Genres of Empirical Research in Teacher Education

American Educational Research Association . (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Retrieved September 17, 2006, from www.aera.net/opportunities/?id=1480

Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.

Borko, H. , Whitcomb, J. , & Byrnes, K. (in press). Genres of research in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith , S. Feiman-Nemser , & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring issues in changing contexts (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Brophy, J. E. , & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.

Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.

Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307-333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cobb, P. , Confrey, J. , diSessa, A. , Lehrer, R. , & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Ask a different question, get a different answer: The research base for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(2), 111-115.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Studying teacher education: What we know and need to know. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(4), 301-306.

Cochran-Smith, M. , & Donnell, K. (2006). Practitioner inquiry: Blurring the boundaries of research and practice. In J. Green , G. Camilli , & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 503-518). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cochran-Smith, M. , & Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 69-109). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Cochran-Smith, M. , & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. Loughran , M. L. Hamilton , V. K. LaBoskey , & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp 601-649). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Design-Based Research Collective . (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.

Eisenhart, M. , & Borko, H. (1991). In search of an interdisciplinary collaborative design for studying teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 137-157.

Erikson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.

Florio-Ruane, S. (2002). More light: An argument for complexity in studies of teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 205-215.

Hostetler, K. (2005). What is “good” education research? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 16-21.

Shavelson, R. J. , Phillips, D. C. , Towne, L. , & Fuerer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25-28.

Shavelson, R. J. , & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education [Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.

Shulman, L. (2000). From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 43-53.

Sleeter, C. (2001). Epistemological diversity in research on preservice teacher preparation for historically underserved children. Review in Research in Education, 25, 209-250.

Smith, M. L. (2006). Multiple methodology in education research. In J. Green , G. Camilli , & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 457-475). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Thorndike, E. L. (1910). The contribution of psychology to education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 5-12.

Whitcomb, J. (2003). Learning and pedagogy in initial teacher preparation. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), & I. B. Weiner (Editor in chief), Handbook of psychology, Volume 7: Educational psychology, (pp. 533-556). New York: John Wiley.

Wilson, S. , Floden, R. , & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.

Wilson, S. M. (2006). Finding a canon and core: Meditations on the preparation of teacher educator-researchers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 315-325.

Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4-15.

Zeichner, K. (2005). A research agenda for teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 737-759). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.