Borko, H., & Whitcomb, J. (in press). Teachers, teaching, and teacher education: Comments on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel's Final Report. Educational Researcher.
2.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Demers, K. (2008). Teacher education as a bridge? In M. Connelly, M. F. He , & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 261-281). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Darling-Hammond, L., & J. Bransford (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
4.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1990). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual alternatives. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 195-211). New York: Macmillan .
5.
Grossman, P., K. Hammerness, & M. McDonald (in press). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice.
6.
Grossman, P., & M. McDonald. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
7.
Kazemi, E., & Franke, M.L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective Inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203-235.
8.
Kazemi, E., Lampert, M., & Ghousseini, H. (2007). Conceptualizing and using routines of practice in mathematics teaching to advance professional education . Report to the Spencer Foundation, Chicago. Retrieved on August 1, 2008, from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/ltp/files/routinesmathematics.pdf
9.
Liston, D., & Zeichner, K. (1991). Teacher education and the social conditions of schooling. New York: Routledge.
10.
National Council on Teacher Quality. (2006 ). What education schools aren't teaching about reading-And what elementary teachers aren't learning. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/nctq_reading_study_app_20071202065019.pdf
11.
National Council on Teacher Quality. (2008 ). No common denominator: The preparation of elementary teachers in mathematics by American education schools. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/nctq_ttmath_fullreport_20080717081714.pdf
12.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008 a). Chapter 5: Report of the Task Group on Teacher Education . Retrieved July 16, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/teachers.pdf
13.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008 b). Foundations of success: Final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf
14.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/smallbook_pdf.pdf
15.
Sockett, H. (2008). The moral and epistemic purposes of teacher education . In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 45-65). New York: Routledge/Taylor Francis Group and Association of Teacher Educators.
16.
Whitcomb, J. (in press). Conceptions of teacher education. In N. Verloop (Ed.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Oxford , UK: Elsevier.
17.
Wilson, S., & Tamir, E. (2008). How understanding challenge(r)s might improve the preparation of teachers. In M. Cochran-Smith , S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 908-936). New York: Routledge/Taylor Francis Group and Association of Teacher Educators.
