This study explores the relationship between teacher knowledge and student learning in the area of mathematics by developing and evaluating an innovative approach to assessing teacher knowledge. This approach is based on teachers’ analyses of classroom video clips. Teachers watched 13 video clips of classroom instruction and then provided written comments on the interactions of the teacher, students, and content. The quality of teachers’ analyses, coded using an objective rubric, are shown to be reliable and valid, relating both to another widely used measure of teacher knowledge and to teachers’ own students’ learning (from pre- to posttest).
Ball, D.L. ( 2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education , 51, 241-247.
2.
Ball, D.L., Bass, H., Hill, H., Sleep, L., Phelps, G., & Thames, M. (January, 2006). Knowing and using mathematics in teaching. Paper presented at the Learning Network Conference, Washington, DC.
3.
Ball, D.L., Thames, M.H., & Phelps, G. ( 2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special ? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 398-407.
4.
Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P.L., Chiang, C.P., & Loef, M. ( 1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-531.
5.
Clark, C., & Yinger, J. ( 1978). Research on teacher learning (Research Series No. 12) . East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
6.
Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T., & Tesch-Roemer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
7.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. ( 1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). Reston, VA: National Council of teachers of Mathematics.
8.
Gearhart, M., & Saxe, G.B. ( 2004). When teachers know what students know: Integrating mathematics assessment. Theory Into Practice, 43, 304-313.
9.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D.A. ( 2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
10.
Hiebert, J., Morris, A.K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. ( 2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 47-61.
11.
Hill, H.C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D.L. ( 2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
12.
Hill, H.C., Schilling, S.G., & Ball, D.L. ( 2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105, 11-13.
13.
Hill, H.C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J., & Ball, D.L. ( 2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 111-156). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
14.
Holzinger, K.J., & Swineford, F. ( 1937). The bifactor method. Psychometrica, 2, 41-54.
15.
Jacobs, V.R., Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T.P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. ( 2007). Professional development focused on children’s algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 258-288.
16.
Kersting, N. ( 2008). Using video clips as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 845-861.
17.
Kersting, N.B., Givvin, K.B. & Sotelo, F.L., & Stigler, J.W. ( 2009). Teachers’ analysis of classroom video as a predictor of students’ learning of mathematics: A test worth teaching to?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
18.
Learning Mathematics for Teaching. (2006). A coding rubric for measuring the quality of mathematics in instruction (Technical Report LMT1.06). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Education.
19.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
20.
National Research Council. (Ed.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
National Research Council. (Ed.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22.
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L.V. ( 2004). How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237-257.
23.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. ( 2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525-1567.
24.
Sanders, W.L., & Rivers, J.C. ( 1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research Center.
25.
Sanders, W.L., Saxton, A.M., & Horn, S.P. ( 1997). The Tennessee value-added assessment system: A quantitative outcomes-based approach to educational assessment. In J. Millman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 137-162). Thousands Oaks, CA: Cor-win Press.
26.
Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J.W. ( 2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education , 10, 123-140.
27.
Schmid, J., & Leiman, J.M. ( 1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrica, 22, 53-61.
28.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (in press). On modeling teachers’ in-the-moment decision-making. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), A study of teaching: Multiple lenses, multiple views. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Number X. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
29.
Sherin, M.G., & Han, S. ( 2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183.
30.
Shulman, L.S. ( 1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
31.
Shulman, L. ( 1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the New Reform . Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
32.
Sinclair, N., & Pecheone, L. ( 1991, April). Empirical appraisal of items for innovative teacher tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCTM), Chicago.
33.
van Es, E.A. ( 2003, April). In pursuit of flexible teaching: How mathematics teachers "learn to notice" in the context of a video club. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
34.
van Es, E.A., & Sherin, M.G. ( 2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571-596.
35.
Wolf, L.F., & Smith, J.K. ( 1995). The consequence of consequence: Motivation, anxiety and text performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 8(3), 227-242.
