Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010-9
Learning from Young Adolescents: The Use of Structured Teacher Education Coursework to Help Beginning Teachers Investigate Middle School Students’ Intellectual Capabilities
In this article, the authors discuss a case study in which beginning teachers interviewed young adolescents as part of structured teacher education coursework designed to challenge teachers’ low expectations for young adolescents. Based on pre- and postsurveys, pre— and post—focus group interviews, classroom field notes, and teachers’ written analysis papers, the authors’ data suggest that the coursework helped to shape changes in beginning teachers’ views of young adolescents’ analytical capabilities and social studies knowledge. However, these shifts in teachers’ thinking about young adolescents’ capabilities did not translate into shifts in the teachers’ ideas about middle school social studies instruction. The authors argue that carefully structured coursework like this interview project holds promise for helping beginning teachers develop new understandings about learners, but attention to students’ abilities must also be accompanied by attention to teachers’ purposes and pedagogical understandings.
Ayers, W. ( 1993). To teach: The journey of a teacher. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
2.
Ball, D.L., & Cohen, D.K. ( 1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp .3-32) . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
3.
Barton, K.C. ( 1997). "I just kinda know": Elementary students’ ideas about historical evidence. Theory and Research in Social Education , 25, 407-430.
4.
Barton, K.C. ( 2008). Research on students’ ideas about history. In L.S. Levstik & C.A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 239-258). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
Barton, K.C., & Levstik, L.S.( 1996). "Back when God was around and everything": The development of children’s understanding of historical time. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 419-454.
6.
Barton, K.C., & Levstik, L.S. ( 2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Barton, K.C., McCully, A.W., & Marks, M.J. ( 2004). Reflecting on elementary children’s understanding of history and social studies: An inquiry project with beginning teachers in Northern Ireland and the United States. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 70-90.
8.
Beane, J.A. ( 1993). A middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
9.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R.T.( 1996). Learning to teach. In D.C. Berliner (Ed.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York, NY: Simon &Schuster.
10.
Bridgeland, J.M., DiIulio, J.J., Jr., & Morison, K.B.( 2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts (Report by Civic Enterprises in association with Peter D. Hart Research Associates) . Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
11.
Brodhagen, B. ( 1995). The situation made us special. In M.W. Apple & J.A. Beane (Eds.), Democratic schools (pp. 83-100). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12.
Bruner, J. ( 1960). The process of education. New York, NY: Vintage.
13.
Conklin, H.G. ( 2007). Methods and the middle: Elementary and secondary preservice teachers’ views on their preparation for teaching middle level social studies. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 31(4). Retrieved from http://www.nmsa.org/portals/0/pdf/publications/RMLE/rmle_vol31_no4.pdf
14.
Conklin, H.G. ( 2008). Promise and problems in two divergent pathways: Preparing social studies teachers for the middle school level. Theory and Research in Social Education, 36(1), 36-65.
15.
Conklin, H.G. ( 2009). Purposes, practices, and sites: A comparative case of two pathways into middle school teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 463-500.
16.
Dinkelman, T. ( 1999). Critical reflection in a social studies methods semester . Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(3), 329-357.
17.
Eccles, J.S., Lord, S., & Midgley, C.( 1991). What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. American Journal of Education, 99, 521-542.
18.
Eccles, J.S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C.M., Reumann, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. ( 1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90-101.
19.
Fehn, B., & Koeppen, K. ( 1998). Intensive document-based instruction in a social studies methods course and student teachers’ attitudes and practice in subsequent field experiences. Theory and Research in Social Education , 26(4), 461-484.
20.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Remillard, J. ( 1995). Perspectives on learning to teach. In F. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 63-91). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Gersten, R., Baker, S.K., Smith-Johnson, J., Dimino, J., & Peterson, A. ( 2006). Eyes on the prize: Teaching complex historical content to middle school students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 264-280.
22.
Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. ( 1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
23.
Goodlad, J.I. ( 1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Grant, S.G. ( 2003). History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in U. S. high school classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Grossman, P., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. ( 1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning and teaching. American Journal of Education, 108, 1-29.
26.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. ( 2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358-389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Hess, D.E. ( 2002). Discussing controversial public issues in secondary social studies classrooms: Learning from skilled teachers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(1), 10-41.
28.
Hinde, E.R., & Perry, N. ( 2007). Elementary teachers’ application of Jean Piaget’s theories of cognitive development during social studies curriculum debates in Arizona. Elementary School Journal, 108(1), 63-79.
29.
Jackson, A., & Davis, G.A. ( 2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
30.
James, J.H. ( 2008). Teachers as protectors: Making sense of preservice teachers’ resistance to interpretation in elementary history teaching. Theory and Research in Social Education, 36(3), 172-205.
31.
Kennedy, M.M., Ball, D.L., & McDiarmid, G.W. (1993). A study package for examining and tracking changes in teachers’ knowledge. East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
32.
King, M.B., Newmann, F.M., & Carmichael, D.L. (2009). Authentic intellectual work: Common standards for teaching social studies. Social Education, 73(1), 43-49.
33.
Lesko, N. ( 2005). Denaturalizing adolescence: The politics of contemporary representations. In E. R. Brown & K. J. Saltman (Eds.), The critical middle school reader (pp. 87-102). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
Levstik, L.S., & Barton, K.C. ( 1996). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Lexmond, A.J. ( 2003). When puberty defines middle school students: Challenging secondary education majors’ perceptions of middle school students, schools, and teaching. In P. G. Andrews & V. A. Anfara Jr. (Eds.), Leaders for a movement: Professional preparation and development of middle school teachers and administrators (pp. 27-52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
36.
Lionni, L. ( 1970). Fish is fish. New York, NY: Pantheon.
37.
McBee, R.H. ( 1996). Can controversial topics be taught in the early grades? The answer is yes!Social Education, 60(1), 38-41.
38.
Newmann, F.M. ( 1991). Promoting higher order thinking in social studies: Overview of a study of sixteen high school departments. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(4), 324-340.
39.
Newmann, F.M., King, M.B., & Carmichael, D.L. (2007). Authentic instruction and assessment: Common standards for rigor and relevance in teaching academic subjects. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Education.
40.
Parker, W. ( 2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life . New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
41.
Parker, W., & Hess, D.E. ( 2001). Teaching with and for discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 273-289.
42.
Rist, R. ( 2000). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 70(3), 257-301.
43.
Saltman, K.J. ( 2005). The social construction of adolescence. In E. R. Brown & K. J. Saltman (Eds.), The critical middle school reader (pp. 15-20). New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
Seixas, P. ( 1994). Preservice teachers assess students’ prior historical understanding. Social Studies, 85, 91-94.
45.
Sleeter, C. ( 2008). Preparing White teachers for diverse students. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 559-582). New York, NY : Routledge.
46.
VanSledright, B. ( 2002).In search of America’s past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
Wilson, S.M. ( 1991). Parades of facts, stories of the past: What do novice history teachers need to know? In M. M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 99-116). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
48.
Yeager, E., & Wilson, E. ( 1997). Teaching historical thinking in the social studies methods course: A case study. Social Studies, 88(3), 121-127.
