Given widespread acceptance of the role of teaching in improving student outcomes, it is not surprising that policy makers have turned to teaching standards as a lever for educational improvement. There are, however, long-standing critiques of standards that suggest they are reductionist and promote a dualism between theory and practice. Our purpose here is to propose a model of Teaching for Better Learning (TBL) that responds to those critiques and that captures the complexity of teaching rather than focusing on discrete elements. Our model foregrounds the salience of teachers’ own situations and the active nature of teachers’ practice in a way that integrates practice with relevant theory. We outline how the TBL model can be used to derive inquiry-oriented teaching standards, an alternative approach that challenges widely accepted conventions for the design of standards and, we argue, might better support the improvement of teaching and learning.
AitkenG.SinnemaC. (2008). Effective pedagogy in social sciences / Tikanga a iwi: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
2.
ArgyrisC.SchönD. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Carlton South: Education Services Australia.
5.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554
6.
BarberM. (1992). An entitlement curriculum: A strategy for the nineties. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(5), 449-455. doi:10.1080/0022027920240502
7.
BaumertJ.KunterM.BlumW.BrunnerM.VossT.JordanA.. . .TsaiY.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157
8.
BeckJ. (2009). Appropriating professionalism: Restructuring the official knowledge base of England’s “modernised” teaching profession. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 3-14. doi:10.1080/01425690802514268
9.
BeckJ.YoungM. (2005). The assault on the professions and the restructuring of academic and professional identities: A Bernsteinian analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 183-197. doi:10.1080/0142569042000294165
10.
BengtssonJ. (1995). Theory and practice —Two fundamental categories in the philosophy of teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 18(2-3), 231-238. doi:10.1080/0261976950180208
11.
BishopR.BerrymanM. (2006). Culture speaks: Cultural relationships and classroom learning. Wellington, New Zealand: Huia Publishers.
12.
BrownG. (2008). Assessment literacy training and teachers’ conceptions of assessment. In Rubie-DaviesC. M.RawlinsonC. (Eds.), Challenging thinking about teaching and learning (pp. 269-285). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
13.
Cochran-SmithM. (2001). Constructing outcomes in teacher education: Policy, practice and pitfalls. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(11). doi:10.14507/epaa.v9n11.2001
14.
Cochran-SmithM. (2003). The unforgiving complexity of teaching: Avoiding simplicity in the age of accountability. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 3-5. doi:10.1177/0022487102238653
15.
Cochran-SmithM.EllF.LudlowL.GrudnoffL.AitkenG. (2014). The challenge and promise of complexity theory for teacher education research. Teachers College Record, 116(5), 1-38.
16.
Cochran-SmithM.GleesonA.MitchellK. (2010). Teacher education for social justice: What’s pupil learning got to do with it?Berkeley Review of Education, 1(1), 35-61.
17.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (1990). Teacher research and research on teaching: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11. doi:10.3102/0013189X019002002
18.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305. doi:10.2307/1167272
19.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20.
Cochran-SmithM.EllF.GrudnoffL.HaighM.HillM.LudlowL. (2016). Initial teacher education: What does it take to put equity at the center?Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 67-78. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.006
21.
CoganM. L. (1955). The problem of defining a profession. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 297, 105-111.
22.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2008). Educational Leadership Policy Standards: Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC). Washington, DC: Author.
23.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2011). InTASC model core teaching standards—A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
CroweE. (2010). Measuring what matters: A stronger accountability model for teacher education. Washington, DC: Centre for American Progress.
25.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1047-1085. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00372.x
26.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 35-47. doi:10.1177/0022487109348024
28.
Darling-HammondL. (2012). Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and supporting effective teaching. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
29.
DavisB.SumaraD. (2010). “If things were simple . . . ”: Complexity in education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(4), 856-860. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01499.x
30.
DelandshereG.ArensS. A. (2001). Representations of teaching and standards-based reform: Are we closing the debate about teacher education?Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(5), 547-566. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00013-0
31.
DeLucaC.BellaraA. (2013). The current state of assessment education: Aligning policy, standards, and teacher education curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 356-372. doi:10.1177/0022487113488144
32.
Department for Education & Skills. (2004). National standards for headteachers. London, England: Author.
33.
Department of Education. (2012). Teachers’ standards: Effective from 1 september 2012. London, England: Department of Education, Crown copyright.
34.
DeweyJ. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (2nd revised ed.). Boston, DC: Heath.
35.
DillonJ. T. (2009). The questions of curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(3), 343-359.
36.
DonaldsonM. L. (2013). Principals’ approaches to cultivating teacher effectiveness: Constraints and opportunities in hiring, assigning, evaluating, and developing teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 838-882. doi:10.1177/0013161X13485961
37.
