This article presents findings from a qualitative study of first-year elementary teachers who assessed the strengths and weaknesses of their preservice student teaching experiences vis-à-vis their inservice realities. Specifically, the study explores opportunities to learn across student teaching placements and analyzes the degree to which placements present participants with equitable opportunities to build a specialized view of professional practice—one that can support them to enact in urban, high-needs schools the kind of practices that research suggests are crucial to the academic success of historically underserved students. Findings highlight the importance of providing preservice teachers with examples of “what’s possible” in the face of tightly regulated, accountability-driven policies. The authors conclude with suggestions for teacher educators concerning the reorganization of student teaching and the strategic mediation of preservice teachers’ learning to ensure that all preservice teachers receive equitable opportunities to learn in and through their placements in the field.
AchinsteinB.OgawaR. (2006). (In)fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30-63.
2.
AndersonL.StillmanJ. (2010). Opportunities to teach and learn in urban, high-needs schools: Student teachers’ experiences in urban placements. Urban Education, 45(2), 1-33.
3.
AndersonL.StillmanJ. (2011, March25). Moving beyond beliefs: A critical review of the literature on student teaching in and for high-needs urban schools. Paper presented at the Spring Conference of the California Council on Teacher Education, San Jose, CA.
4.
AndersonL.StillmanJ. (in press). Making learning the object: Using cultural historical activity theory to analyze and organize preservice field placements in urban, high-needs schools. Teachers College Record, 114(7).
5.
AthanasesS. Z.de OliveiraL. C. (2008). Advocacy for equity in classrooms and beyond. New teachers’ challenges and responses. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 64-104.
BakerR.MilnerJ. (2006). Complexities of collaboration: Intensity of mentors’ responses to paired and single student teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 28(3), 61-72.
8.
BartoloméL.TruebaE. (2000). Beyond the politics of schools and the rhetoric of fashionable pedagogies: The significance of teacher ideology. In TruebaE.BartoloméL. (Eds.) Immigrant voices: In search of educational equity (pp. 277-292). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
BrockC. H.MooreD. K.ParksL. (2007). Exploring pre-service teachers’ literacy practices with children from diverse backgrounds: Implications for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 898-915.
10.
BuehlerJ.GereA.DallivasC.HavilandV. (2009). Normalizing the fraughtness: How emotion, race, and school context complicate cultural competence. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 408-418.
11.
BulloughR. (1992). Beginning teacher curriculum decision-making, personal teaching metaphors, and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(3), 239-252.
12.
BulloughR.YoungJ.EricksonL.BirrellJ. R.ClarkD.C.EganM. W.. . . SmithG. (2002). Rethinking field experience: Partnership teaching versus single-placement teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 68-80.
13.
Cochran-SmithM. (1991a). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61(3), 279-310.
Cochran-SmithM.ZeichnerK. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
CreswellJ. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). Inequality and the right to learn: Access to qualified teachers in California’s public schools. Teachers College Record, 106(10), 1936-1966.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.
21.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
22.
Feiman-NemserS.BuchmannM. (1987). When is student teaching teacher education?Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 255-273.
23.
FryP.McKinneyL. (1997). A qualitative study of preservice teachers’ early field experiences in an urban, culturally different school. Urban Education, 32(2), 184-201.
24.
FrykholmJ. (2005). Innovative curricula: Catalysts for reform in mathematics teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4), 20-36.
25.
GayG.HowardT. (2001). Multicultural teacher education for the 21st century. Teacher Educator, 36(1), 1-16.
26.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
GutiérrezK. (2006). White innocence: A framework and methodology for rethinking educational discourse. International Journal of Learning, 12(1), 223-230.
29.
GutiérrezK.AsatoJ.SantosM.GotandaN. (2002). Backlash pedagogy: Language and culture and the politics of reform. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural studies, 24(4), 335-351.
30.
HatchT.GrossmanP. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70-85.
31.
HatchT.SunC.GrossmanP.NeiraP.ChangT. (2009). Learning from the practice of veteran and novice teachers: A digital exhibition. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 68-69.
32.
IngersollR. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage?Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
33.
