This study examines the impact of intensive mentoring as an induction program component aimed at improving teacher quality in ways that link teaching to student engagement. The Atmosphere, Instruction/Content, Management, and Student Engagement (AIMS) measure of teaching practice, focused on a research-based conception of high-quality teaching known as effective balanced instruction, was used to measure the impact of the intervention. Using a matched comparison group design with 24 beginning teachers, the study tested the effects on teaching practice of intensive mentoring. Findings indicate that the improvement in the beginning teachers' AIMS scores from fall to spring was greater for the experimental group than for the comparison group of teachers.
Allen, D. (1998). Assessing student learning: From grading to understanding . New York: Teachers College Press .
2.
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2004). Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality new teachers . Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
3.
Allington, D.L., & Johnston, P.H. (2002). Reading to learn: Lessons from exemplary fourth-grade classrooms. New York: Guilford.
4.
Ball, D. (2000). Forward. In M. K. Stein, M. S. Smith, M. A. Henningsen & E. Silver (Eds.), pp. ix-xiv. Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction (pp.). New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Bogner, K., Raphael, L.M., & Pressley, M. (2002). How Grade 1 teachers motivate literate activity by their students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 135-165.
6.
Bohn, C., Roehrig, A., & Pressley, M. (2004). The first days of school in the classrooms of two more effective and four less effective primary-grades teachers. Elementary School Journal, 104(4), 269-287.
7.
Britton, E., Paine, L., Pimm, D., & Raizen, S. (2003). Comprehensive teacher induction: Systems for early career learning. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
8.
Carnegie Corporation of New York. (2001). Teachers for a new era. Retrieved December 28, 2006, from http://www.carnegie.org/reporter/03/foundation_roundup/newera.html
9.
Day, J.P., Boothroyd, K., Johnston, P., & Cedeno, M. (1999, December). Larger fourth grade study findings in exemplary teaching practices. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
10.
Dolezal, S.E., Welsh, L.M., Pressley, M., & Vincent, M.M. (2003). How nine third-grade teachers motivate student academic engagement. Elementary School Journal, 103, 239-267.
11.
Evertson, C.M., & Smithey, M.W. (2000). Mentoring effects on proteges' classroom practice: An experimental field study. Journal of Educational Research , 93, 294-304.
12.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001a). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record , 103(6), 1013-1055.
13.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001b). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education , 52(1), 17-30.
14.
Feiman-Nemser, S., Schwille, S., Carver, C., & Yusko, B. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction. National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching . Unpublished manuscript, East Lansing, MI.
15.
Fletcher, S., Strong, M., & Villar, A. (2005). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Paper presented at the seventh national New Teacher Center Symposium , San Jose, CA.
16.
Ingersoll, R.M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534.
17.
Ingersoll, R.M. (2004). Why do high-poverty schools have difficulty staffing their classrooms with qualified teachers?Washington, DC : Renewing Our Schools, Securing Our Future, A National Task Force on Public Education.
18.
Ingersoll, R.M., & Smith, T. (2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter? NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 28-40.
19.
Johnson, S.M. (2004). Finders keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Johnson, S.M., Kardos, S.M., Kauffman, D., Liu, E., & Donaldson, M.L. (2004). The support gap: New teachers' early experiences in high-income and low-income schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(61). Available from http://eepa.asu.edu
21.
New Teacher Center. (January, 2005). Mentor Academy handouts. Presentation to Michigan State University, East Lansing.
22.
Paine, L., Pimm, D., Britton, E., Raizen, S., & Wilson, S. (2003). Re-thinking induction: Examples from other countries . In M. Scherer (Ed.), Keeping good teachers (pp. 67-80). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
23.
Pressley, M., Allington, R., Wharton-McDonald, R., Block, C., & Morrow, L. (2001). Learning to read: Lessons from exemplary first-grade classrooms. New York: Guilford.
24.
Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C.C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D., et al. (2001). A study of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(1), 35-58.
25.
Roehrig, A.D. (2003). The effects of mentoring on beginning teacher effectiveness and student outcomes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
26.
Roehrig, A.D., Bohn, C.M., Turner, J., & Pressley, M. (2008). Mentoring beginning primary teachers for exemplary teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 684-702.
27.
Roehrig, A.D., Dolezal, S.E., Mohan-Welsh, L., Bohn, C.M., & Pressley, M. (2003, April). The development of a tool to assess the quality of early-primary grade teachers' classroom practices. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
28.
Roehrig, A.D., Guidry, L., Bodur, Y., Guan, Q., Guo, Y., & Pop, M. (2008). Guided field observations: Variables related to preservice teachers' knowledge about effective primary reading instruction . Unpublished manuscript.
29.
Sanders, W., & Rivers, J.C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future students' academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Value Added Research and Assessment Center.
30.
Smith, T., & Ingersoll, R. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681-714.
31.
Stanulis, R.N. (2006, April). Keeping content and context central: Comprehensive induction in the Michigan State University Teachers for a New Era project . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco .
32.
Stanulis, R.N., & Manning, B. (2002).The teacher's role in creating a positive verbal and nonverbal environment. Early Childhood Education Journal , 30(1), 3-8.
33.
Stanulis, R.N., Meloche, B.H., & Ames, K.T. (2007, April). Challenges in developing, enacting, and analyzing mentoring that focuses on teaching and learning: A university-school collaboration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York .
34.
Stein, M.K., Smith, M.S., Henningsen, M.A., & Silver, E. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
36.
Villar, A. (2004). Measuring the benefits and costs of mentor-based induction: A value-added assessment of new teacher effectiveness linked to student achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center.
37.
Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J.M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first-grade classrooms: Teacher characteristics and student achievement . Elementary School Journal, 99, 101-128.
38.
Wood, A.L. (1999). How can new teachers become the B.E.S.T.? In M. Scherer (Ed.), A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 116-123). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
39.
Wood, A.L., & Stanulis, R.N. (in press). Quality induction: Fourth wave induction programs. New Educator Journal.
