This exploratory study, based on a content analysis of program descriptions, course syllabi, and related program documents, examined the curricula of three fully merged teacher education programs that were redesigned to better prepare teachers for the full range of diversity in their student populations. In these programs, graduates earn a general and special education elementary license simultaneously. Results suggest that attention to disability is more prevalent than attention to other social identity markers such as race, class, culture, or language.
ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B.TrentS. C.OsherD.OrtizA. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality 1968-2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76, 279-299.
2.
ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B.WaitollerF. (2011). Inclusive education: Examining equity on five continents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
3.
BlantonL. P.PugachM. C. (2007). Collaborative programs in general and special teacher education: An action guide for higher education and state policymakers. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.aacte.org/index.php?/Traditional-Media/Resources/
4.
BlantonL. P.PugachM. C. (2011). Using a classification system to probe the meaning of dual licensure in general and special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 219-234.
5.
BlantonL. P.PugachM. C.FlorianL. (2011, April). Preparing general education teachers to improve outcomes for students with disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education and The National Center for Learning Disabilities. Retrieved from www.aacte.org
6.
BorkoH.ListonD.WhitcombJ. A. (2007). Genres of empirical research in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 3-11.
7.
BrownK. S.WelshL. A.HillK. H.CipkoJ. P. (2008). The efficacy of embedding special education instruction in teacher preparation programs in the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2087-2094.
8.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76, 357-377.
9.
Cochran-SmithM.FriesK. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In Cochran-SmithM.ZeichnerK. M. (Eds.), Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher EducationMahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
EzzyD. (2002). Qualitative analysis: practice and innovation. London, England: Routledge.
11.
FullertonA.RubenB. J.McBrideS.BertS. (2011, Spring). Evaluation of a merged secondary and special education program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 45-60.
12.
GorskiP. C. (2009). What we’re teaching teachers: An analysis of multicultural teacher education coursework syllabi. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 309-318.
13.
HarveyM. W.YsselN.BausermanA. D.MerblerJ. B. (2010). Preservice teacher education for inclusion: An exploration of higher education teacher-training institutions. Remedial and Special Education, 31(1), 24-33.
14.
HatchJ.A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
15.
HollandD.DetgenA.GutekunstL. (2008). Preparing elementary school teachers in the southeast region to work with students with disabilities. Report of the Southeast Regional Educational Laboratory at SERVE Center, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
16.
JenkinsA. A.PatemanB.BlackR. S. (2002). Partnerships for dual preparation in elementary, secondary, and special education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 23(6), 359-371.
17.
JonesS. D.Messenheimer-YoungT. (1989). Content of special education courses for pre-service general education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 12, 154-159.
18.
KamensM. W. (2007). Learning about co-teaching: A collaborative student teaching experience for preservice teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30(3), 155-166.
19.
MarshallK. J.HerrmannB. A. (1990). A collaborative metacognitive training model for special education and regular education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13, 96-104.
20.
McKenzieR. G. (2009). A national survey of pre-service preparation for collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(4), 379-393.
21.
McLaughlinM. J. (2010). Evolving interpretations of educational equity and students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 265-278.
22.
MillerP. S.StaytonV. D. (1998). Blended interdisciplinary teacher preparation in early education and intervention: A national study. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 49-58.
23.
National Center for Improving Personnel Preparation in Special Education. (2012). 325T. Available at http://ncipp.education.ufl.edu
24.
NowacekE. J.BlantonL. P. (1996). A pilot project investigating the influence of a collaborative methods course on preservice elementary education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19, 298-312.
25.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P. (2009). A conceptual framework for conducting research on collaborative teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 575-582.
27.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P.BovedaM. (in press). Preparing general education and special education teachers for inclusion and collaboration: Transcending the structural divide, rethinking the grand narrative. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris/KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation. London, England: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
28.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P.CorreaV. (2011). An historical perspective on the role of collaboration in teacher education reform: Making good on the promise of teaching all students. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 183-200.
PugachM. C.SeidlB. L. (1998). Responsible linkages between diversity and disability: A challenge for special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 319-333.
31.
SandsD. I.DuffieldJ. A.ParsonsB. A. (2006). Evaluating infused content in a merged special education and general education teacher preparation program. Action in Teacher Education, 28, 92-103.
32.
SeidlB. L.ConleyM.MonobeG.RiveraJ.UchidaC.PedrazaL. (2008, April). Making the world we want to live in. A transformative relational approach to preparing teachers for diversity. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York City, NY.
33.
SeidlB.PugachM. C. (2009). Support and teaching in the vulnerable moments: Preparing special educators for diversity. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 11(2), 1-19.
34.
SobelD.Iceman-SandsD.BasileC. (2007). Merging general and special education teacher preparation programs to create an inclusive program for diverse learners. New Educator, 3(2), 241-262.
35.
StaytonV. D.McCollumJ. (2002). Unifying general and special education: What does the research tell us?Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(3), 211-218.
36.
StoddardK.BraunB.HewittM.KoorlandM. A. (2006). Teachers for all children: A combined elementary and special education teacher preparation program and three year evaluation. International Journal of Special Education, 21, 2006.
37.
UtleyB. L. (2009). An analysis of the outcomes of a unified teacher preparation program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(2), 137-149.
38.
Van LaarhovenT. R.MunkD. D.LynchK.BosmaJ.RouseJ. (2007). A model for preparing special and general preservice teachers for inclusive education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 440-455.
39.
VoltzD.ElliottR. (1997). Collaborative teacher roles in facilitating inclusion: Preservice preparation for general and special education. Teacher Educator, 33, 44-60.
40.
VoltzD. L. (2003). Collaborative infusion: An emerging approach to teacher preparation for inclusive education. Action in Teacher Education, 25(1), 5-13.
41.
YoungK. (2011). Institutional separation in schools of education: Understanding the functions of space in general and special education teacher preparation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 483-493.
42.
ZamudioM.RiosF.JaimeA. M. (2008). Thinking critically about difference: Analytical tools for the 21st century. Equity and Excellence in Education, 41(2), 215-229.
43.
ZeichnerK. M. (2005). A research agenda for teacher education. In Cochran-SmithM.ZeichnerK. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 737-759). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
