants d’histoire relatives à leur discipline et à son engagement [History teachers’ social representations of their discipline and its teaching]. (doctoral dissertation, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). Retreived from https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal%3A30401/datastream/PDF_01/view.

Brand

B. R.

Moore

S. J.

(2011). Enhancing teachers’ application of inquiry-based strategies using a constructivist sociocultural professional development model. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 889-913.

Brunello

Checchi

(2006). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence (IZA Discussion paper No. 2348). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2009062691

Capps

D. K.

Crawford

B. A.

Constas

M. A.

(2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(3), 291-318.

Cheng

M. M. H.

W. W. M.

(2012). Analysing teacher professional development through professional dialogue: An investigation into a university-school partnership project on enquiry learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(3), 323-341.

10.

Costello

A. B.

Osborne

J. W.

(2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.

11.

Courtney

M. G. R.

(2013). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: Using the SPSS R-Menu v2.0 to make more judicious estimations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(8), 1-14.

12.

De Wever

Vandepitte

Jadoulle

J.-L

. (2011). Historical education and didactics of history in Belgium. In Erdmann

Hasberg

(Eds.), Facing, mapping, bridging diversity: Foundation of a European discourse on history education (pp. 49-50). Schwalbach, Germany: Wochenschau Verlag.

13.

Donovan

M. S.

Bransford

J. D.

(2005). How students learn: History, mathematics and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

14.

Fang

(1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65.

15.

Fehn

Koeppen

K. E.

(1998). Intensive document-based instruction in a social studies methods course and student teachers’ attitudes and practice in subsequent field experiences. Theory & Research in Social Education, 26(4), 461-484.

16.

Furtak

E. M.

Seidel

Iverson

Briggs

D. C.

(2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300-329.

17.

Gess-Newsome

Lederman

N. G.

(1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on education. In Gess-Newsome

Lederman

N. G.

(Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51-94). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

18.

Grossman

(1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

19.

Grossman

P. L.

Stodolsky

S. S.

(1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5-23.

20.

Hartzler-Miller

(2001). Making sense of “best practice” in teaching history. Theory & Research in Social Education, 29(4), 672-695.

21.

Haydn

(2011). Secondary history: Current themes. In Davies

(Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp. 30-45). Oxon, UK: Routledge.

22.

Hindriks

Verschelde

Rayp

Schoors

(2010). School tracking, social segregation and educational opportunity: Evidence from Belgium (Working paper 2010/690). Retrieved from http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_10_690.pdf

23.

Hmelo-Silver

C. E.

Duncan

R. G.

Chinn

C. A.

(2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.

24.

Hofer

B. K.

(2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383.

25.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

26.

Husbands

(2011). What do history teachers (need to) know? A framework for understanding and developing practice. In Davies

(Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp. 84-95). Oxon, UK: Routledge.

27.

Kagan

D. M.

(1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.

28.

King

Kitchener

(1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

29.

Kline

R. B.

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

30.

Korthagen

F. A. J.

(2013). In search of the essence of a good teacher. In Craig

C. J.

Meijer

Broeckmans

(Eds.), From teacher thinking to teachers and teaching: The evolution of a research community (pp. 241-274). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

31.

Korthals

(2013). Selection and tracking in secondary education: A cross country analysis of student performance and educational opportunities (Research Memorandum 12/049). Retrieved from https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/portal/files/898394/guid-2ba91b5d-2bb2-4a5b-bf61-ac6b668358ec-ASSET1.0

32.

Krumpal

(2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025-2047.

33.

Kuhn

Cheney

Weinstock

(2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309-328.

34.

Kuhn

Weinstock

Flaton

(1994). Historical reasoning as theory-evidence coordination. In Carretero

Voss

J. F.

(Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 377-401). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

35.

Lazonder

A. W.

Harmsen

(2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718.

36.

Lee

P. J.

Ashby

(2000). Progression in historical understanding among students age 7-14. In Stearns

P. N.

Seixas

Wineburg

(Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 199-222). New York: New York University Press.

37.

Lee

P. J

Shemilt

(2003). A scaffold, not a cage: Progression and progression models in history. Teaching History, 113(1), 13-24.

38.

Levy

B. L. M.

Thomas

E. E.

Drago

Rex

L. A.

(2013). Examining studies of inquiry-based Learning in three fields of education: Sparking generative conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 387-408.

39.

Lotter

Rushton

G. T.

Singer

(2013). Teacher enactment patterns: How can we help move all teachers to reform-based inquiry practice through professional development? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(8), 1263-1291.

40.

Lotter

Yow

J. A.

Peters

T. T.

(2014). Building a community of practice around inquiry instruction through a professional development program. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1-23.

41.

Loucks-Horsley

Hewson

P. W.

Love

Stiles

K. E.

Mundry

Hewson

P. W.

(1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

42.

Luft

J. A.

(2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534.

43.

Maggioni

VanSledright

Alexander

P. A.

(2009). Walking on the borders: A measure of epistemic cognition in history. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(3), 187-214.

44.

Magnusson

Krajcik

Borko

(2001). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Gess-Newsome

Lederman

N. G.

(Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implication for science education (pp. 95-132). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

45.

