Despite the heated debates about dispositions in teacher education, most accrediting agencies continue to put dispositions among their priorities. The authors of the current article concur with the value of using Dewey to understand how habits can be clustered to better understand intelligent teaching dispositions. But, can we extend Dewey’s epistemology to learning theories in a manner that informs the making of teaching conduct more intelligent? To address this question, the authors applied qualitative content analysis to review the literature. Through a deductive approach, dispositions as Habits of Mind were related to educational theories using intelligent behaviors as the common denominator. The conclusion is that dispositions can be clustered around Habits of Mind that are related directly to educational learning theories vis-à-vis thoughtfulness, and to learning theories that support learning or mindfulness. Grounding dispositions as habits of mind in selected educational theories may guide and support the professional development of teaching dispositions.
BanduraA. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
BanduraM.DweckC. S. (1985). The relationship of conceptions of intelligence and achievement goals to achievement-related cognition, affect, and behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
3.
BercawL.SummersD.ColbyS.PayneM. (2012). Mirror images: Teacher candidates’ perceptions of disposition development. Action in Teacher Education, 34(5/6), 514-525.
4.
BodnerG. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878.
5.
BorkoH.ListonD.WhitcombJ. (2007). Genres of empirical research in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 3-11.
6.
BroderickP. C.FrankJ. L. (2014). Learning to BREATHE: An intervention to foster mindfulness in adolescence. New Directions in Youth Development, 142, 31-44.
7.
BroderickP. C.MetzS. (2009). Learning to BREATHE: A pilot trial of a mindfulness curriculum for adolescents. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 2, 35-46.
8.
BurantT. J.ChubbuckS. M.WhippJ. L. (2007). Reclaiming the moral in the dispositions debate. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 397-411.
ClaxtonG.CarrM. (2004). A framework for teaching learning: The dynamics of disposition. Early Years, 24(1), 87-97.
12.
CoppenM. (2002). New directions for tomorrow’s schools: A personal view from New Zealand. PEB Exchange, 2(46), 22-24.
13.
CostaA. L. (1991). The search for intelligent life. In CostaA. (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 100-106). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14.
CostaA. L. (2001). Habits of mind. In CostaA. (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 80-86). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
15.
CostaA. L.KallickB. (2000). Habits of mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16.
CostaA. L.KallickB. (Eds.). (2008). Learning and leading with habits of mind: 16 essential characteristics for success. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2013). CAEP standards for accreditation of educator preparation. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/standards/introduction
19.
Da Ros-VoselesD.Fowler-HaugheyS. (2007). Why children’s dispositions should matter to all teachers. Beyond the Journal: Young Children on the Web, 1(3), 1-7.
20.
DeweyJ. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
21.
DeweyJ. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery.
22.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier.
23.
DiezM. E. (2006). Assessing dispositions: Five principles to guide practice. In SockettH. (Ed.), Teacher dispositions: Building a teacher education framework of moral standards (pp. 49-68). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
24.
DiezM. E. (2007). Looking back and moving forward: Three tensions in the teacher dispositions discourse. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 388-396.
25.
DottinE. (2009). Professional judgment and dispositions in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 83-88.
26.
DottinE. S. (2010). Dispositions as habits of mind: Making professional conduct more intelligent. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
27.
DottinE. S.SockettH. (2006). A Deweyan approach to the development of moral dispositions in professional teacher education communities. In SockettH. (Ed.), Teacher dispositions: Building a teacher education framework of moral standards (pp. 27-47). New York, NY: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
28.
DweckC. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
29.
DweckC. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philedelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
30.
DweckC. S. (2016). The remarkable reach of growth mind-sets. Scientific American Mind, 27(1), 36-41.
31.
EnnisR. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and assessability. Informal Logic, 18(2&3), 165-182.
32.
FacioneP. A.SanchezC. A.FacioneN. C.GainenJ. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1-25.
33.
FerroR. T. (1993). The influence of affective processing in education and training. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 59, 25-33.
34.
FlorezR. I. (2011). Developing young children’s self-regulation through everyday experiences. Young Children, 46-51.
35.
FreemanL. (2007). An overview of dispositions in teacher education. In DiezM. E.RathsJ. (Eds.), Dispositions in teacher education (pp. 3-29). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
36.
GolemanD. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
37.
HaimovitzK.WormingtonS. V.CorpusJ. H. (2011). Dangerous mindsets: How beliefs about intelligence predict motivational change. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 747-752.
38.
HawkeyK. (2006). Emotional intelligence and mentoring in pre-service teacher education: A literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring, 14(2), 137-147.
39.
HoytM. (2016). Teaching with mindfulness: The pedagogy of being-with/for and without being-with/for. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 31(1), 126-142.
40.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
41.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing, assessment and development: A resource for state dialogue. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/corestrd.pdf
42.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (2013). Model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
43.
JenningsP. A.GreenbergM. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to child and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491-525.
44.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 10(2), 144-156.
KatzL. G.RathsJ. D. (1985). A framework for research on teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(6), 9-15.
47.
LangerE. J. (2000). Mindful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 220-223.
48.
MarzanoR. J. (1992). A different kind of learning: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
49.
MayerJ. D.CarusoD. R.SaloveyP. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27(4), 267-298.
50.
MayerJ. D.SaloveyP.CarusoD. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 60, 197-215.
51.
MayringP. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundations, basic procedures and software solution. Social Science Open Access Repository. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
52.
MeiklejohnJ.PhillipsC.FreedmanM. L.GriffinM. L.BiegelG.RoachA.. . . SaltzmanA. (2012). Integrating mindfulness training into K-12 education: Fostering resilience of teachers and students. Mindfulness, 3, 291-307.
53.
MullinD. (2003, January). Developing a framework for the assessment of teacher candidate dispositions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA.
NaylorS.KeoghB. (1999). Constructivism in classroom: Theory into practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 93-106.
56.
NelsenP. J. (2015). Intelligent dispositions: Dewey, habits and inquiry in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 86-97.
57.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
58.
PaulR. W. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park, CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University.
59.
Perez-AlvarezF.Timoneda-GallartC. (2007). A better look at intelligent behavior: Cognition and emotion. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
60.
PerkinsD.JayE.TishmanS. (1993). Teaching thinking: From ontology to education. Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 67-85.
61.
PowellK. C.KalinaC. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250.
62.
RattanA.GoodC.DweckC. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731-737.
63.
RitchhartR. (2001). From IQ to IC: A dispositional view of intelligence. Roeper Review, 23(3), 143-150.
64.
RitchhartR. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters, and how to get it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
65.
RoeserR. W.SkinnerE. A.BeersJ.JenningsP. A. (2012). Mindfulness training and teachers’ professional development: An emerging area of research and practice. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 146-153.
66.
RuitenbergW. C. (2011). The trouble with dispositions: A critical examination of personal beliefs, professional commitments and actual conduct in teacher education. Ethics and Education, 6(1), 41-52.
67.
SchrawG.CrippenK.HartleyK. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
68.
SchunkD. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
69.
SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
70.
SerdyukovP.FergusonB. T. (2011). Teacher dispositions: What kind of candidates do we have in a teacher education program and how do we make them better?Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 4(1), 106-119.
71.
ThorntonH. (2006). Dispositions in action: Do dispositions make a difference in practice?Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(2), 53-68.
72.
ÜltanırE. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195-212.
73.
YeagerD. S.DweckS. C. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302-314.
74.
ZimmermanB. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.
75.
ZimmermanB. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76.
ZimmermanB. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64-72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