Education Council. (2015). Practising teacher criteria. Wellington: Education Council New Zealand.
38.
FairbanksC. M.DuffyG. G.FairclothB. S.YeHeLevinB.RohrJ.SteinC. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 161-171. doi:10.1177/0022487109347874
39.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00141
40.
FenstermacherG. D. (1978). A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness. Review of Research in Education, 6, 157-185. doi:10.2307/1167245
41.
FenstermacherG. D.RichardsonV. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186-213. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00462.x
42.
FeuersteinA. (2001). “Hyper-rationalization” revisited. The Educational Forum, 65(2), 108-118. doi:10.1080/00131720108984476
43.
FlexnerA. (1915). Is social work a profession?School and Society, 1, 901-911.
44.
FlexnerA. (2001). Is social work a profession?Research on Social Work Practice, 11(2), 152-165. doi:10.1177/104973150101100202
45.
FurlongJ.BartonL.MilesS.WhitingC.WhittyG. (2000). Teacher education in transition: Re-forming professionalism?Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
46.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
GayG. (2010). Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 143-152. doi:10.1177/0022487109347320
48.
General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland. (2011). Teaching: The reflective profession. Belfast, UK: Author.
49.
The General Teaching Council for Scotland. (2006). Standard for initial teacher education. Edinburgh, Scotland: Author.
50.
The General Teaching Council for Scotland. (2012). The Standard for registration: Mandatory requirements for registration with the General Teaching Council for Scotland. Edinburgh, Scotland: Author.
51.
GoldsteinJ. (2009). Designing transparent teacher evaluation: The role of oversight panels for professional accountability. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 893-933.
52.
GriffithsD. (1997). The case for theoretical pluralism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 25(4), 371-380. doi:10.1177/0263211X97254003
53.
GrossmanP. (2008). Responding to our critics: From crisis to opportunity in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(1), 10-23. doi:10.1177/0022487107310748
54.
GrossmanP.CohenJ.RonfeldtM.BrownL. (2014). The test matters: The relationship between classroom observation scores and teacher value added on multiple types of assessment. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 293-303. doi:10.3102/0013189X14544542
55.
HabermanM. (2004). Star teachers: The ideology and best practice of effective teachers of diverse children and youth in poverty. Houston, TX: The Haberman Educational Foundation.
56.
HammernessK.Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ.BerlinerD.Cochran-SmithM.McDonaldM.ZeichnerK. M. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (1st ed., pp. 358-389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
57.
HareW. (2003a). The ideal of open-mindedness and its place in education. Journal of Thought, 38(2), 3-10. doi:jstor.org/stable/42589737
58.
HareW. (2003b). Is it good to be open-minded?International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 17(1), 73-87. doi:10.5840/ijap20031718
59.
HelsingD. (2007). Regarding uncertainty in teachers and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1317-1333. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.007
60.
HillH. C.RowanB.BallD. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. doi:10.3102/00028312042002371
61.
HornI. S.LittleJ. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181-217. doi:10.3102/0002831209345158
JacksonP. W. (1974). Life in classrooms. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
64.
KingM. B. (1994). Locking ourselves in: National standards for the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(1), 95-108. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)90043-4
KleinhenzE.SerafiniF. (2002). Possibilities and challenges: The national board for professional teaching standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 316-327. doi:10.1177/0022487102053004004
67.
KunterM.KlusmannU.BaumertJ.RichterD.VossT.HachfeldA. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805-820. doi:10.1037/a0032583
68.
LabareeD. G. (2000). On the nature of teaching and teacher education: Difficult practices that look easy. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 228-233. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003011
69.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2008). A letter to our next president. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(3), 235-239. doi:10.1177/0022487108317466
70.
LadwigJ. G. (2010). Beyond academic outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 113-141. doi:10.3102/0091732X09353062
71.
Le FevreD.RobinsonV. M. J.SinnemaC. E. L. (2014). Genuine inquiry: Widely espoused yet rarely enacted. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43, 1-17. doi:10.1177/1741143214543204
72.
LeinhardtG.YoungK. M.MerrimanJ. (1995). Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory. Learning and Instruction, 5(4), 401-408. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00025-9
73.
LewisW. D.YoungT. V. (2013). The politics of accountability: Teacher education policy. Educational Policy, 27(2), 190-216. doi:10.1177/0895904812472725
74.
LudlowL. H.EnterlineS. E.Cochran-SmithM. (2008). Learning to teach for social justice-beliefs scale: An application of Rasch measurement principles. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 40(4), 194-214.
75.
NelsenP. J. (2015). Intelligent dispositions: Dewey, habits and inquiry in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 86-97. doi:10.1177/0022487114535267
76.
