In the context of educational innovation, it is important to investigate how in-service teachers learn and adapt their knowledge to changing professional circumstances. The authors investigated the informal learning of a small number of experienced science teachers in their first few years of teaching a new science syllabus in secondary education in the Netherlands. The storyline method was used to elicit the teachers' perceptions of their learning from experiences at work. The authors focused on three aspects of learning, namely, teachers' learning activities, courses of development, and changed competences. From the results, two qualitatively different ways of learning were identified. Type I represents a revolutionary course of development in a teacher's engagement in mainly individual activities in the working context. Type II symbolizes an evolutionary development in a teacher's participation in both individual and collaborative activities. Implications for professional development initiatives are discussed, as are suggestions for initial teacher education.
American Association for Advancement of Science. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Aikenhead, G.S. (1991). Logical reasoning in science and technology. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Aikenhead, G.S., & Ryan, A.G. (1992). The development of a new instrument. Views on science-technology-society (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477-491.
4.
Bennett, J., & Holman, J. (2002). Context-based approaches to the teaching of chemistry: What are they and what are their effects? In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 165-184). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
5.
Beijaard, D., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Evaluation of story-line methodology in research on teachers' practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation , 25, 47-62.
6.
Boulton-Lewis, G.M., Wills, L., & Mutch, S. (1996). Teachers as adult learners: Their knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching. Higher Education , 32, 89-106.
7.
Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning . Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
8.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan .
10.
Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners. Narrative of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19, 2-14.
12.
Conway, P.F. (2001). Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: From a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 89-106.
13.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports students learning . Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6-11.
14.
De Vos, W., & Reiding, J. (1999). Public understanding of science as a separate subject in secondary schools in the Netherlands. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 711-719.
15.
Fuller, F.F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization . American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207-226.
16.
Gergen, K.J., & Gergen, M.M. (1986). Narrative form and the construction of psychological science. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.),. Narrative psychology: Storied nature of human conduct (pp. 22-44). New York: Praeger.
17.
Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., & Resnick, L.B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Simon & Shuster.
18.
Hunt, A. (1990). SATIS 16-19. Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.
19.
Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult learning in the social context. New York: Croom Helm.
20.
Kapteijn, M. (1997). De experimentele omscholingscursus Algemene Natuurwetenschappen [The experimental in-service training course on public understanding of science] . Tijdschrift voor Didactiek der ß-wetenschappen, 14, 157-176.
21.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers' participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149-170.
23.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Lohman, M.C., & Woolf, N.H. (2001). Self-initiated learning activities of experienced public school teachers: Methods, sources, and relevant organizational influences . Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 7, 59-74.
25.
McLaughlin, M.W. (1997). Rebuilding teacher professionalism in the United States. In A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform (pp. 77-93). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
26.
NEAB (Northern Examinations and Assessment Board) (1998). Science for Public Understanding (syllabus). Harrogate, UK: NEAB.
27.
Oosterheert, J., & Vermunt, J.D. (2003). Knowledge construction in learning to teach: The role dynamic sources. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice , 9, 157-163.
28.
Pigge, F.L., & Marso, R.N. (1997). A seven-year longitudinal multi-factor assessment of teaching concerns development through preparation and early years of teaching . Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 225-235.
29.
Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views on knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher , 29, 4-15.
30.
Schwab, J.J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 3-103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Schwab, J.J. (1963). Biology teachers' handbook. New York: John Wiley.
32.
SLO Voorlichtingsbrochure ANW. (1996). Voorlichtingsbrochure havo/ vwo Algemene natuurwetenschappen [Information brochure on public understanding of science]. Enschede , the Netherlands: Author.
33.
Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 12-16.
34.
Solomon, G., & Perkins, D.N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In P. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 1-24). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
35.
Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (Eds.). (1994). STS education. International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
Van der Sanden, J.M.M., & Teurlings, C.C.J. (2003). Developing competence during practice periods: The learner's perspective. In T. Tuomi-Grohn & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing (pp. 119-136). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
37.
Van Eekelen, I.M., Boshuizen, H.P.A., & Vermunt, J.D. (2005). Self-regulation in higher education teacher learning . Higher Education, 50, 447-471.
38.
Verloop, N. (1999). De leraar. Review studie in opdracht van de programmaraad voor het Onderwijsonderzoek [The teacher. Review study commissioned by the program council for educational research]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: NWO/PROO.
39.
Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching . International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441-461.
40.
Vermunt, J.D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171.
41.
Westbroek, H. (2005). Characteristics of meaningful chemistry education: The case of water quality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
42.
Yager, R. (Ed.). (1996). Science/technology/science as reform in science education. New York: Sunny Press.
