The Impact of Preservice Preparation and Early Career Support on Novice Teachers’ Career Intentions and Decisions

Abstract

A rationale for providing high-quality support during teachers’ early years is to develop further the skills teachers acquire during preparation and to help overcome weaknesses that might lead them to abandon the profession. Yet, almost no consideration has been given to potential interactions between preservice preparation and induction support received. This study utilizes survey and administrative data to examine the effects, including interactions, of preservice preparation and early career support on new teachers’ career intentions and decisions. Consistent with previous research, we find a direct association between perceived preparation quality and leaving teaching. Moreover, we find the quality and comprehensiveness of mentoring and induction to be related to teachers’ intentions and decisions. Our results also suggest that comprehensive support moderates the relationship between preservice preparation and intentions to leave. The findings point to the importance of considering preservice preparation in combination with induction support in efforts to address teacher attrition.

Keywords

recruitment and retention preservice education teacher induction quantitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allensworth

Ponisciak

Mazzeo

(2009). The schools teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago public schools. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.

Andrew

Schwab

R. L.

(1995). Has reform in teacher education influenced teacher performance? An outcome assessment of graduates of eleven teacher education programs. Action in Teacher Education, 17, 43-53.

Arum

Roksa

(2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Barnes

Crowe

Schaefer

(2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five school districts: A pilot study. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future.

Borman

G. D.

Dowling

N. M.

(2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 367-409. doi:10.3102/0034654308321455

Boyd

Grossman

Ing

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303-333. doi:10.3102/0002831210380788

Boyd

Grossman

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176-216.

Boyd

Grossman

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2009). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement (CALDER Working Paper No. 23). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Rockoff

Wyckoff

(2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 793-818. doi:10.1002/pam.20377

10.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Ronfeldt

Wyckoff

(2011). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications to transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 88-110. doi:10.1002/pam.20545

11.

Crowe

(2010). Measuring what matters: A stronger accountability model for teacher education. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.

12.

Crowe

(2011). Race to the top and teacher preparation: Analyzing state strategies for ensuring real accountability and fostering program innovation. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.

13.

Darling-Hammond

Chung

Frelow

(2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286-302. doi:10.1177/0022487102053004002

14.

Duke

Karson

Wheeler

(2006). Do mentoring and induction programs have greater benefits for teachers who lack preservice training? Journal of Public and International Affairs, 17. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/jpia/past-issues-1/2006/4.pdf

15.

Executive Office of the President. (2011). Teacher jobs at risk. Washington, DC: The White House. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/teacher_jobs_at_risk_report.pdf

16.

Feiman-Nemser

(2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.

17.

Fleener

Dahm

P. F.

(2007). Elementary teacher attrition: A comparison of the effects of professional development schools and traditional campus-based programs. Teacher Education and Practice, 20(3), 263-283.

18.

Goldhaber

Gross

Player

(2011). Teacher career paths, teacher quality, and persistence in the classroom: Are public schools keeping their best? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 57-87. doi:10.1002/pam.20549

19.

Goldhaber

Liddle

(2012). The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement (CALDER working paper 65). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.

20.

Goldrick

Osta

Barlin

Burn

(2012). Review of state policies on teacher induction. Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center.

21.

Grissmer

D. W.

Kirby

S. N.

(1992). Patterns of attrition among Indiana teachers, 1965-1987. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

22.

Guarino

C. M.

Santibanez

Daley

G. A.

(2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173-208. doi:10.3102/00346543076002173

23.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326-354.

24.

Hanushek

E. A.

Rivkin

(2010). Constrained job matching: Does teacher job search harm disadvantaged urban schools? (NBER Working Paper No. 15816). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

25.

Imazeki

(2005). Teacher salaries and teacher attrition. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 431-449.

26.

Ing

Loeb

(2008). Assessing the effectiveness of teachers from different pathways: Issues and results. In Grossman

Loeb

(Eds.), Alternative routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education (pp. 157-186). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

27.

Ingersoll

Merrill

May

(2012). Retaining teachers: How preparation matters. Educational Leadership, 69(8), 30-34.

28.

Ingersoll

R. M.

(2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534.

29.

Ingersoll

R. M.

Strong

(2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201-233. doi:10.3102/0034654311403323

30.

Johnson

S. M.

Birkeland

S. E.

(2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581-617. doi:10.3102/00028312040003581

31.

Kane

T. J.

Rockoff

J. E.

Staiger

D. O.

(2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27, 615-631. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.05.005

32.

