In collaborative groups, teachers negotiate the tension between working as a cohesive group and confronting differences of opinion and practice. Varied status between teachers can complicate their ability to accomplish the goals of collaboration. In this case study, we describe how a group of secondary English teachers redesigned curriculum and explain how status shaped their collaborative practice. We use positioning theory to examine how teachers managed variable status to maintain a collaborative group process. Findings suggest the high-status teacher shaped inclusive collaborative routines that afforded novice teachers the space to initiate discussions focused on problems of practice.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295-298.
2.
BallD. L.CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.) Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
3.
BaolerJ. O.StaplesM. (2008). Creating Mathematical Futures through an Equitable Teaching Approach: The Case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110(3).
4.
BarronB.Darling-HammondL. (2008). How can we teaching for meaningful learning? In CervettiJ. L. T. G. N.Darling-HammondL.BarronD.PearsonB.SchoenfeldA. H.StageE. K.ZimmermanT. D. (Ed.), Powerful Learning: What We Know About Teaching for Understanding. (pp. 11-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BellandB. R.GlazewskiK. D.ErtmerP. A. (2009). Inclusion and Problem-Based Learning: Roles of Students in a Mixed-Ability Group. RMLE Online: Research in Middle Level Education, 32(9), 1-19.
6.
BergerJ.RosenholtzS. J.ZelditchM.Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479-508.
7.
BlumenfeldP. C.SolowayE.MarxR. W. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
8.
BorkoH. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
9.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. (1999). Chapter 8: Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
10.
CohenE. G. (1997). Understanding status problems: Sources and consequences. In CohenE.LotanR. (Eds.), Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice (pp. 62-65). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
12.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
13.
DempseyN. P. (2010). Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 349-367.
14.
DuFourR. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”?Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
15.
DuFourR.ReevesD. (2016). The futility of PLC lite. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(6), 69-73.
16.
EllisL. (1994). Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality: Vol. 2: Reproductive and interpersonal aspects of dominance and status. Westport, CT: Praeger.
17.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods in research, pp. 145-161. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd edition. New York: MacMillan.
18.
FlynnF. J.ReagansR. E.AmanatullahE. T.AmesD. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status be helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1123-1137.
19.
GallucciC.Van LareM. D.YoonI. H.BoatrightB. (2010). Instructional coaching: Building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 919-963.
20.
GrossmanP.WineburgS.WoolworthS. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
21.
HammernessK.Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ.BerlinerD.Cochran-SmithM.McDonaldM.ZeichnerK. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Education.
22.
HargreavesA.FullanM. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
23.
HargreavesA.MacmillanR. (1995). The balkanization of secondary school teaching. In. SiskinL.LittleJ. (Eds.). The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school. (pp. 141-171). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
HindinA.MoroccoC.MottE.AguilarC. (2007). More than just a group: Teacher collaboration and learning in the workplace. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13, 349-376.
26.
HornI.LittleJ. (2009). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 181-217.
27.
IngersolR. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
KilbaneJ. (2009). Factors in sustaining professional learning community. NAASP Bulletin, 93(3), 184-205.
29.
LampertM.BoerstT.GrazianiF. (2011). Organizational resources in the service of school-wide ambitious teaching practice. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1361-1400.
LeanderK. M.OsborneM. D. (2008). Complex positioning: Teachers as agents of curricular and pedagogical reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 23-46.
32.
LittleJ. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions for school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325-340.
33.
LittleJ. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
34.
LittleJ. W. (2002). Professional community and the problem of high school reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 693-714.
35.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
36.
LotanR., A. (2003). Group-worthy tasks. Educational Leadership, (60)6, 72-75.
37.
McLaughlinM. W.TalbertJ. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
OpferD. V.PedderD. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407.
40.
ParkerW. C.LoJ.YeoA. J.ValenciaS. W.NguyenD.AbbottR. D.. . . VyeN. J. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: Toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1424-1459.
41.
PattonM. Q. (2003). Qualitative interviewing. In PattonM. Q. (Ed.), Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed., pp. 339-384). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
PowellA. B.FranciscoJ. M.MaherC. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405-435.
43.
RavitzJ. (2009). Introduction: Summary findings and looking ahead to a new generation of PBL research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 4-11.
44.
SalomonG. (1993). No distribution without individual cognition: A distributed interactionist view. In SalomonG. (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111-138). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45.
SchepensA.AeltermanA.Van KeerH. (2007). Studying the processes of student teachers with stimulated recall interviews through changes in interactive cognitions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 457-472.
46.
SchiffrinD. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
SpillaneJ. P.HalvorsenR.DiamondJ. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.
48.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
49.
TimperleyH. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420.
50.
Van MaanenJ.BarleyS. R. (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Research in Occupational Behavior, 6, 287-365.
51.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (pp. 79-104). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WilsonS. M.BerneJ. (1999). Chapter 6: Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173-209.
54.
WineburgS. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73-87.
55.
YinR. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
56.
York-BarrJ.DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 155-316.
57.
ZeichnerK. (2016). Independent teacher education programs: Apocryphal claims, illusionary evidence. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/teacher-education
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