KnoblauchD.Woolfolk-HoyA. (2008). “Maybe I can teach those kids”: The influence of contextual factors on student teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 166-179.
34.
LaBoskeyV. K.RichertA. E. (2002). Identifying good student teaching placements: A programmatic perspective. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 7-34.
35.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.
37.
LaneS.ParachiniN. L.IskenJ. (2003). Developing novice teachers as change agents: Student teacher placements against the grain. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(2) 55-67.
38.
LiebermanA.Pointer MaceD. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1), 77-88.
39.
LloydG. (2007). Strategic compromise: A student teacher’s design of kindergarten mathematics instruction in a high-stakes testing climate. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(4), 328-347.
40.
LuftJ.BraggJ.PetersC. (1999). Learning to teach in a diverse setting: A case study of a multicultural science education enthusiast. Science Education, 83(5), 527-543.
41.
MacGillivrayL.ArdellA. L.CurwenM. S.PalmaJ. (2004). Colonized teachers: Examining the implementation of a scripted reading program. Teaching Education, 15(2), 131-144.
42.
MargolisJ. (2006). New teachers, high-stakes diversity, and the performance-based conundrum. Urban Review, 38(1), 27-44.
43.
MasonT. (1999). Predictors of success in urban teaching: Analyzing two paradoxical cases. Multicultural Education, 6(3), 26-32.
44.
McGintyI.LarenasM. (2004). The power of language and literacy: Student historians for social justice. In MenkartD.MurrayA.ViewJ. (Eds.), Putting the movement back into civil rights teaching (pp. 220-229). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
45.
MilesM.HubermanA. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
47.
OakesJ. (1992). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 12-21.
48.
OlsenB. (2008). Teaching what they learn, learning what they live: How teachers’ personal histories shape their professional development. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
49.
ParksA. N. (2008). Messy learning: Preservice teachers’ lesson study conversations about mathematics and students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1200-1216.
50.
ProctorT.RentzN.JacksonM. (2001). Preparing teachers for urban schools: The role of field experiences. Western Journal of Black Studies, 25(4), 219-227.
RushtonS. (2003). Two preservice teachers’ growth in self-efficacy while teaching in an inner-city school. Urban Review, 35(3), 167-189.
53.
SettlageJ.SoutherlandS. A.SmithL. K.CeglieR. (2009). Constructing a doubt-free teaching self: Self-efficacy, teacher identity, and science instruction within diverse settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 102-125.
54.
SleeterC. (2005). Un-standardizing curriculum: Multicultural teaching in the standards-based classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
55.
SleeterC.StillmanJ. (2007). Navigating accountability pressures. In SleeterC. E. (Ed.), Facing accountability in education: Democracy and equity at risk (pp. 13-29). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
StanulisR. (1995). Classroom teachers as mentors: Possibilities for participation in a professional development school context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(4), 331-344.
58.
StillmanJ. (2009). “Taking back the standards:” Equity-minded teachers’ responses to accountability-related instructional constraints. New Educator, 5(2), 135-160.
59.
StillmanJ. (2011). Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113(1), 133-180.
60.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
62.
van EsE.SherinM. (2008). Mathematics teachers “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276.
63.
VillegasA.LucasT. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20-32.
64.
Walker-DalhouseD.DalhouseA. (2006). Investigating White preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching in culturally diverse classrooms. Negro Educational Review, 57(1-2), 69-84.
65.
WasserJ.BreslerL. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5-15.
66.
WigginsR. A.FolloE. J.EberlyM. B. (2007). The impact of a field immersion program on pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward teaching in culturally diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 653-663.
67.
WeinerL. (1990). Preparing the brightest for urban schools. Urban Education, 25(3), 258-273.
68.
WeismanE.HansenL. (2008). Student teaching in urban and suburban schools: Perspectives of Latino preservice teachers. Urban Education, 43(6), 653-670.
69.
WigginsR.FolloE. (1999). Development of knowledge, attitudes, and commitment to teach diverse student populations. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(2), 94-105.
70.
ZeichnerK. (2002). Beyond traditional structures of student teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 59-64.
71.
ZeichnerK.TabachnickB. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education “washed out” by school experience?Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 7-11.