Kapadia

Coca

Easton

J. Q.

(2007). Keeping new teachers: A first look at the influences of induction in the Chicago public schools. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.

33.

Kaplan

A. F.

Knight

K. W.

Parks

R. D.

(2008). Effect of the Urban Academies of Broward County, Florida, on teacher preparation, supply, and satisfaction. ERS Spectrum, 26(1), 11-22.

34.

Kee

A. N.

(2012). Feelings of preparedness among alternatively certified teachers: What is the role of program features? Journal of Teacher Education, 63(1), 23-38. doi:10.1177/0022487111421933

35.

Kirby

S. N.

Berends

Naftel

(1999). Supply and demand of minority teachers in Texas: Problems and prospects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 47-66.

36.

Ladd

H. F.

(2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 235-261. doi:10.3102/0162373711398128

37.

Levine

(2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project.

38.

Loeb

Darling-Hammond

Luczak

(2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80, 44-70.

39.

Mantle-Bromley

Gould

L. M.

McWhorter

B. A.

Whaley

D. C.

(2000). The effect of program structure on new teachers’ employment and program satisfaction patterns. Action in Teacher Education, 22(1), 1-14.

40.

Noell

Burns

J. M.

Gansle

K. A.

(2009). Value added assessment of teacher preparation in Louisiana: 2005-06 to 2007-08. Retrieved from http://www.laregentsarchive.com/Academic/TE/2009/2008-09VA%288.27.09%29.pdf

41.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

P. T.

(2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

42.

Plecki

M. L.

Elfers

A. M.

Nakamura

(2012). Using evidence for teacher education program improvement and accountability: An illustrative case of the role of value-added measures. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 318-334. doi:10.1177/0022487112447110

43.

Quartz

K. H.

& the TEP Research Group. (2003). “Too angry to leave”: Supporting new teachers’ commitment to transform urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 99-111. doi:10.1177/0022487102250284

44.

Quartz

K. H.

Thomas

Anderson

Masyn

Lyons

K. B.

Olsen

(2008). Careers in motion: A longitudinal retention study of role changing among early-career urban educators. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 218-250.

45.

Reynolds

Ross

S. M.

Rakow

J. H.

(2002). Teacher retention, teaching effectiveness, and professional preparation: A comparison of professional development school and non-professional development school graduates. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 289-303.

46.

Reynolds

Wang

(2005). Teacher retention: What role does professional development school preparation play? New Educator, 1(3), 205-229. doi:10.1080/15476880590966312

47.

Rice

J. K.

(2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

48.

Ronfeldt

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2011). How teacher turnover harms student achievement (NBER Working Paper No. 17176). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

49.

Shen

(1997). Has the alternative certification policy materialized its promise? A comparison between traditionally and alternatively certified teachers in public schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 276-283. doi:10.3102/01623737019003276

50.

Slaughter

Rhoades

(2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Politics, markets, state and higher education. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.

51.

Smith

T. M.

Ingersoll

R. M.

(2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681-714. doi:10.3102/00028312041003681

52.

Stinebrickner

T. R.

(1998). An empirical investigation of teacher attrition. Economics of Education Review, 17(2), 127-136.

53.

Stinebrickner

T. R.

(2002). An analysis of occupational change and departure from the labor force: Evidence of the reasons that teachers leave. Journal of Human Resources, 37(1), 192-216.

54.

The Teaching Commission. (2004). Teaching at risk: A call to action. New York, NY: Author.

55.

Texas Center for Educational Research. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved from www.tcer.org/research/documents/teacher_turnover_full.doc

56.

Theobald

N. D.

Laine

S. W. M.

(2003). The impact of teacher turnover on teacher quality: Findings from four states. In Plecki

M. L.

Monk

D. H.

(Eds.), School finance and teacher quality: Exploring the connections (pp. 33-54). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

57.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the top program executive summary. Washington, DC: Author.

58.

Wechsler

M. E.

Caspary

Humphrey

D. C.

Matsko

K. K.

(2010). Examining the effects of new teacher induction. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

59.

Wilson

S. M.

Floden

R. E.

Ferrini-Mundy

(2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider’s view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 190-204. doi:10.1177/0022487102053003002

60.

Yost

D. S.

(2006). Reflection and self-efficacy: Enhancing the retention of qualified teachers from a teacher education perspective. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(4), 59-76.

61.

Youngs

(2007). District induction policy and new teachers’ experiences: An examination of local policy implementation in Connecticut. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 797-837.