This study used text-related, video-based case materials to assess teacher candidates’ readiness to communicate with families. Participants (N = 141) rated their efficacy for home–school communication and then responded to a description of a classroom-based challenge regarding one student’s behavioral and academic performance. Next, they evaluated two videos, each capturing how a teacher addressed the challenge in a parent–teacher conference. Cases offered contrasting models of communication effectiveness along two dimensions: structuring and responsiveness. Finally, candidates chose which model did the better job and justified their choice. Findings revealed that candidates had high self-efficacy for communicating with families but generated a small number and range of strategies for dealing with the situation; could discriminate between the models’ effectiveness; and their reasons for choosing one model as best centered on their valuing of structuring or responsiveness and their conceptions of partnership. Content validity and reliability assessments of the research materials are described.
AndersonJ.BowerG. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79(2), 97-123.
2.
AndersonK. J.MinkeK. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward an understanding of parents’ decision making. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 311-323.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
4.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
6.
BoethelM. (2003). Diversity: School, family, and community connections—Annual Synthesis 2003. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, National Center for Family and Community Schools. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/connections/resources/diversity-synthesis.pdf
7.
BransfordJ. D.SchwartzD. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 2, 61-100.
8.
BrodyG. H.FlorD. L.GibsonN. M. (1999). Linking maternal efficacy beliefs, developmental goals, parenting practices, and child competence in rural single-parent African American families. Child Development, 70, 1197-1208.
9.
CarminesE. G.ZellerR. A. (1991). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
10.
Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. D. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and should be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
DenzinN. (1984). On understanding emotion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
DeslandesR.BertrandR. (2005). Motivation of parent involvement in secondary-level schooling. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 164-175.
13.
DotgerB. (2010). “I had no idea”: Developing dispositional awareness and sensitivity through a cross-professional pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 805-812.
14.
DotgerB.DotgerS.MaherM. (2010). From medicine to teaching: The evolution of the simulated interaction model. Innovative Higher Education, 35(3), 129-141.
15.
DotgerB.HarrisS.HanselA. (2008). Emerging authenticity: The crafting of simulated parent–teacher candidate conferences. Teaching Education, 19(4), 335-347.
16.
DotgerB.HarrisS.MaherM.HanselA. (2011). Exploring the emotional geographies of parent–teacher candidate interactions: An emergent signature pedagogy. Teacher Educator, 46(3), 208-230.
17.
DunningD.JohnsonK. L.EhrlingerJ.KrugerJ. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83-87.
18.
EpsteinJ. L.SandersM. G. (2006). Preparing educators for school–family–community partnerships: Results of a national survey of colleges and universities. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 81-120.
19.
FanX.ChenM. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1-22.
20.
FerraraM. M.FerraraP. J. (2005). Parents as partners: Raising awareness as a teacher preparation program. Clearing House, 79(2), 77-82.
21.
GelmanR.LucarielloJ. (2002). Role of learning in cognitive development. In GallistelR. (Ed.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 395-444). New York, NY: Wiley.
22.
GentnerD. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
23.
GentnerD.LoewensteinJ.ThompsonL. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393-405.
24.
GentnerD.MarkmanA. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56.
25.
GraggC. I. (1940, October). Because wisdom can’t be told. Harvard Alumni Bulletin, 78-84.
26.
GreenC. L.WalkerJ. M. T.Hoover-DempseyK. V.SandlerH. M. (2007). Parents’ motivations for involvement in children’s education: An empirical test of a theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 532-544.
27.
GreenoJ. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.
28.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s outcomes and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143-154.
29.
GrossmanP.McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
30.
HargreavesA. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811-826.
31.
Hiatt-MichaelD. (2001). Preparing teachers to work with parents: ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
32.
HoyW. K.WoolfolkA. E. (1990). Socialization of student teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 279-300.
33.
HughesJ.KwokO. (2007). Influence of student–teacher and parent–teacher relationships on lower achieving readers’ engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 39-51.
34.
JeynesW. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parent involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35, 202-218.
35.
JeynesW. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42, 92-109.
36.
LaskyS. (2000). The cultural and emotional politics of teacher–parent interactions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16,843-860.
37.
Lawrence-LightfootS. (2003). The essential conversation: What parents and teachers can learn from each other. New York, NY: Ballantine.
38.
MakoulG. (2001). Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: The Kalamazoo Consensus Statement. Academic Medicine, 76(4), 390-393.
39.
NamyL. L.GentnerD. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears: Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 5-15.
40.
Rittle-JohnsonB. J.StarJ. (2009). Compared with what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 529-544.
41.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
ShartrandA. M.WeissH. B.KreiderH. M.LopezM. E. (1997). New skills for new schools: Preparing teachers in family involvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
43.
ShulmanL. S. (2005, February6-8). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. Talk delivered at the Math Science Partnerships (MSP) Workshop: “Teacher Education for Effective Teaching and Learning” Hosted by the National Research Council’s Center for Education, Irv-ine, CA. Retrieved from http://www.taylorprograms.org/images/Shulman_Signature_Pedagogies.pdf
44.
TomaselloM. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
VillegasA. M. (2007). Dispositions in teacher education: A look at social justice. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 370-380.
46.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
WalkerJ. M. T.IceC. L.Hoover-DempseyK. V.SandlerH. M. (2011). Latino parents’ motivations for involvement in their children’s schooling: An exploratory study. Elementary School Journal, 111(3), 409-429.
48.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
