Even though studies have shown that the impact of professional development on inquiry-based learning (IBL) tends to remain limited when it fails to consider teachers’ beliefs, there is little known about how these beliefs influence teachers’ adoption of IBL. In answer to this issue, the present study offers a framework that explains teachers’ use of IBL through three constitutive dimensions of beliefs systems, covering the constructs of education, the self, and the context. This framework is empirically investigated through a survey study with 536 secondary school history teachers. The resulting data are used to estimate a structural equation model (SEM), which indicates that the framework is able to explain a relatively large portion (38%) of the variance in teachers’ decision to implement IBL. Based on the findings, the implications for professional development and research on teachers’ use of IBL in general, and within history education in particular, are discussed.
AkersonV. L.HanuscinD. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653-680.
2.
AshtonP. T.WebbR. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.
3.
BainR. B. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2080-2114.
4.
BoothM. (1994). Cognition in history: A British perspective. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 61-69.
5.
BouhonM. (2009). Les représentations sociales des enseignants d’histoire relatives à leur discipline et à son engagement [History teachers’ social representations of their discipline and its teaching]. (doctoral dissertation, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). Retreived from https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal%3A30401/datastream/PDF_01/view.
6.
BrandB. R.MooreS. J. (2011). Enhancing teachers’ application of inquiry-based strategies using a constructivist sociocultural professional development model. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 889-913.
7.
BrunelloG.ChecchiD. (2006). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence (IZA Discussion paper No. 2348). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2009062691
8.
CappsD. K.CrawfordB. A.ConstasM. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(3), 291-318.
9.
ChengM. M. H.SoW. W. M. (2012). Analysing teacher professional development through professional dialogue: An investigation into a university-school partnership project on enquiry learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(3), 323-341.
10.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
11.
CourtneyM. G. R. (2013). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: Using the SPSS R-Menu v2.0 to make more judicious estimations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(8), 1-14.
12.
De WeverB.VandepitteP.JadoulleJ.-L. (2011). Historical education and didactics of history in Belgium. In ErdmannE.HasbergW. (Eds.), Facing, mapping, bridging diversity: Foundation of a European discourse on history education (pp. 49-50). Schwalbach, Germany: Wochenschau Verlag.
13.
DonovanM. S.BransfordJ. D. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
14.
FangZ. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65.
15.
FehnB.KoeppenK. E. (1998). Intensive document-based instruction in a social studies methods course and student teachers’ attitudes and practice in subsequent field experiences. Theory & Research in Social Education, 26(4), 461-484.
16.
FurtakE. M.SeidelT.IversonH.BriggsD. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300-329.
17.
Gess-NewsomeJ.LedermanN. G. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on education. In Gess-NewsomeJ.LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51-94). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18.
GrossmanP. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19.
GrossmanP. L.StodolskyS. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5-23.
20.
Hartzler-MillerC. (2001). Making sense of “best practice” in teaching history. Theory & Research in Social Education, 29(4), 672-695.
21.
HaydnT. (2011). Secondary history: Current themes. In DaviesI. (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp. 30-45). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
22.
HindriksJ.VerscheldeM.RaypG.SchoorsK. (2010). School tracking, social segregation and educational opportunity: Evidence from Belgium (Working paper 2010/690). Retrieved from http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_10_690.pdf
23.
Hmelo-SilverC. E.DuncanR. G.ChinnC. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
24.
HoferB. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383.
25.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
26.
HusbandsC. (2011). What do history teachers (need to) know? A framework for understanding and developing practice. In DaviesI. (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp. 84-95). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
27.
KaganD. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
28.
KingP.KitchenerK. (1994). Developing reflective judgment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
KorthagenF. A. J. (2013). In search of the essence of a good teacher. In CraigC. J.MeijerP.BroeckmansJ. (Eds.), From teacher thinking to teachers and teaching: The evolution of a research community (pp. 241-274). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
KrumpalI. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025-2047.
33.
KuhnD.CheneyR.WeinstockM. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309-328.
34.
KuhnD.WeinstockM.FlatonR. (1994). Historical reasoning as theory-evidence coordination. In CarreteroM.VossJ. F. (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 377-401). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
LazonderA. W.HarmsenR. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718.
36.
LeeP. J.AshbyR. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students age 7-14. In StearnsP. N.SeixasP.WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 199-222). New York: New York University Press.
37.
LeeP. JShemiltD. (2003). A scaffold, not a cage: Progression and progression models in history. Teaching History, 113(1), 13-24.
38.
LevyB. L. M.ThomasE. E.DragoK.RexL. A. (2013). Examining studies of inquiry-based Learning in three fields of education: Sparking generative conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 387-408.
39.
LotterC.RushtonG. T.SingerJ. (2013). Teacher enactment patterns: How can we help move all teachers to reform-based inquiry practice through professional development?Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(8), 1263-1291.
40.
LotterC.YowJ. A.PetersT. T. (2014). Building a community of practice around inquiry instruction through a professional development program. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1-23.
41.
Loucks-HorsleyS.HewsonP. W.LoveN.StilesK. E.MundryS.HewsonP. W. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
42.
LuftJ. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534.
43.
