This three phase longitudinal multiple-case study, framed by positioning theory, investigated how four novice teachers learned to use professional judgment in their literacy instruction. Data sources from coursework, student teaching, and novice teaching were included. Interviews, observations, researchers’ observational notes, and school and classroom demographics were compiled and analyzed to create case reports. Findings indicated while they differed in their use of professional judgment as novice teachers, participants learned this skill in student teaching rather than in coursework, which caused us to question whether teacher preparation programs are preparing teachers to use professional judgment or training them for technical compliance.
AndersonD. (2009). The impact of cooperating teachers on the teaching perspectives of student teachers. The International Journal of Learning, 16(1), 119-133.
2.
BousheyG.MoserJ. (2006). The daily 5. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
3.
BrownleeJ.SchrawG.BerthelsenD. (2011). Personal epistemology and teacher education. In BrownleeJ.SchrawG.BerthelsenD. (Eds.), Personal epistemology and teacher education (pp. 4-39). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
ClarkS.JonesC. D.ReutzelD. R.AndreasenL. (2013). An examination of the influences of a teacher preparation program on beginning teachers’ reading instruction. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52(2), 87-105.
5.
CliftR. T.BradyP. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In Cochran-SmithM.ZeichnerK. M. (Eds.), Studying teacher education (pp. 309-424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
DuffyG. G. (2005). Developing metacognitive teachers: Visioning and the expert’s changing role in teacher education and professional development. In IsraelS. E.BlockC. C.BausermanK. L.Kinnucan-WelschK. (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning (pp. 299-314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
DuffyG. G.RoehlerL. (1987). Improving reading instruction through the use of responsive elaboration. The Reading Teacher, 40(6), 514-521.
8.
ElbazF. (1981). The teacher’s “practical knowledge”: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 43-71.
9.
FivesH.BuehlM. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the messy construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In HarrisK. R.GrahamS.UrdanT. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 471-499). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
10.
HarréR. (2011). Foreword. In McVeeM. B.BrockC. H.GlazierJ. A. (Eds.), Sociocultural positioning in literacy (pp. ix-xi). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
11.
HarréR.MoghaddamF. M. (2003). Introduction. In HarréR.MoghaddamF. M. (Eds.), The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts (pp. 1-11). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
12.
HarréR.van LangenhoveL. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
13.
HenkW. A.MooreJ. C.MarinakB. A.TomasettiB. W. (2000). A reading lesson observation framework for elementary teachers, principals, and literacy supervisors. The Reading Teacher, 53(5), 358-369.
14.
HenningJ. E.KohlerF. W. (2007). Preparing preservice teachers to make instructional decisions through coursework, observational field experiences, and teaching experiences. Teacher Education and Practice, 20(4), 409-425.
15.
International Reading Association. (2010). Standards for reading professionals. Newark, DE: Author.
16.
KeeneE. O.ZimmermannS. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader’s workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17.
KohlerF.HenningJ. E.Usma-WilchesJ. (2008). Preparing preservice teachers to make instructional decisions: An examination of data from the teacher work sample. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2108-2117.
18.
KuhnD.WeinstockM. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In HoferB.PintrichP. (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychological beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 123-146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
LevinB. B. (2015). The development of teachers’ beliefs. In FivesH.GillM. G. (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 48-65). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
LynchP. (2013). After pedagogy: The experience of teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
21.
McCallumR. (Producer), & LucasG.(Director). (2002). Star wars: Episode II—Attack of the clones [Motion picture]. USA: Lucasfilm.
22.
McVeeM. B. (2011). Positioning theory and sociocultural perspectives: Affordances for educational researchers. In McVeeM. B.BrockC. H.GlazierJ. A. (Eds.), Sociocultural positioning in literacy: Exploring culture, discourse, narrative, & power in diverse educational contexts (pp. 1-21). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
23.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
O’BrienT. (2010). Brain-powered science: Teaching and learning with discrepant events. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
25.
ParsonsS. A. (2012). Adaptive teaching in literacy instruction: Case studies of two teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(2), 149-170.
26.
ParsonsS. A.DavisS. G.ScalesR. Q.WilliamsB.KearK. A. (2010). How and why teachers adapt their literacy instruction. In SzaboS.SampsonM. B.FooteM.Falk-RossF. (Eds.), Mentoring literacy professionals: Continuing the spirit of CRA/ALER after 50 years: The thirty-first yearbook: A double peer-reviewed publication of the college reading association (Vol. 31, pp. 221-236). Commerce, TX: Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.
27.
ParsonsS. A.DodmanS. L.BurrowbridgeS. C. (2013). Broadening the view of differentiated instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(1), 38-42.
28.
PressleyM.Wharton-McDonaldR.HampstonJ. M. (2006). Expert primary-level teaching of literacy is balanced teaching. In PressleyM. (Ed.), Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed., pp. 240-292). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
RomanoM. E. (2006). “Bumpy moments” in teaching: Reflections from practicing teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 973-985.
30.
RozelleJ. J.WilsonS. M. (2012). Opening the black box of field experiences: How cooperating teachers’ beliefs and practices shape student teachers’ beliefs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1196-1205.
31.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
32.
ScalesR. Q.GanskeK.GrishamD. L.YoderK. K.LenskiS.WolseyT. D.. . .SmetanaL. (2014). Exploring the impact of literacy teacher education programs on student teachers’ instructional practices. Journal of Reading Education, 39(3), 3-13.
33.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
34.
SchwartzB.SharpeK. (2010). Practical wisdom: The right way to do the right thing. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
35.
SkottJ. (2013). Understanding the role of the teacher in emerging classroom practice: Searching for patterns of participation. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 547-559.
36.
SkottJ. (2015). The promises, problems, and prospects of research on teachers’ beliefs. In FivesH.GillM. G. (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 13-30). New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
WorthamS. (2003). Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 229-247.
38.
ZembylasM.ChubbuckS. M. (2015). The intersection of identity, beliefs, and politics in conceptualizing “teacher identity.” In FivesH.GillM. G. (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 173-190). New York, NY: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
