We offer a comparative investigation of the compensation and benefits afforded to cooperating teachers (CTs) by teacher education programs (TEPs) in 1957-1958 and 2012-2013. This investigation replicates and extends a description of the compensation practices of 20 U.S. TEPs published by VanWinkle in 1959. Data for the present investigation came from 18 of those TEPs. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analyses were used to identify trends and make comparisons across the two time periods. Findings indicate that compensation for CTs continues to fall into five categories: (a) monetary compensation, (b) professional learning opportunities, (c) CT role-focused resources, (d) engaging CTs in the college/university community, and (e) professional recognition. Changes in the nature and quality of benefits indicate that in many instances, the programs in our sample offer less to their CTs than they did in 1957-1958 while expectations for CTs have historically increased.
AchinsteinB.AthanasesS. Z. (2005). Focusing new teachers on diversity and equity: Toward a knowledge base for mentors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 843-862. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.017
AndersonL. M.StillmanJ. A. (2013). Student teaching’s contribution to preservice teacher development: A review of research focused on the preparation of teachers for urban and high-needs contexts. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 3-69. doi:10.3102/0034654312468619
4.
BarkerB. O.BurnettK. R. (1994). Monetary stipends for cooperating teachers: What do we pay them?The Teacher Educator, 30(1), 15-21. doi:10.1080/08878739409555071
5.
BartlettL. (2004). Expanding teacher work roles: A resource for retention or a recipe for overwork?Journal of Educational Policy, 19(5), 565-582. doi:10.1080/0268093042000269144
6.
BashanB.HolsblatR. (2012). Co-teaching through modeling processes: Professional development of students and instructors in a teacher training program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership In Learning, 20(2), 207-226. doi:10.1080/13611267.2012.678972
7.
BeltonS.WoodsC.DunningC.MeeganS. (2010). The evaluation of a cooperating physical education teachers programme (COPET). European Physical Education Review, 16(2), 141-154. doi:10.1177/1356336X10381302
ClarkeA. (2006). The nature and substance of cooperating teacher reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 910-921. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.039
11.
ClarkeA.TriggsV.NielsenW. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163-202. doi:10.3102/0034654313499618
EdelskyC. (2005). Relatively speaking: McCarthyism and teacher-resisters. In PoynerL.WolfeP. (Eds.), Marketing fear in America’s public schools: The real war on literacy (pp. 11-28). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
14.
FairbanksC. M.FreedmanD.KahnC. (2000). The role of effective mentors in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 102-112. doi:10.1177/002248710005100204
GanserT. (2002). How teachers compare the roles of cooperating teacher and mentor. The Educational Forum, 66(4). 380-385. doi:10.1080/00131720208984858
17.
GoldhaberD.GroutC.HoldenK. L.BrownN. (2015). Crossing the border? Exploring the cross-state mobility of the teacher workforce. Educational Researcher, 44(8), 421-431. doi:10.3102/0013189X15613981
18.
GrahamP. (1999). Powerful influences: A case of one student teacher renegotiating his perceptions of power relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(5), 523-540. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00064X
19.
GreenbergJ.PomeranceL.WalshK. (2011). A study of student teaching in the United States. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
20.
HahnW. (1951). Current practices and problems in student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 2(2), 118-122. doi:10.1177/002248715100200209
21.
HallK. M.DraperR. J.SmithL. K.BulloughR. V.Jr. (2008). More than a place to teach: Exploring the perceptions of the roles and responsibilities of mentor teachers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(3), 328-345. doi:10.1080/13611260802231708
22.
HammanD.FivesH.OlivarezA. (2007). Efficacy and pedagogical interaction in cooperating and student teacher dyads. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 41/42, 55-63.
23.
HastingsW. (2004). Emotions and the practicum: The cooperating teachers’ perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10(2), 135-148. doi:10.1080/1354060042000187991
24.
HastingsW.SquiresD. (2002). Restructuring and reculturing: Practicum supervision as professional development for teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 79-91. doi:10.1080/13598660120114995
25.
HudsonP.HudsonS. (2010). Mentor educators’ understandings of mentoring preservice primary teachers. The International Journal of Learning, 17(2), 157-170.
26.
KahnB. (2001). Portrait of success: Cooperating teachers and the student teaching experience. Action in Teacher Education, 22(4), 48-58. doi:10.1080/01626620.2001.10463029
27.
KnowlesJ. G.ColeA. L. (1996). Developing practice through field experiences. In MurrayF. B. (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 648-688). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
KorinekL. A. (1989). Teacher preferences for training and compensation for field supervision. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 46-57. doi:10.1177/002248718904000610
29.
KorthagenF. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77-97. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
30.
LabareeD. F. (2008). An uneasy relationship: The history of teacher education in the university. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (3rd ed., pp. 290-306). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
32.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
33.
PorterA.McMakenJ.HwangJ.YangR. (2011). Common core standards the new US intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103-116. doi:10.3102/0013189X11405038
34.
SandersW. L. (2000). Value-added assessment from student achievement data: Opportunities and hurdles. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(4), 329-339. doi:10.1023/A:1013008006096
35.
SchreckerE. W. (1986). No ivory tower: McCarthyism and the universities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
SimpsonT.HastingsW.HillB. (2007). “I knew that she was watching me”: The professional benefits of mentoring. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(5), 481-498. doi:10.1080/13540600701561695
37.
SinclairC.DowsonM.Thistleton-MartinJ. (2006). Motivations and profiles of cooperating teachers: Who volunteers and why?Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(3), 263-279. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.008
38.
StrogilosV.StefanidisA. (2015). Contextual antecedents of co-teaching efficacy: Their influence on students with disabilities’ learning progress, social participation and behaviour improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 218-229. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.008
VanWinkleH. (1959). What’s happening in teacher education: Public relations and cooperating teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 10(1), 125-128. doi:10.1177/002248715901000129
41.
WangJ.OdellS. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546. doi:10.3102/00346543072003481
42.
WayneA. J.YoungsP. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122. doi:10.3102/00346543073001089
43.
WeissE. M.WeissS. (2001). Doing reflective supervision with student teachers in a professional development school culture. Reflective Practice, 2(2), 125-154. doi:10.1080/14623940120071343
44.
ZeichnerK. (2002). Beyond traditional structures of student teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 59-64.
45.
ZeichnerK. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99. doi:10.1177/0022487109347671
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
