Premised on the conception of teacher knowledge as situated and the agency of the teacher in perceiving and exploiting “situated possibilities” in the classroom, this article argues that it is important for teachers to construct local understanding of their work embedded in the local cultural traditions and to explore possibilities for student learning in the context of constraints. The authors report on an investigation of the pedagogical strategies developed by two L2 writing teachers in Hong Kong, which showed that these strategies emerged as the teachers perceived and responded to situated possibilities for learning and that the strategies were rooted in the cultural traditions of the learners as well as the micro-cultures of the classroom. The authors suggest that teacher education programs should provide ample opportunities for teachers to gain a deep understanding of local cultures and to explore opportunities for student learning that build on such cultural traditions.
Arndt, V. ( 1993). Response to writing: Using feedback to inform the writing process. In M. Brock & L. Walters (Eds.), Teaching composition around the Pacific rim: Politics and pedagogy (pp. 90-116). Avon, England: Multilingual Matters.
2.
Benner, P. ( 1994). The tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology in studying health, illness, and caring practices. In P. Benner (Ed.), Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness (pp. 99-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Benner, P., Tanner, C.A., & Chesla, C.A. ( 1996). Expertise in nursing practice. New York, NY: Springer.
4.
Bond, M. H. (Ed.). (1986). The psychology of the Chinese people. Hong Kong SAR, ChinaOxford University Press.
5.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. ( 1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
6.
Carson, J.G., & Nelson, G.L. ( 1996). Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1-19.
7.
Coldron, J., & Smith, R. ( 1999). Active location in teachers’ construction of their professional identities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 711-726.
8.
Fenstermacher, D. ( 1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in the research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 3-56). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
9.
Gao, G. ( 1998). An initial analysis of the effects of face and concern for OTHER in Chinese interpersonal communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 467-482.
10.
Hofstede, G. ( 1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Holliday, A. ( 1999). Small cultures. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 237-264.
12.
Hu, H.C. ( 1944). The Chinese concepts of "face." American Anthropologist, 46, 45-64.
13.
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. ( 1993). Histories of pedagogy, cultures of schooling. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 38-62). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
14.
Ladson-Billings, G.J. ( 1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Education Research Journal, 35, 465-491.
15.
Lave, J. ( 1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Lave, J. ( 1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice : Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). Cambridge , England: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. ( 1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Leinhardt, G. ( 1988). Situated knowledge and expertise in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (pp. 146-168). London, England: Falmer.
19.
Leki, I. ( 1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response . In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 57-68). Cambridge , England: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Leki, I. ( 1995). Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 235-260.
21.
Leki, I., & Carson, J.G. ( 1997). "Completely different worlds": EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 39-69.
22.
Liu, J., & Hansen, J.G. ( 2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
Ma, L. ( 1992). Discussing teacher induction in China and relevant debates in the United States with a Chinese teacher: A conversation with Yu Yi (Craft Paper 92-2). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
24.
Marton, F., & Tsui, A.B.M. (with Chik, P.M., Ko, P.Y., Lo, M.L., Mok, I.A.C., . . . Runesson, U.) (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mittan, R. ( 1989). The peer review process: Harnessing students’ communicative power. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 207-219). New York, NY: Longman.
27.
Nelson, G.L., & Carson, J.G. ( 1998). ESL students' perception of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113-131.
28.
Nelson, G.L., & Murphy, J.M. ( 1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135-142.
29.
Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. ( 2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher , 29 (1), 4-15.
30.
Rogoff, B. ( 1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Russell, J.A., & Yik, M.S.M. (1996). Emotion among the Chinese . In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 166-188). Hong Kong SAR , China: Oxford University Press.
33.
Scribner, S. ( 1984). Studying work intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9-40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Shun, K.-L., & Wong, D.B. ( 2004). Confucian ethics: A comparative study of self, autonomy, and community. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Singelis, T.M., Bond, M.H., Sharkey, W.F., & Lai, C.Y.S. (1999). Unpackaging culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability: The role of self-construals . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 315-341.
36.
Strauss, A. ( 1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Sun, L.K. ( 1991). Contemporary Chinese culture: Structure and emotionality . Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 26, 1-42.
39.
Tarr, N.D., Kim, M.-S., & Sharkey, W.F. ( 2005). The effects of self-construals and embarrassability on predicament response strategies. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 497-520.
40.
Thonus, T. ( 2004). What are the differences? Tutor interactions with first- and second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing , 13, 227-242.
41.
Ting-Toomey, S. ( 1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory . In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213-235). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. ( 1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 187-225.
43.
Triandis, H.C. ( 1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44.
Tsui, A.B.M. ( 2003). Understanding expertise in teaching. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Tsui, A.B.M., & Ng, M.M.Y. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?Journal of Second Language Writing , 9, 147-170.
46.
Tsui, A.B.M., Tong, A.K.K., Andrews, S., Lam, R., Wong, A., Harfitt, G., . . . Ng, M.M.Y. (2004). The study of good practices in secondary schools for enhancing students’ English language proficiency (Consultancy Study for Education and Manpower Bureau, The Government of Hong Kong SAR). Hong Kong SAR, China: University of Hong Kong.
47.
Tsui, A.B.M., & Wong, J.L.N. ( 2009). In search of a third space: Teacher development in Mainland China. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 281-311). Hong Kong SAR, China: Comparative Education Research Centre/Springer Academic.
48.
Tyler, K.M., Boykin, A.W., & Walton, T.R. ( 2006). Cultural considerations in teachers’ perceptions of student classroom behavior and achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 998-1005.
49.
Van Norden, B.W. ( 2000). Confucius and the analects: New essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
Wang, E. ( 2007). ?(Li ji" cheng shu kao) [Study on the Composition of the Book of Rites] (1st ed.). Beijing, China: Zhonghua chu ban she.
51.
Wong, C.K., & Tsoi, M.M. ( 1999). Mental health of Hong Kong children. In N. A. Pryde & M. M. Tsoi (Eds.), Hong Kong’s children: Our past, their future (pp. 153-220). Hong Kong SAR, China: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.
52.
Wu, H.P. ( 2006). ? (Sunzi bing fa) [The Art of War]. Hong Kong SAR, China: World Publishing (Shi jie chu ban she).
