Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-5
Preparing Mainstream Classroom Teachers of English Learner Students: Grounding Practice-Based Designs for Teacher Learning in Theories of Adaptive Expertise Development
Preparing classroom teachers to teach English Learner (EL) students continues to challenge teacher educators. This article argues for EL teaching work to be situated within theories of professional learning that focus on developing teachers who can flexibly and innovatively integrate EL instructional practice into content area teaching. We propose a framework of adaptive expertise that highlights scaffolding instructional practice while simultaneously creating opportunities for preservice teachers to collectively engage with problems of practice and critical reflection in real time in classrooms. Using data from a qualitative study involving a practice-based design—the studio day—in teacher education, we illustrate key elements of the framework. We examine the potential of studio days to help preservice teachers build integrated knowledge about rigorous mathematics and language instruction. Framing the preparation of classroom teachers to teach EL students within theories of adaptive expertise may inform teacher education pedagogies and contexts for teacher learning.
AnthonyG.HunterJ.HunterR. (2015). Prospective teachers’ development of adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 108-117.
2.
AthanasesS. Z.de OliveiraL. C. (2011). Toward program-wide coherence in preparing teachers to teach and advocate for English language learners. In LucasT. (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms (pp. 195-215). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AthanasesS. Z.WahleithnerJ. M.BennettL. H. (2012). Learning to attend to culturally and linguistically diverse learners through teacher inquiry in teacher education. Teachers College Record, 114(7), 1-50.
4.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R., National Research Council (U.S.), Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, & Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. (2007). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
5.
BransfordJ. D.DerryS.BerlinerD.HammernessK. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 40-87). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BransfordJ. D.SchwartzD. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.
7.
BrophyS.HodgeL.BransfordJ. (2004, October). Work in progress—Adaptive expertise: Beyond apply academic knowledge. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA.
8.
BunchG. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37, 298-341.
9.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (1999). Chapter 8: Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-304.
10.
de JongE. J.HarperC. A. (2011). “Accommodating diversity”: Pre-service teachers’ views on effective practices for English language learners. In LucasT. (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms (pp. 73-190). New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
de JongE. J.HarperC. A.CoadyM. R. (2013). Enhanced knowledge and skills for elementary mainstream teachers of English language learners. Theory Into Practice, 52, 89-97.
12.
EchevarriaJ.VogtM.ShortD. (2013). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
13.
EnrightK. A. (2011). Language and literacy for a new mainstream. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 80-118.
14.
Feiman-NemserS. (1989). Changing beginning teachers’ conceptions: A description of an introductory teacher education course (Research Report 89-1). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED).
15.
GebhardM. (2010). Teacher education in changing times: A Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 797-803.
16.
GlasswellK.RyanJ. (2017). Reflective practice in teacher professional standards: Reflection as mandatory practice. In BrandenburgR.GlasswellK.JonesM.RyanJ. (Eds.), Reflective theory and practice in teacher education (pp. 3-26). Singapore: Springer.
17.
GrossmanP.HammernessK.McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teacher: Re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-290.
18.
HatanoG.InagakiK. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In StevensonH.AzumaH.HakutaK. (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
19.
HatanoG.OuraY. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26-29.
20.
HatanoG.WertschJ. V. (2001). Sociocultural approaches to cognitive development: The constitutions of culture in mind. Human Development, 44(2-3), 77-83.
21.
JanzenJ. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010-1038.
22.
JohnsonK. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235-257.
23.
KennedyM. (2016). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 6-17.
24.
LampertM. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21-34.
25.
LampertM.FrankeM.KazemiE.GhousseiniH.TurrouA. C.BeasleyH.. . . CroweK. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support pre-service teacher learning of ambitious teaching in elementary mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 226-243.
26.
LewisC. L.PerryR.MurataA. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.
27.
LucasT. (Ed.). (2011). Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource book for teacher educators. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
LucasT.VillegasA. M. (2011). A framework for preparing linguistically responsive teachers. In LucasT. (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 55-72). New York, NY: Routledge.
PeercyM. M.TroyanF. J. (2017). Making transparent the challenges of developing a practice-based pedagogy of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 26-36.
31.
RussellT.MartinA. K. (2017). Reflective practice: Epistemological perspectives on learning from experience in teacher education. In BrandenburgR.GlasswellK.JonesM.RyanJ. (Eds.), Reflective theory and practice in teacher education (pp. 27-47). Singapore: Springer.
32.
SchleppegrellM. J. (2010). Language in mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. In MoschkovichJ. N. (Ed.), Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research (pp. 73-112). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
33.
SchwartzD. L.BransfordJ. D.SearsD. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In MestreJ. P. (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1-51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
34.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM. M.TodorovaI. (2008). Learning a new land: Immigrant students in American society. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
35.
TimperleyH. (2013, March). Learning to practise: A paper for discussion. Paper prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Education, Wellington.
36.
TimperleyH.WilsonA.BarrarH.FungI. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
37.
WalquiA. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
