This article examines a praxis model of teacher education and advances a new method for engaging novice teachers in reflective practice and robust teacher learning. Social design experiments—cultural historical formations designed to promote transformative learning for adults and children—are organized around expansive notions of learning and mediated praxis and provide new tools and practices for envisioning new pedagogical arrangements, especially for students from nondominant communities. The authors examine one long-standing social design experiment, the UCLA UC Links/ Las Redes partnership and the work of one exemplary novice teacher to illustrate the importance of mediated, reflective practices in helping apprentice teachers develop a coherent and orienting framework for teaching and learning that has both heuristic and explanatory power. The authors illustrate how cultural historical concepts of learning and development and situated practice become the means for university students to gain distance and reflect on the beliefs and practices that have informed their understandings of teaching and to “rise to the concrete” practices of learning jointly and resonantly.
Artiles, A.J., Trent, S.C., Hoffman-Kipp, P., & Lopez-Torres, L. (2000). From individual acquisition to cultural-historical practices in multicultural teacher education. Remedial and Special Education, 21(2), 79-89.
2.
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A., & Feder, M. ( 2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments.
3.
Boal, A. ( 1995). Rainbow of desire. New York: Routledge.
4.
Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1-39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Brown, A. ( 1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
6.
Bruner, J. ( 2002). Narrative distancing: A foundation of literacy. In J. Brockmeier, M. Wang, & D. Olson (Eds.), Literacy, narrative and culture (pp. 86-93). Richmond, VA: Surrey/Curzon.
7.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (Eds.). (1993). Inside outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
Cole, M. ( 1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
9.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychology and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Cole, M., & Griffin, P. ( 1983). A socio-historical approach to re-mediation. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 5(4), 69-74.
11.
Cole, M., & Levitin, K. ( 2000). A cultural-historical view of human nature. In N. Roughley (Ed.), Being humans: Anthropological universality and particularity in transdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 64-80). Berlin : Walter de Gruyter.
12.
Collins, A. ( 1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scalon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin : Springer-Verlag.
13.
Crosland, K., & Gutiérrez, K. (2003). Standardizing teaching, standardizing teachers: Educational reform and the deprofessionalization of teachers in an English-only era. Educators for Urban Minorities , 2(2), 24-40.
14.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166-173.
15.
Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, P.D., Schoenfeld, A., Stage, E., Zimmerman, T., et al. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Engeström, Y. ( 1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretic approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
17.
Engeström, Y. ( 1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school. Learning and Instruction, 1, 243-259.
18.
Engeström, Y. ( 2004). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 11-21.
19.
Engeström, Y. ( 2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture, and Activity , 14(1-2), 23-39.
20.
Engeström, Y. ( 2008a). From teams to knots: Activity theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Engeström, Y. ( 2008b). Putting Vygotksy to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels , M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363-382). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Erickson, F. ( 2006). Studying side by side: Collaborative action ethnography in educational research. In G. Spindler & L. Hammond (Eds.), Innovations in educational ethnography: Theory, methods and results (pp. 235-257). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Erickson, F., Rishi, B., Cook-Sather, A., Espinoza, M., Jurow, S., Shultz, J., et al. (2007). Students’ experience of school curriculum: The everyday circumstances of granting and withholding assent to learn. In F. M. Connelly (Ed.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 198-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. ( 1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
25.
Griffin, P., & Cole, M. ( 1984). Current activity for the future. In B. Rogoff & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the "zone of proximal development." New directions for child development (pp. 45-63). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Gutiérrez, K. ( 1992). A comparison of instructional contexts in writing process classrooms with Latino children. Education and Urban Society , 24(2), 224-262.
27.
Gutiérrez, K. ( 2006). White innocence: A framework and methodology for rethinking educational discourse and inquiry. International Journal of Learning, 12(10), 223-230.
28.
Gutiérrez, K. ( 2007). Historicizing literacy. In M. Blackburn & C. Clark (Eds.), Literacy research for political action (pp. ixxiii). New York: Peter Lang.
29.
Gutiérrez, K. ( 2008a). Developing sociocritical literacies in the third space . Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148-164.
30.
Gutiérrez, K. ( 2008b). Language and literacies as civil rights. In S. Greene (Ed.), Literacy as a civil right: Reclaiming social justice in literacy teaching and learning (pp. 169-184). New York: Peter Lang.
31.
Gutiérrez, K., Asato, J., Pacheco, M., & Olson, K. ( 2004, April 15). Nationalizing and institutionalizing reform: The effects of educational policies on teachers and english language learners . Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
32.
Gutiérrez, K.D., Hunter, J., & Arzubiaga, A. ( 2009). Re-mediating the university: Learning through sociocritical literacies. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(1), 1-23.
33.
Gutiérrez, K., Morales, P.L., & Martinez, D. ( 2009). Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from non-dominant communities. Review of Research in Educational Research, 33, 212-245.
34.
Gutiérrez, K., & Orellana, M. ( 2006). The "problem" of English learners: Constructing genres of difference. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 505-510.
35.
Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. ( 2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertories of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25.
36.
Hutchins, E. ( 2003, July). Cognitive ethnography. Plenary address at the 25th meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston.
37.
Kleinsasser, A.M. ( 2000). Researchers, reflexivity, and good data: Writing to unlearn . Theory Into Practice, 39, 155-162.
38.
Lee, C.D. ( 2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97-141.
39.
Little, J.W. ( 2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917-946.
40.
Little, J.W. ( 2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913-945.
41.
Noffke, S.E. ( 1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. Review of Research in Education, 22, 305-343.
42.
Rogoff, B. ( 2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford.
43.
Suvorov, A.V. ( 1983). The formation of representation in blind-deaf children . Soviet Psychology, 22(2), 3-28.
44.
Vasquez, O. ( 2003). La clase mágica: Imagining optimal possibilities in a bilingual community of learners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Vossoughi, S. (n.d.). Making the case for difficult text: A study of reading in the migrant program . Manuscript under review.
46.
Vygotsky, L.V. ( 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Walker, V.S. (in press). Hello Professor. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
48.
Williams, R.F. ( 2006). Using cognitive ethnography to study instruction. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