McCrum

(2013). History teachers’ thinking about the nature of their subject. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35(1), 73-80.

46.

McDiarmid

G. W.

(1994). Understanding history for teaching: A study of the historical understanding of prospective teachers. In Carretero

Voss

J. F.

(Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 159-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

47.

Moisan

(2010). Fondements épistémologiques et représentations sociales d’enseignants d’histoire du secondaire à l’égard de l’enseignement de l’histoire et de la formation citoyenne [Secondary school history teachers’ epistemological foundations and social representations regarding history teaching and citizenship education]. (doctoral dissertation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada). Retrieved from: https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1866/4771/Moisan_Sabrina_2010_these.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y.

48.

Monte-Sano

(2011). Learning to open up history for students: Preservice teachers’ emerging pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 260-272.

49.

Morrison

J. A.

(2014). Scientists’ participation in teacher professional development: The impact on fourth to eighth grade teachers’ understanding and implementation of inquiry science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 793-816.

50.

Muis

K. R.

Bendixen

L. D.

Haerle

F. C.

(2006). Domain-generality and Domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3-54.

51.

Nadelson

L. S.

Callahan

Pyke

Hay

Dance

Pfiester

(2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168.

52.

Nederhof

A. J.

(1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263-280.

53.

Nespor

(1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.

54.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris, France: Author.

55.

Op ‘t Eynde

De Corte

Verschaffel

. (2002). Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs: A quest for conceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization. In Leder

G. C.

Pekhonen

Törner

(Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 13-37). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

56.

Pajares

M. F.

(1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.

57.

Pajares

M. F.

(1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.

58.

Pickens

Eick

C. J.

(2009). Studying motivational strategies used by two teachers in differently tracked science courses. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 359-362.

59.

Rouet

J.-F.

Marron

M. A.

Perfetti

C. A.

Favart

(1998). Understanding historical controversies: Students’ evaluation and use of documentary evidence. In Voss

J. F.

Carretero

(Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history: International review of history education volume 2 (pp. 95-116). Abingdon, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.

60.

Schoenfeld

A. H.

(1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Beliefs systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7(4), 329-363.

61.

Seraphin

K. D.

Philippoff

Parisky

Degnan

Warren

D. P.

(2013). Teaching energy science as inquiry: Reflections on professional development as a tool to build inquiry teaching skills for middle and high school teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 235-251.

62.

Tschannen-Moran

Woofolk Hoy

A. W.

(2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.

63.

Tschannen-Moran

Woolfolk Hoy

A. W.

Hoy

W. K.

(1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.

64.

Van Driel

J. H.

Bulte

A. M. W.

Verloop

. (2007). The relationships between teachers’ general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 156-171.

65.

Van Hover

S. D.

Yeager

E. A

. (2003). Challenges facing beginning history teachers: An exploratory study. International Journal of Social Education, 19(1), 8-21.

66.

Van Nieuwenhuyse

Wils

Clarebout

Draye

Verschaffel

. (2015). Making the constructed nature of history visible. Flemish secondary history education through the lens of written exams. In Chapman

Wilschut

(Eds.), Joined-up history: New directions in history education research (pp. 231-253). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

67.

VanSledright

Limón

(2006). Learning and teaching social studies: A review of cognitive research in history and geography. In Alexander

P. A.

Winne

P. H.

(Eds.), The handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 545-570). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

68.

Voet

De Wever

(2016). History teachers’ conceptions of inquiry-based learning, beliefs about the nature of history, and their relation to the classroom context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 57-67.

69.

Voet

De Wever

(in press). Effects of immersion in inquiry-based learning on student teachers’ educational beliefs. Instructional Science.

70.

Voet

De Wever

(2017a). History teachers’ knowledge of inquiry methods: An analysis of cognitive processes used during a historical inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 312-329.

71.

Voet

De Wever

(2017b). Preparing pre-service history teachers for organizing inquiry-based learning: The effects of an introductory training program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 206-217.

72.

von Borries

. (2000). Methods and aims of teaching history in Europe. In Stearns

Seixas

Wineburg

(Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 246-261). New York: New York University Press.

73.

Voss

J. F.

Perkings

D. N.

Segal

J. W.

(1991). Informal reasoning and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

74.

Wiley

Goldman

S. R.

Graesser

A. C.

Sanchez

C. A.

Ash

I. K.

Hemmerich

J. C. A.

(2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks. American Education Research Journal, 46(4), 1060-1106.

75.

Wils

(2009). The evaporated canon and the overvalued source: History education in Belgium. In Symcox

Wilschut

(Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of history teaching (pp. 15-31). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

76.

Wilson

S. M.

Wineburg

S. S.

(1993). Wrinkles in time and place: Using performance assessments to understand the knowledge of history teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 729-769.

77.

Woofolk Hoy

A. W.

Davis

Pape

. (2006). Teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and thinking. In Alexander

P. A.

Winne

P. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 715-737). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

78.

Yilmaz

(2008). Social studies teachers’ conceptions of history: Calling on historiography. Journal of Educational Research, 101(3), 158-176.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.12 MB