New Zealand Teachers Council. (2007). Graduating teacher standards. Wellington: Author.
77.
New Zealand Teachers Council. (2012). New Zealand teachers’ council code of ethics for registered teachers. Wellington: Author.
78.
OpferV. D.PedderD. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609
79.
PalmerR. R. (1953). Is teaching a profession?Phi Delta Kappan, 34(4), 139-142.
80.
PhelpsP. H. (2006). The dilemma of dispositions. Clearing House, 79(4), 174-178.
81.
PriestleyM.SinnemaC. (2014). Downgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge in new curricula in Scotland and New Zealand. Curriculum Journal, 25, 50-75
82.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2000a). Quality assurance in initial teacher education: The standard for initial teacher education in Scotland. Gloucester, Scotland: Author.
83.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2000b). Quality assurance in initial teacher education: The Standard for initial teacher education in Scotland—Benchmark information. Gloucester, Scotland: Author.
84.
ReynoldsM. (2001). Education for inclusion, teacher education and the teacher training agency standards. Journal of In-Service Education, 27(3), 465-476. doi:10.1080/13674580100200164
85.
RobinsonV. M. J.Le FevreD.SinnemaC. E. L. (Eds.). (2016). Open-to-learning Leadership: How to build trust while tackling tough issues. Melbourne, Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education.
86.
SatoM. (2014). What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edTPA?Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 421-434. doi:10.1177/0022487114542518
87.
SatoM.WeiR. C.Darling-HammondL. (2008). Improving teachers’ assessment practices through professional development: The case of national board certification. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 669-700.
88.
SchunkD.ZimmermanB. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
89.
SchwabJ. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 78, 1-24.
90.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
91.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
92.
ShulmanL. S. (2004). Professional development: Leaning from experience. In WilsonS. (Ed.), The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach (pp. 503-522). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
93.
SinnemaC. (2015). The ebb and flow of curricular autonomy: Balance between local freedom and national prescription in curricula. In WyseD.HaywardL.PandyaJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 965-983). London, England: SAGE.
94.
SinnemaC.AitkenG. (2011). Teaching as inquiry in the New Zealand curriculum: Origins and implementation. In ParrJ.HedgesH.MayS. (Eds.), Changing trajectories of teaching and learning (pp. 29-48). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
SinnemaC.AitkenG. (2013). Emerging international trends in curriculum. In PriestleyM.BiestaG. J. J. (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
97.
SinnemaC.AitkenG. (2014). Teachers’ use of research to improve practice: Why should we, how could we? In St GeorgeA.BrownS.O’NeillJ. (Eds.), Facing the big questions in teaching (2nd ed., pp. 146-153). Melbourne, Australia: Cengage.
98.
SinnemaC.LudlowL. H. (2013). A Rasch approach to the measurement of responsive curriculum practice in the context of curricula reform. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 12(2), 33-57.
99.
SpiegelJ. S. (2012). Open-mindedness and intellectual humility. Theory and Research in Education, 10(1), 27-38. doi:10.1177/1477878512437472
100.
StenhouseL. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London, England: Heinemann Educational Books.
101.
TabaH. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Harcout, Brace & World.
102.
TalbotM. (2004). Monkey see, monkey do: A critique of the competency model in graduate medical education. Medical Education, 38(6), 587-592. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01794.x
103.
Teacher Quality and Educational Leadership Taskforce. (2003). A national framework for professional standards for teaching. Carlton South, Australia: Curriculum Cooperation.
104.
Training and Development Agency for Schools. (2007). Professional standards for teachers: Core. London, England: Author.
105.
TurnerE. E.DrakeC. (2016). A review of research on prospective teachers’ learning about children’s mathematical thinking and cultural funds of knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 32-46. doi:10.1177/0022487115597476
106.
TylerK. M.BoykinA. W.WaltonT. R. (2006). Cultural considerations in teachers’ perceptions of student classroom behavior and achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 998-1005. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.017
107.
TylerR. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
108.
WangJ.LinE.SpaldingE.KleckaC. L.OdellS. J. (2011). Quality teaching and teacher education: A kaleidoscope of notions. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(5), 331-338.
WiseA. E.LeibbrandJ. A. (2001). Standards in the new millennium: Where we are, where we’re headed. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 244-255. doi:10.1177/0022487101052003007
112.
WoolfS. B. (2014). Special education professional standards: How important are they in the context of teacher performance evaluation?Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(4), 276-290. doi:10.1177/0888406414557284
113.
YingerR. J.Hendricks-LeeM. S. (2000). The language of standards and teacher education reform. Educational Policy, 14(1), 94-106. doi:10.1177/0895904800014001008
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
