Cognitively Guided Instruction (CGI) researchers have found that while teachers readily ask initial questions to elicit students’ mathematical thinking, they struggle with how to follow up on student ideas. This study examines the classrooms of three teachers who had engaged in algebraic reasoning CGI professional development. We detail teachers’ questions and how they relate to students’ making explicit their complete and correct explanations. We found that after the initial “How did you get that?” question, a great deal of variability existed among teachers’ questions and students’ responses.
Bargh, J.A., & Schul, Y. ( 1980). On the cognitive benefit of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593-604.
2.
Boaler, J., & Brodie, K. ( 2004). The importance of depth and breadth in the analyses of teaching: A framework for analyzing teacher questions. Proceedings of the 26th meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Toronto , Ontario, Canada.
3.
Carpenter, T.P., Franke, M.L., & Levi, L. ( 2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4.
Cazden, C.B. ( 1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 432-463). New York: Macmillan.
Chi, M.T.H. ( 2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (pp. 161-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Cuban, L. ( 1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1980 (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
8.
Doyle, W. ( 1985). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392-431). New York: Macmillan.
9.
Fisher, R.A. ( 1935). The logic of inductive inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 98, 39-54.
10.
Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T.P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. ( 2001). Capturing teachers’ generative growth: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689.
11.
Franke, M.L., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T.P. (1997). Teachers creating change: Examining evolving beliefs and classroom practice. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 255-282). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Franke, M.L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. ( 1998). Understanding teachers’ self-sustaining change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teaching Education, 14(1), 67-80.
13.
Franke, M.L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. ( 2007). Understanding teaching and classroom practice in mathematics . In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225-256). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
14.
Gall, M. ( 1984). Synthesis of research on teachers’ questioning . Educational Leadership, 42, 40-47.
15.
Graesser, A.C., & Person, N.K. ( 1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
16.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givving, K.B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC : National Center for Education Statistics.
17.
Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. ( 1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 393-425.
18.
Jacobs, V.R., Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T.P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. ( 2007). Professional development focused on children’s algebraic reasoning in elementary schools. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 258-288.
19.
Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. ( 2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 59-80.
20.
King, A. ( 1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111-126.
21.
Mehan, H. ( 1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 119-131). London: Academic Press.
22.
Nathan, M., & Knuth, E. ( 2003). A study of whole class mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175-207.
23.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics .
24.
Rogoff, B. ( 1991). Guidance and participation in spatial planning. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 349-383). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. ( 2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions . Mind, Culture and Activity, 8, 42-76.
26.
Silver, E.A., & Stein, M.K. ( 1996). The QUASAR project: the "revolution of the possible" in mathematics instructional reform in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 30(4), 476-521.
27.
Silver, E.A. ( 1996). Moving beyond learning alone and in silence: Observations from the QUASAR Project concerning some challenges and possibilities of communication in mathematics classrooms. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 127-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Silver, E.A., & Smith, M.S. ( 1996). Building discourse communities in mathematics classrooms: A worthwhile but challenging journey. In P. Elliott (Ed.), Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond (pp. 20-28). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
29.
Smith, M.S. ( 2000). Balancing old and new: An experienced middle school teacher’s learning in the context of mathematics instructional reform. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 351-375.
30.
Stein, M.K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M.S. ( 2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. J. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319-369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
31.
Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. ( 1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
32.
Webb, N.M., Nemer, K.M., & Ing, M. ( 2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 63-119.
33.
Webb, N.M., & Palincsar, A.S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan .
34.
Wood, T. ( 1998). Funneling or focusing? Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics class. In H. Steinbring, M. G. Bartolini-Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167-178). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
35.
Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. ( 1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 587-616.