MaggioniL.VanSledrightB.AlexanderP. A. (2009). Walking on the borders: A measure of epistemic cognition in history. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(3), 187-214.
44.
MagnussonS.KrajcikJ.BorkoH. (2001). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Gess-NewsomeJ.LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implication for science education (pp. 95-132). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45.
McCrumE. (2013). History teachers’ thinking about the nature of their subject. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35(1), 73-80.
46.
McDiarmidG. W. (1994). Understanding history for teaching: A study of the historical understanding of prospective teachers. In CarreteroM.VossJ. F. (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 159-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
MoisanS. (2010). Fondements épistémologiques et représentations sociales d’enseignants d’histoire du secondaire à l’égard de l’enseignement de l’histoire et de la formation citoyenne [Secondary school history teachers’ epistemological foundations and social representations regarding history teaching and citizenship education]. (doctoral dissertation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada). Retrieved from: https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1866/4771/Moisan_Sabrina_2010_these.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y.
48.
Monte-SanoC. (2011). Learning to open up history for students: Preservice teachers’ emerging pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 260-272.
49.
MorrisonJ. A. (2014). Scientists’ participation in teacher professional development: The impact on fourth to eighth grade teachers’ understanding and implementation of inquiry science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 793-816.
50.
MuisK. R.BendixenL. D.HaerleF. C. (2006). Domain-generality and Domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3-54.
51.
NadelsonL. S.CallahanJ.PykeP.HayA.DanceM.PfiesterJ. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168.
52.
NederhofA. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263-280.
53.
NesporJ. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.
54.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris, France: Author.
55.
Op ‘t EyndeP.De CorteE.VerschaffelL. (2002). Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs: A quest for conceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization. In LederG. C.PekhonenE.TörnerG. (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 13-37). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
56.
PajaresM. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
57.
PajaresM. F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.
58.
PickensM.EickC. J. (2009). Studying motivational strategies used by two teachers in differently tracked science courses. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 359-362.
59.
RouetJ.-F.MarronM. A.PerfettiC. A.FavartM. (1998). Understanding historical controversies: Students’ evaluation and use of documentary evidence. In VossJ. F.CarreteroM. (Eds.), Learning and reasoning in history: International review of history education volume 2 (pp. 95-116). Abingdon, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
60.
SchoenfeldA. H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Beliefs systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7(4), 329-363.
61.
SeraphinK. D.PhilippoffJ.PariskyA.DegnanK.WarrenD. P. (2013). Teaching energy science as inquiry: Reflections on professional development as a tool to build inquiry teaching skills for middle and high school teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 235-251.
62.
Tschannen-MoranM.Woofolk HoyA. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
63.
Tschannen-MoranM.Woolfolk HoyA. W.HoyW. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
64.
Van DrielJ. H.BulteA. M. W.VerloopN. (2007). The relationships between teachers’ general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 156-171.
65.
Van HoverS. D.YeagerE. A. (2003). Challenges facing beginning history teachers: An exploratory study. International Journal of Social Education, 19(1), 8-21.
66.
Van NieuwenhuyseK.WilsK.ClareboutG.DrayeG.VerschaffelL. (2015). Making the constructed nature of history visible. Flemish secondary history education through the lens of written exams. In ChapmanA.WilschutA. (Eds.), Joined-up history: New directions in history education research (pp. 231-253). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
67.
VanSledrightB.LimónM. (2006). Learning and teaching social studies: A review of cognitive research in history and geography. In AlexanderP. A.WinneP. H. (Eds.), The handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 545-570). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68.
VoetM.De WeverB. (2016). History teachers’ conceptions of inquiry-based learning, beliefs about the nature of history, and their relation to the classroom context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 57-67.
69.
VoetM.De WeverB. (in press). Effects of immersion in inquiry-based learning on student teachers’ educational beliefs. Instructional Science.
70.
VoetM.De WeverB. (2017a). History teachers’ knowledge of inquiry methods: An analysis of cognitive processes used during a historical inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 312-329.
71.
VoetM.De WeverB. (2017b). Preparing pre-service history teachers for organizing inquiry-based learning: The effects of an introductory training program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 206-217.
72.
von BorriesB. (2000). Methods and aims of teaching history in Europe. In StearnsP.SeixasP.WineburgS. (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 246-261). New York: New York University Press.
73.
VossJ. F.PerkingsD. N.SegalJ. W. (1991). Informal reasoning and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
WileyJ.GoldmanS. R.GraesserA. C.SanchezC. A.AshI. K.HemmerichJ. C. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks. American Education Research Journal, 46(4), 1060-1106.
75.
WilsK. (2009). The evaporated canon and the overvalued source: History education in Belgium. In SymcoxR.WilschutA. (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of history teaching (pp. 15-31). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
76.
WilsonS. M.WineburgS. S. (1993). Wrinkles in time and place: Using performance assessments to understand the knowledge of history teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 729-769.
77.
Woofolk HoyA. W.DavisH.PapeS. (2006). Teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and thinking. In AlexanderP. A.WinneP. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 715-737). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78.
YilmazK. (2008). Social studies teachers’ conceptions of history: Calling on historiography. Journal of Educational Research, 101(3), 158-176.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
